It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATO
After Russia invaded Ukraine, Finland quickly applied for NATO membership. This step is not necessarily that drastic should Finland’s security policy development in the long term be examined with one’s focus set on a gradually-developed defence policy. It represents an important continuity in secur...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Center for Europe, Warsaw University
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | Studia Europejskie |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journalse.com/pliki/pw/4-2022-Nokkala.pdf |
| _version_ | 1811166984271822848 |
|---|---|
| author | Arto Nokkala |
| author_facet | Arto Nokkala |
| author_sort | Arto Nokkala |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | After Russia invaded Ukraine, Finland quickly applied for NATO membership. This step is not necessarily that drastic should Finland’s
security policy development in the long term be examined with one’s focus set on a gradually-developed defence policy. It represents an important continuity in security policy, but also played a central role in advancing Finland’s steps to becoming NATO members. On the basis of different studies and accounts, the following points seem to be critical in constructing a preliminary narrative about Finland’s road to the Alliance.
After the Second World War, Finland’s western relations became dependent on its bilateral relations with the Soviet Union. Finland was aware that it could not expect any support from the West as regards its security. Despite a security policy based on recognising facts, and the FCMA Treaty with the Soviet Union, the eastern neighbour was seen as the main, and, later on, the only military threat on the basis of history and Finland’s vulnerable geopolitical position. The threat, however, was concealed by so-called “doubletalk” in security policy discourse until the 2010s. In this context, state defence was developed to be an independent and modern territorial defence, ultimately there to defend against a large-scale invasion. Finland’s defence enjoyed high legitimacy and confidence in society, especially from the 1970s. Security policy was raised above normal politics to be a kind of super-politics with a strong political consensus. When the Cold War ended and Finland joined the European Union, defence policy and the defence establishment got a leading role in working an approaching NATO. Finland’s opportunities to conduct stabilisation policy in its close neighbourhood were seen as being limited, especially after Russia adopted a self-asserting foreign and security policy towards the West after 2007. At the same time, the subsequently increased cooperation, networking, and integration stimulated perceptions about western defence dependence. This increased emphasis on defence actually turned people’s attention to the extra security that NATO membership might provide. Applying for NATO, however, required the shock of a Russian invasion of Ukraine before the Finnish public was ready to see the risks of NATO membership as being less than that of its benefits. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:01:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6bd66f4142a04d5d81081b174488ae83 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1428-149X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:01:28Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Center for Europe, Warsaw University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Studia Europejskie |
| spelling | doaj.art-6bd66f4142a04d5d81081b174488ae832023-02-10T11:51:27ZengCenter for Europe, Warsaw UniversityStudia Europejskie1428-149X2023-01-01264397210.33067/SE.4.2022.2It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATOArto Nokkala0https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2512-9727Finnish National Defence UniversityAfter Russia invaded Ukraine, Finland quickly applied for NATO membership. This step is not necessarily that drastic should Finland’s security policy development in the long term be examined with one’s focus set on a gradually-developed defence policy. It represents an important continuity in security policy, but also played a central role in advancing Finland’s steps to becoming NATO members. On the basis of different studies and accounts, the following points seem to be critical in constructing a preliminary narrative about Finland’s road to the Alliance. After the Second World War, Finland’s western relations became dependent on its bilateral relations with the Soviet Union. Finland was aware that it could not expect any support from the West as regards its security. Despite a security policy based on recognising facts, and the FCMA Treaty with the Soviet Union, the eastern neighbour was seen as the main, and, later on, the only military threat on the basis of history and Finland’s vulnerable geopolitical position. The threat, however, was concealed by so-called “doubletalk” in security policy discourse until the 2010s. In this context, state defence was developed to be an independent and modern territorial defence, ultimately there to defend against a large-scale invasion. Finland’s defence enjoyed high legitimacy and confidence in society, especially from the 1970s. Security policy was raised above normal politics to be a kind of super-politics with a strong political consensus. When the Cold War ended and Finland joined the European Union, defence policy and the defence establishment got a leading role in working an approaching NATO. Finland’s opportunities to conduct stabilisation policy in its close neighbourhood were seen as being limited, especially after Russia adopted a self-asserting foreign and security policy towards the West after 2007. At the same time, the subsequently increased cooperation, networking, and integration stimulated perceptions about western defence dependence. This increased emphasis on defence actually turned people’s attention to the extra security that NATO membership might provide. Applying for NATO, however, required the shock of a Russian invasion of Ukraine before the Finnish public was ready to see the risks of NATO membership as being less than that of its benefits.https://journalse.com/pliki/pw/4-2022-Nokkala.pdffinlandsecurity policydefencenatorussia |
| spellingShingle | Arto Nokkala It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATO Studia Europejskie finland security policy defence nato russia |
| title | It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATO |
| title_full | It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATO |
| title_fullStr | It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATO |
| title_full_unstemmed | It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATO |
| title_short | It Is About Protection. Defence in Finland’s Steps to NATO |
| title_sort | it is about protection defence in finland s steps to nato |
| topic | finland security policy defence nato russia |
| url | https://journalse.com/pliki/pw/4-2022-Nokkala.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT artonokkala itisaboutprotectiondefenceinfinlandsstepstonato |