Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control

Changes in free-roaming dog population size are important indicators of the effectiveness of dog population management. Assessing the effectiveness of different management methods also requires estimating the processes that change population size, such as the rates of recruitment into and removal fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lauren Margaret Smith, Conor Goold, Rupert J. Quinnell, Alexandru M. Munteanu, Sabine Hartmann, Paolo Dalla Villa, Lisa M. Collins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462782/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1818065349430476800
author Lauren Margaret Smith
Conor Goold
Rupert J. Quinnell
Alexandru M. Munteanu
Sabine Hartmann
Paolo Dalla Villa
Lisa M. Collins
author_facet Lauren Margaret Smith
Conor Goold
Rupert J. Quinnell
Alexandru M. Munteanu
Sabine Hartmann
Paolo Dalla Villa
Lisa M. Collins
author_sort Lauren Margaret Smith
collection DOAJ
description Changes in free-roaming dog population size are important indicators of the effectiveness of dog population management. Assessing the effectiveness of different management methods also requires estimating the processes that change population size, such as the rates of recruitment into and removal from a population. This is one of the first studies to quantify the size, rates of recruitment and removal, and health and welfare status of free-roaming dog populations in Europe. We determined the size, dynamics, and health status of free-roaming dog populations in Pescara, Italy, and Lviv, Ukraine, over a 15-month study period. Both study populations had ongoing dog population management through catch-neuter-release and sheltering programmes. Average monthly apparent survival probability was 0.93 (95% CI 0.81–1.00) in Pescara and 0.93 (95% CI 0.84–0.99) in Lviv. An average of 7 dogs km-2 were observed in Pescara and 40 dogs km-2 in Lviv. Per capita entry probabilities varied between 0.09 and 0.20 in Pescara, and 0.12 and 0.42 in Lviv. In Lviv, detection probability was lower on weekdays (odds ratio: 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–0.96) and higher on market days (odds ratio: 2.58, 95% CI 1.28–4.14), and apparent survival probability was lower in males (odds ratio: 0.25, 95% CI 0.03–0.59). Few juveniles were observed in the study populations, indicating that recruitment may be occurring by movement between dog subpopulations (e.g. from local owned or neighbouring free-roaming dog populations), with important consequences for population control. This study provides important data for planning effective dog population management and for informing population and infectious disease modelling.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T14:50:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6bd35ab14be847f6af7fed1dd2c3694d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T14:50:29Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6bd35ab14be847f6af7fed1dd2c3694d2022-12-22T01:44:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01179Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population controlLauren Margaret SmithConor GooldRupert J. QuinnellAlexandru M. MunteanuSabine HartmannPaolo Dalla VillaLisa M. CollinsChanges in free-roaming dog population size are important indicators of the effectiveness of dog population management. Assessing the effectiveness of different management methods also requires estimating the processes that change population size, such as the rates of recruitment into and removal from a population. This is one of the first studies to quantify the size, rates of recruitment and removal, and health and welfare status of free-roaming dog populations in Europe. We determined the size, dynamics, and health status of free-roaming dog populations in Pescara, Italy, and Lviv, Ukraine, over a 15-month study period. Both study populations had ongoing dog population management through catch-neuter-release and sheltering programmes. Average monthly apparent survival probability was 0.93 (95% CI 0.81–1.00) in Pescara and 0.93 (95% CI 0.84–0.99) in Lviv. An average of 7 dogs km-2 were observed in Pescara and 40 dogs km-2 in Lviv. Per capita entry probabilities varied between 0.09 and 0.20 in Pescara, and 0.12 and 0.42 in Lviv. In Lviv, detection probability was lower on weekdays (odds ratio: 0.74, 95% CI 0.53–0.96) and higher on market days (odds ratio: 2.58, 95% CI 1.28–4.14), and apparent survival probability was lower in males (odds ratio: 0.25, 95% CI 0.03–0.59). Few juveniles were observed in the study populations, indicating that recruitment may be occurring by movement between dog subpopulations (e.g. from local owned or neighbouring free-roaming dog populations), with important consequences for population control. This study provides important data for planning effective dog population management and for informing population and infectious disease modelling.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462782/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Lauren Margaret Smith
Conor Goold
Rupert J. Quinnell
Alexandru M. Munteanu
Sabine Hartmann
Paolo Dalla Villa
Lisa M. Collins
Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control
PLoS ONE
title Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control
title_full Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control
title_fullStr Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control
title_full_unstemmed Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control
title_short Population dynamics of free-roaming dogs in two European regions and implications for population control
title_sort population dynamics of free roaming dogs in two european regions and implications for population control
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9462782/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT laurenmargaretsmith populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol
AT conorgoold populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol
AT rupertjquinnell populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol
AT alexandrummunteanu populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol
AT sabinehartmann populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol
AT paolodallavilla populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol
AT lisamcollins populationdynamicsoffreeroamingdogsintwoeuropeanregionsandimplicationsforpopulationcontrol