Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling

<p>In order to improve observations of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), the European Meteorological Network, EUMETNET, and the Aerosol, Clouds, and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure, ACTRIS, are currently working on building networks of microwave radiometers (MWRs). Elevation-scanning M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: T. Böck, B. Pospichal, U. Löhnert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2024-01-01
Series:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Online Access:https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/17/219/2024/amt-17-219-2024.pdf
_version_ 1797355007383699456
author T. Böck
B. Pospichal
U. Löhnert
author_facet T. Böck
B. Pospichal
U. Löhnert
author_sort T. Böck
collection DOAJ
description <p>In order to improve observations of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), the European Meteorological Network, EUMETNET, and the Aerosol, Clouds, and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure, ACTRIS, are currently working on building networks of microwave radiometers (MWRs). Elevation-scanning MWRs are well suited to obtain temperature profiles of the atmosphere, especially within the ABL. Understanding and assessing measurement uncertainties of state-of-the-art scanning MWRs is therefore crucial for accurate temperature profiling. In this paper, we discuss measurement uncertainties due to the instrument setup and originating from external sources, namely (1) horizontal inhomogeneities of the atmosphere, (2) pointing errors or a tilt of the instrument, (3) physical obstacles in the line of sight of the instrument, and (4) radio frequency interference (RFI). Horizontal inhomogeneities from observations at the Jülich Observatory for Cloud Evolution (JOYCE) are shown to have a small impact on retrieved temperature profiles (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mo>&lt;</mo><mo>|</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mn><mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">K</mi></mrow><mo>|</mo></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="49pt" height="13pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="f67089c9d5c06e6e69bad7c36cb13bcb"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="amt-17-219-2024-ie00001.svg" width="49pt" height="13pt" src="amt-17-219-2024-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> in the 25th and 75th percentiles below 3000 m). Typical instrument tilts, that could be caused by uncertainties during the instrument setup, also have a very small impact on temperature profiles and are smaller than 0.1 K below 3000 m for up to 1<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> of tilt. Physical obstacles at ambient temperatures and in the line of sight and filling the complete beam of the MWR at the lowest elevation angle of 5.4<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> have to be at least 600 m away from the instrument in order to have an impact of less than 0.1 K on obtained temperature profiles. If the obstacle is 5 K warmer than its surroundings then the obstacle should be at least 2700 m away. Finally, we present an approach on how to detect RFI with an MWR with azimuth and elevation-scanning capabilities. In this study, we detect RFIs in a water vapor channel that does not influence temperature retrievals but would be relevant if the MWR were used to detect horizontal humidity inhomogeneities.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-08T13:58:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b8e3e84e48e45c3af129e4624094b46
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1867-1381
1867-8548
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T13:58:01Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
spelling doaj.art-6b8e3e84e48e45c3af129e4624094b462024-01-15T09:52:07ZengCopernicus PublicationsAtmospheric Measurement Techniques1867-13811867-85482024-01-011721923310.5194/amt-17-219-2024Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profilingT. BöckB. PospichalU. Löhnert<p>In order to improve observations of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL), the European Meteorological Network, EUMETNET, and the Aerosol, Clouds, and Trace Gases Research Infrastructure, ACTRIS, are currently working on building networks of microwave radiometers (MWRs). Elevation-scanning MWRs are well suited to obtain temperature profiles of the atmosphere, especially within the ABL. Understanding and assessing measurement uncertainties of state-of-the-art scanning MWRs is therefore crucial for accurate temperature profiling. In this paper, we discuss measurement uncertainties due to the instrument setup and originating from external sources, namely (1) horizontal inhomogeneities of the atmosphere, (2) pointing errors or a tilt of the instrument, (3) physical obstacles in the line of sight of the instrument, and (4) radio frequency interference (RFI). Horizontal inhomogeneities from observations at the Jülich Observatory for Cloud Evolution (JOYCE) are shown to have a small impact on retrieved temperature profiles (<span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mo>&lt;</mo><mo>|</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mn><mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">K</mi></mrow><mo>|</mo></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="49pt" height="13pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="f67089c9d5c06e6e69bad7c36cb13bcb"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="amt-17-219-2024-ie00001.svg" width="49pt" height="13pt" src="amt-17-219-2024-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> in the 25th and 75th percentiles below 3000 m). Typical instrument tilts, that could be caused by uncertainties during the instrument setup, also have a very small impact on temperature profiles and are smaller than 0.1 K below 3000 m for up to 1<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> of tilt. Physical obstacles at ambient temperatures and in the line of sight and filling the complete beam of the MWR at the lowest elevation angle of 5.4<span class="inline-formula"><sup>∘</sup></span> have to be at least 600 m away from the instrument in order to have an impact of less than 0.1 K on obtained temperature profiles. If the obstacle is 5 K warmer than its surroundings then the obstacle should be at least 2700 m away. Finally, we present an approach on how to detect RFI with an MWR with azimuth and elevation-scanning capabilities. In this study, we detect RFIs in a water vapor channel that does not influence temperature retrievals but would be relevant if the MWR were used to detect horizontal humidity inhomogeneities.</p>https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/17/219/2024/amt-17-219-2024.pdf
spellingShingle T. Böck
B. Pospichal
U. Löhnert
Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
title Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling
title_full Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling
title_fullStr Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling
title_full_unstemmed Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling
title_short Measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling
title_sort measurement uncertainties of scanning microwave radiometers and their influence on temperature profiling
url https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/17/219/2024/amt-17-219-2024.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tbock measurementuncertaintiesofscanningmicrowaveradiometersandtheirinfluenceontemperatureprofiling
AT bpospichal measurementuncertaintiesofscanningmicrowaveradiometersandtheirinfluenceontemperatureprofiling
AT ulohnert measurementuncertaintiesofscanningmicrowaveradiometersandtheirinfluenceontemperatureprofiling