The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications

BackgroundOur aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing for pregnant women with different diagnostic indications.MethodsIn eight counties and districts of Yancheng, we studied 13,149 pregnant women with different indications who were offered NIPT for fetal screening,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianli Zheng, Haiyan Lu, Min Li, Yongjuan Guan, Fangfang Yang, Mengjun Xu, Jingjing Dong, Qinge Zhang, Ning An, Yun Zhou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00624/full
_version_ 1819116037944115200
author Jianli Zheng
Haiyan Lu
Min Li
Yongjuan Guan
Fangfang Yang
Mengjun Xu
Jingjing Dong
Qinge Zhang
Ning An
Yun Zhou
author_facet Jianli Zheng
Haiyan Lu
Min Li
Yongjuan Guan
Fangfang Yang
Mengjun Xu
Jingjing Dong
Qinge Zhang
Ning An
Yun Zhou
author_sort Jianli Zheng
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundOur aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing for pregnant women with different diagnostic indications.MethodsIn eight counties and districts of Yancheng, we studied 13,149 pregnant women with different indications who were offered NIPT for fetal screening, including for sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal trisomies (RATs), and subchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs). The purpose was to compare the detection of positive predictive values (PPVs) of different indications with the use of NIPT. The results were validated by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), or follow-up of pregnancy outcomes.Results13,149 maternal plasma samples were sequenced, among which 28 samples (0.2%) failed the sequencing quality control. The remaining 13,121 samples were analyzed, and birth follow-up missed 2,192 samples (16.7%). The PPVs of NIPT results for trisomy 21 (T21) and trisomy 18 (T18) and SCAs were 96.67, 63.64, and 31.34%, respectively. Among the advanced maternal age (AMA), serum screening high risk (SSHR), serum screening intermediate risk (SSIR), and voluntary screening (VS) groups, the PPVs for the common trisomies were 81.25, 85.71, 100, and 70%, respectively; the PPVs for total chromosomal abnormalities were 55.82, 65.22, 23.08, and 36.59%, respectively.ConclusionNIPT for T21 and T18 and SCAs screening were ideal, and the PPVs for trisomy 13 (T13), RATs, and CNVs were low. For the AMA and VS groups, NIPT could be used as a first-line screening program; for SSHR and SSIR groups, NIPT could be used as a second-line supplementary screening program.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T05:10:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b90534f928c4e03954e6a5f0bc62224
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-8021
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T05:10:43Z
publishDate 2020-06-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj.art-6b90534f928c4e03954e6a5f0bc622242022-12-21T18:37:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212020-06-011110.3389/fgene.2020.00624533790The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic IndicationsJianli ZhengHaiyan LuMin LiYongjuan GuanFangfang YangMengjun XuJingjing DongQinge ZhangNing AnYun ZhouBackgroundOur aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing for pregnant women with different diagnostic indications.MethodsIn eight counties and districts of Yancheng, we studied 13,149 pregnant women with different indications who were offered NIPT for fetal screening, including for sex chromosomal aneuploidies (SCAs), rare autosomal trisomies (RATs), and subchromosomal copy number variations (CNVs). The purpose was to compare the detection of positive predictive values (PPVs) of different indications with the use of NIPT. The results were validated by karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), or follow-up of pregnancy outcomes.Results13,149 maternal plasma samples were sequenced, among which 28 samples (0.2%) failed the sequencing quality control. The remaining 13,121 samples were analyzed, and birth follow-up missed 2,192 samples (16.7%). The PPVs of NIPT results for trisomy 21 (T21) and trisomy 18 (T18) and SCAs were 96.67, 63.64, and 31.34%, respectively. Among the advanced maternal age (AMA), serum screening high risk (SSHR), serum screening intermediate risk (SSIR), and voluntary screening (VS) groups, the PPVs for the common trisomies were 81.25, 85.71, 100, and 70%, respectively; the PPVs for total chromosomal abnormalities were 55.82, 65.22, 23.08, and 36.59%, respectively.ConclusionNIPT for T21 and T18 and SCAs screening were ideal, and the PPVs for trisomy 13 (T13), RATs, and CNVs were low. For the AMA and VS groups, NIPT could be used as a first-line screening program; for SSHR and SSIR groups, NIPT could be used as a second-line supplementary screening program.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00624/fullnon-invasive prenatal testingtrisomy 211813sex chromosome aneuploidiesrare autosomal trisomies
spellingShingle Jianli Zheng
Haiyan Lu
Min Li
Yongjuan Guan
Fangfang Yang
Mengjun Xu
Jingjing Dong
Qinge Zhang
Ning An
Yun Zhou
The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications
Frontiers in Genetics
non-invasive prenatal testing
trisomy 21
18
13
sex chromosome aneuploidies
rare autosomal trisomies
title The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications
title_full The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications
title_fullStr The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications
title_short The Clinical Utility of Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Pregnant Women With Different Diagnostic Indications
title_sort clinical utility of non invasive prenatal testing for pregnant women with different diagnostic indications
topic non-invasive prenatal testing
trisomy 21
18
13
sex chromosome aneuploidies
rare autosomal trisomies
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2020.00624/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jianlizheng theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT haiyanlu theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT minli theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT yongjuanguan theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT fangfangyang theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT mengjunxu theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT jingjingdong theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT qingezhang theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT ningan theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT yunzhou theclinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT jianlizheng clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT haiyanlu clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT minli clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT yongjuanguan clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT fangfangyang clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT mengjunxu clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT jingjingdong clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT qingezhang clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT ningan clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications
AT yunzhou clinicalutilityofnoninvasiveprenataltestingforpregnantwomenwithdifferentdiagnosticindications