Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control
Changes in free-roaming dog population size are important indicators of the effectiveness of dog population management. Assessing the effectiveness of different management methods also requires estimating the processes that change population size, such as the rates of recruitment into and removal fr...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2022-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462782/?tool=EBI |
_version_ | 1818065349430476800 |
---|---|
author | Lauren Margaret Smith Conor Goold Rupert J. Quinnell Alexandru M. Munteanu Sabine Hartmann Paolo Dalla Villa Lisa M. Collins |
author_facet | Lauren Margaret Smith Conor Goold Rupert J. Quinnell Alexandru M. Munteanu Sabine Hartmann Paolo Dalla Villa Lisa M. Collins |
author_sort | Lauren Margaret Smith |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Changes in free-roaming dog population size are important indicators of the effectiveness of dog population management. Assessing the effectiveness of different management methods also requires estimating the processes that change population size, such as the rates of recruitment into and removal from a population. This is one of the first studies to quantify the size, rates of recruitment and removal, and health and welfare status of free-roaming dog populations in Europe. We determined the size, dynamics, and health status of free-roaming dog populations in Pescara, Italy, and Lviv, Ukraine, over a 15-month study period. Both study populations had ongoing dog population management through catch-neuter-release and sheltering programmes. Average monthly apparent survival probability was 0.93 (95% CI 0.81–1.00) in Pescara and 0.93 (95% CI 0.84–0.99) in Lviv. An average of 7 dogs km-2 were observed in Pescara and 40 dogs km-2 in Lviv. Per capita entry probabilities varied between 0.09 and 0.20 in Pescara, and 0.12 and 0.42 in Lviv. In Lviv, detection probability was lower on weekdays (odds ratio: 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–0.96) and higher on market days (odds ratio: 2.58, 95% CI 1.28–4.14), and apparent survival probability was lower in males (odds ratio: 0.25, 95% CI 0.03–0.59). Few juveniles were observed in the study populations, indicating that recruitment may be occurring by movement between dog subpopulations (e.g. from local owned or neighbouring free-roaming dog populations), with important consequences for population control. This study provides important data for planning effective dog population management and for informing population and infectious disease modelling. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:50:29Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6bd35ab14be847f6af7fed1dd2c3694d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T14:50:29Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-6bd35ab14be847f6af7fed1dd2c3694d2022-12-22T01:44:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01179Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population controlLauren Margaret SmithConor GooldRupert J. QuinnellAlexandru M. MunteanuSabine HartmannPaolo Dalla VillaLisa M. CollinsChanges in free-roaming dog population size are important indicators of the effectiveness of dog population management. Assessing the effectiveness of different management methods also requires estimating the processes that change population size, such as the rates of recruitment into and removal from a population. This is one of the first studies to quantify the size, rates of recruitment and removal, and health and welfare status of free-roaming dog populations in Europe. We determined the size, dynamics, and health status of free-roaming dog populations in Pescara, Italy, and Lviv, Ukraine, over a 15-month study period. Both study populations had ongoing dog population management through catch-neuter-release and sheltering programmes. Average monthly apparent survival probability was 0.93 (95% CI 0.81–1.00) in Pescara and 0.93 (95% CI 0.84–0.99) in Lviv. An average of 7 dogs km-2 were observed in Pescara and 40 dogs km-2 in Lviv. Per capita entry probabilities varied between 0.09 and 0.20 in Pescara, and 0.12 and 0.42 in Lviv. In Lviv, detection probability was lower on weekdays (odds ratio: 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–0.96) and higher on market days (odds ratio: 2.58, 95% CI 1.28–4.14), and apparent survival probability was lower in males (odds ratio: 0.25, 95% CI 0.03–0.59). Few juveniles were observed in the study populations, indicating that recruitment may be occurring by movement between dog subpopulations (e.g. from local owned or neighbouring free-roaming dog populations), with important consequences for population control. This study provides important data for planning effective dog population management and for informing population and infectious disease modelling.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462782/?tool=EBI |
spellingShingle | Lauren Margaret Smith Conor Goold Rupert J. Quinnell Alexandru M. Munteanu Sabine Hartmann Paolo Dalla Villa Lisa M. Collins Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control PLoS ONE |
title | Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control |
title_full | Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control |
title_fullStr | Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control |
title_full_unstemmed | Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control |
title_short | Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control |
title_sort | population dynamics of free roaming dogs in two european regions and implications for population control |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462782/?tool=EBI |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laurenmargaretsmith populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol AT conorgoold populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol AT rupertjquinnell populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol AT alexandrummunteanu populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol AT sabinehartmann populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol AT paolodallavilla populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol AT lisamcollins populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol |