Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-a
The author has continued his research of the history of Trinitarian doctrine, the results of which are presented in this second part of the series. The historical and theological survey of the available data offered by primary sources has yielded sufficient ground to argue that the Church Fathers o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Editura Universității Adventus
2015-12-01
|
| Series: | TheoRhēma |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/86 |
| _version_ | 1797822470739197952 |
|---|---|
| author | Zoltán Szallós-Farkas |
| author_facet | Zoltán Szallós-Farkas |
| author_sort | Zoltán Szallós-Farkas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
The author has continued his research of the history of Trinitarian doctrine, the results of which are presented in this second part of the series. The historical and theological survey of the available data offered by primary sources has yielded sufficient ground to argue that the Church Fathers of the East and West, and the Ecumenical Councils, especially Nicea, had contributed, in a significant fashion, to the formation of two models of the Trinitarian understanding of God by the end of the patristic era (8th century). Their Trinitarian vocabulary, economic perspective, as well as perichoretic understanding of God have to be seen as a major stepping stone towards the crystalisation of the classical theistic doctrine of God. This is to say that Nicean and post-Nicean developments testify to an understanding of the Trinitarian relationship of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit that has been articulated in the language and vocabulary of the Early / Apostolic Fathers, to which new aspects have been added by the Cappadocian Fathers and Augustin. The study has evidenced that a clear chronologically viable ontological anteriority within the Godhead may be seen as being suggested by the language of “eternal generation,” “begotten-ness,” and “procession,” a language the Church Fathers have accepted as theologically appropriate and sound, and deployed it in the wording of the Creed.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-13T10:08:29Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6ba7894da92846c5a64f20409d518afe |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1842-0613 2784-2665 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-13T10:08:29Z |
| publishDate | 2015-12-01 |
| publisher | Editura Universității Adventus |
| record_format | Article |
| series | TheoRhēma |
| spelling | doaj.art-6ba7894da92846c5a64f20409d518afe2023-05-22T07:55:28ZengEditura Universității AdventusTheoRhēma1842-06132784-26652015-12-01102Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-aZoltán Szallós-Farkas0PhD, Associate Professor, Adventist Theological Institute, Cernica, Romania The author has continued his research of the history of Trinitarian doctrine, the results of which are presented in this second part of the series. The historical and theological survey of the available data offered by primary sources has yielded sufficient ground to argue that the Church Fathers of the East and West, and the Ecumenical Councils, especially Nicea, had contributed, in a significant fashion, to the formation of two models of the Trinitarian understanding of God by the end of the patristic era (8th century). Their Trinitarian vocabulary, economic perspective, as well as perichoretic understanding of God have to be seen as a major stepping stone towards the crystalisation of the classical theistic doctrine of God. This is to say that Nicean and post-Nicean developments testify to an understanding of the Trinitarian relationship of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit that has been articulated in the language and vocabulary of the Early / Apostolic Fathers, to which new aspects have been added by the Cappadocian Fathers and Augustin. The study has evidenced that a clear chronologically viable ontological anteriority within the Godhead may be seen as being suggested by the language of “eternal generation,” “begotten-ness,” and “procession,” a language the Church Fathers have accepted as theologically appropriate and sound, and deployed it in the wording of the Creed. https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/86Trinitarianeternal generationbegottenCouncilChurch Fathersperichoresis |
| spellingShingle | Zoltán Szallós-Farkas Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-a TheoRhēma Trinitarian eternal generation begotten Council Church Fathers perichoresis |
| title | Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-a |
| title_full | Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-a |
| title_fullStr | Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-a |
| title_full_unstemmed | Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-a |
| title_short | Doctrina Trinității în perioada patristică: părinții bisericești și Conciliul de la Niceea – partea a II-a |
| title_sort | doctrina trinitatii in perioada patristica parintii bisericesti si conciliul de la niceea partea a ii a |
| topic | Trinitarian eternal generation begotten Council Church Fathers perichoresis |
| url | https://publications.uadventus.ro/index.php/thrh/article/view/86 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT zoltanszallosfarkas doctrinatrinitatiiinperioadapatristicaparintiibisericestisiconciliuldelaniceeaparteaaiia |