Explaining legal judgments: A multitask learning framework for enhancing factual consistency in rationale generation
The explanation of legal judgments is crucial for the transparency, fairness, and trustworthiness, aiming to provide rationales for decision-making. While previous works have focused on improving the accuracy of legal judgment prediction, the lack of explainability seriously limits the practical app...
Main Authors: | Congqing He, Tien-Ping Tan, Sheng Xue, Yanyu Tan |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Journal of King Saud University: Computer and Information Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157823004226 |
Similar Items
-
Factual Actions on DKPP Ethical Decision Results as Objects of Examination by The State Administrative Court
by: Raines Wadi, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Human-annotated rationales and explainable text classification: a survey
by: Elize Herrewijnen, et al.
Published: (2024-05-01) -
Factuality Guided Diffusion-Based Abstractive Summarization
by: Jeongwan Shin, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
The identity of judgment and indictment
by: Ilić Ivan
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Knowledge-Enriched Multi-Cross Attention Network for Legal Judgment Prediction
by: Congqing He, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)