Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory
The following essay begins by outlining the pragmatist link between truth claims and democratic deliberations. To this end, special attention will be paid to Jeffrey Stout’s pragmatist enfranchisement of religious citizens. Stout defends a deliberative notion of democracy that fulfills stringent cri...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Religions |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/4/210 |
_version_ | 1827718224040427520 |
---|---|
author | Timothy Stanley |
author_facet | Timothy Stanley |
author_sort | Timothy Stanley |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The following essay begins by outlining the pragmatist link between truth claims and democratic deliberations. To this end, special attention will be paid to Jeffrey Stout’s pragmatist enfranchisement of religious citizens. Stout defends a deliberative notion of democracy that fulfills stringent criteria of inclusion and security against domination. While mitigating secular exclusivity, Stout nonetheless acknowledges the new visibility of religion in populist attempts to dominate political life through mass rule and charismatic authorities. In response, I evaluate recent innovations in deliberative democratic systems theory (DDST). By adding a pragmatist inflection to DDST, I aim to apprehend the complex religious interactions between partisan interest groups as well as the trust-building capacities of minipublics. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:18:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6bcfb2b75f5a46e083017f15eeb397a3 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2077-1444 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T20:18:23Z |
publishDate | 2020-04-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Religions |
spelling | doaj.art-6bcfb2b75f5a46e083017f15eeb397a32023-11-19T22:21:31ZengMDPI AGReligions2077-14442020-04-0111421010.3390/rel11040210Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems TheoryTimothy Stanley0School of Humanities and Social Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, AustraliaThe following essay begins by outlining the pragmatist link between truth claims and democratic deliberations. To this end, special attention will be paid to Jeffrey Stout’s pragmatist enfranchisement of religious citizens. Stout defends a deliberative notion of democracy that fulfills stringent criteria of inclusion and security against domination. While mitigating secular exclusivity, Stout nonetheless acknowledges the new visibility of religion in populist attempts to dominate political life through mass rule and charismatic authorities. In response, I evaluate recent innovations in deliberative democratic systems theory (DDST). By adding a pragmatist inflection to DDST, I aim to apprehend the complex religious interactions between partisan interest groups as well as the trust-building capacities of minipublics.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/4/210populismpragmatismdeliberative systemsdemocracy |
spellingShingle | Timothy Stanley Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory Religions populism pragmatism deliberative systems democracy |
title | Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory |
title_full | Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory |
title_fullStr | Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory |
title_short | Religious Interactions in Deliberative Democratic Systems Theory |
title_sort | religious interactions in deliberative democratic systems theory |
topic | populism pragmatism deliberative systems democracy |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/4/210 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT timothystanley religiousinteractionsindeliberativedemocraticsystemstheory |