Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory

The following essay begins by outlining the pragmatist link between truth claims and democratic deliberations. To this end, special attention will be paid to Jeffrey Stout’s pragmatist enfranchisement of religious citizens. Stout defends a deliberative notion of democracy that fulfills stringent cri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Timothy Stanley
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Religions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/4/210
_version_ 1827718224040427520
author Timothy Stanley
author_facet Timothy Stanley
author_sort Timothy Stanley
collection DOAJ
description The following essay begins by outlining the pragmatist link between truth claims and democratic deliberations. To this end, special attention will be paid to Jeffrey Stout’s pragmatist enfranchisement of religious citizens. Stout defends a deliberative notion of democracy that fulfills stringent criteria of inclusion and security against domination. While mitigating secular exclusivity, Stout nonetheless acknowledges the new visibility of religion in populist attempts to dominate political life through mass rule and charismatic authorities. In response, I evaluate recent innovations in deliberative democratic systems theory (DDST). By adding a pragmatist inflection to DDST, I aim to apprehend the complex religious interactions between partisan interest groups as well as the trust-building capacities of minipublics.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:18:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6bcfb2b75f5a46e083017f15eeb397a3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1444
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:18:23Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Religions
spelling doaj.art-6bcfb2b75f5a46e083017f15eeb397a32023-11-19T22:21:31ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-04-0111421010.3390/rel11040210Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems TheoryTimothy Stanley0School of Humanities and Social Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, AustraliaThe following essay begins by outlining the pragmatist link between truth claims and democratic deliberations. To this end, special attention will be paid to Jeffrey Stout’s pragmatist enfranchisement of religious citizens. Stout defends a deliberative notion of democracy that fulfills stringent criteria of inclusion and security against domination. While mitigating secular exclusivity, Stout nonetheless acknowledges the new visibility of religion in populist attempts to dominate political life through mass rule and charismatic authorities. In response, I evaluate recent innovations in deliberative democratic systems theory (DDST). By adding a pragmatist inflection to DDST, I aim to apprehend the complex religious interactions between partisan interest groups as well as the trust-building capacities of minipublics.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/4/210populismpragmatismdeliberative systemsdemocracy
spellingShingle Timothy Stanley
Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory
Religions
populism
pragmatism
deliberative systems
democracy
title Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory
title_full Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory
title_fullStr Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory
title_full_unstemmed Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory
title_short Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory
title_sort religious interactions in deliberative democratic systems theory
topic populism
pragmatism
deliberative systems
democracy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/4/210
work_keys_str_mv AT timothystanley religiousinteractionsindeliberativedemocraticsystemstheory