Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients

<b>Background</b> : Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kritayakirana Kritaya, Maggio Paul, Brundage Susan, Purtill Mary-Anne, Staudenmayer Kristan, Spain David
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2010-01-01
Series:Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.onlinejets.org/article.asp?issn=0974-2700;year=2010;volume=3;issue=2;spage=118;epage=122;aulast=Kritayakirana
_version_ 1811242764072910848
author Kritayakirana Kritaya
Maggio Paul
Brundage Susan
Purtill Mary-Anne
Staudenmayer Kristan
Spain David
author_facet Kritayakirana Kritaya
Maggio Paul
Brundage Susan
Purtill Mary-Anne
Staudenmayer Kristan
Spain David
author_sort Kritayakirana Kritaya
collection DOAJ
description <b>Background</b> : Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients 1) is more often due to peritonitis, 2) has a lower incidence of definitive fascial closure during the index hospitalization, and 3) has a higher fistula rate. <b>Methods</b> : Retrospective case series of patients treated with the open abdomen technique over a 5-year period at a level-I trauma center. Data was collected from the trauma registry, operating room (OR) case log, and by chart review. The main outcome measures were number of operations, definitive fascial closure, fistula rate, complications, and length of stay. <b>Results</b> : One hundred and three patients were managed with an open abdomen over the 5-year period and we categorized them into three groups: elective (n = 31), urgent (n = 35), and trauma (n = 37). The majority of the patients were male (69&#x0025;). Trauma patients were younger (39 vs 53 years; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The most common indications for the open abdomen technique were intraabdominal hypertension in the elective group (n = 18), severe intraabdominal infection in the urgent group (n=19), and damage control surgery in the trauma group (n = 28). The number of abdominal operations was similar (3.1&#8722;3.7) in the three groups, as was the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (average: 25&#8722;31 days). The definitive fascial closure rates during initial hospitalization were as follows: 63&#x0025; in the elective group, 60&#x0025; in the urgent group, and 54&#x0025; in the trauma group. Intestinal fistula formation occurred in 16&#x0025;, 17&#x0025;, and 11&#x0025;, respectively, in the three groups, with overall mortality rates of 35&#x0025;, 31&#x0025;, and 11&#x0025;. <b>Conclusion</b> : Intra-abdominal infection was a common reason for use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients. However, the definitive fascial closure and fistula rates were similar in the three groups. Despite differences in indications, damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been successfully transitioned to elective and urgent non-trauma patients.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:55:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6b9f60d176274480818fea28a08b1d52
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0974-2700
0974-519X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:55:49Z
publishDate 2010-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock
spelling doaj.art-6b9f60d176274480818fea28a08b1d522022-12-22T03:30:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock0974-27000974-519X2010-01-0132118122Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patientsKritayakirana KritayaMaggio PaulBrundage SusanPurtill Mary-AnneStaudenmayer KristanSpain David<b>Background</b> : Damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been widely used in trauma. These techniques are now being utilized more often in non-trauma patients but the outcomes are not clear. We hypothesized that the use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients 1) is more often due to peritonitis, 2) has a lower incidence of definitive fascial closure during the index hospitalization, and 3) has a higher fistula rate. <b>Methods</b> : Retrospective case series of patients treated with the open abdomen technique over a 5-year period at a level-I trauma center. Data was collected from the trauma registry, operating room (OR) case log, and by chart review. The main outcome measures were number of operations, definitive fascial closure, fistula rate, complications, and length of stay. <b>Results</b> : One hundred and three patients were managed with an open abdomen over the 5-year period and we categorized them into three groups: elective (n = 31), urgent (n = 35), and trauma (n = 37). The majority of the patients were male (69&#x0025;). Trauma patients were younger (39 vs 53 years; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). The most common indications for the open abdomen technique were intraabdominal hypertension in the elective group (n = 18), severe intraabdominal infection in the urgent group (n=19), and damage control surgery in the trauma group (n = 28). The number of abdominal operations was similar (3.1&#8722;3.7) in the three groups, as was the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (average: 25&#8722;31 days). The definitive fascial closure rates during initial hospitalization were as follows: 63&#x0025; in the elective group, 60&#x0025; in the urgent group, and 54&#x0025; in the trauma group. Intestinal fistula formation occurred in 16&#x0025;, 17&#x0025;, and 11&#x0025;, respectively, in the three groups, with overall mortality rates of 35&#x0025;, 31&#x0025;, and 11&#x0025;. <b>Conclusion</b> : Intra-abdominal infection was a common reason for use of the open abdomen technique in non-trauma patients. However, the definitive fascial closure and fistula rates were similar in the three groups. Despite differences in indications, damage control surgery and the open abdomen technique have been successfully transitioned to elective and urgent non-trauma patients.http://www.onlinejets.org/article.asp?issn=0974-2700;year=2010;volume=3;issue=2;spage=118;epage=122;aulast=KritayakiranaDamage controllaparotomyopen abdomenfistula
spellingShingle Kritayakirana Kritaya
Maggio Paul
Brundage Susan
Purtill Mary-Anne
Staudenmayer Kristan
Spain David
Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma and Shock
Damage control
laparotomy
open abdomen
fistula
title Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_full Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_fullStr Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_short Outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non-trauma patients
title_sort outcomes and complications of open abdomen technique for managing non trauma patients
topic Damage control
laparotomy
open abdomen
fistula
url http://www.onlinejets.org/article.asp?issn=0974-2700;year=2010;volume=3;issue=2;spage=118;epage=122;aulast=Kritayakirana
work_keys_str_mv AT kritayakiranakritaya outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT maggiopaul outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT brundagesusan outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT purtillmaryanne outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT staudenmayerkristan outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients
AT spaindavid outcomesandcomplicationsofopenabdomentechniqueformanagingnontraumapatients