Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies

Objective: This study aims to evaluate outcome after conservative management (no pharmacological/surgical intervention other than fluid restriction, diuretics, or ventilator adjustments) compared with active (pharmacological and/or surgical) treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tim Hundscheid, Esther J. S. Jansen, Wes Onland, Elisabeth M. W. Kooi, Peter Andriessen, Willem P. de Boode
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-02-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.626261/full
_version_ 1818857196929155072
author Tim Hundscheid
Esther J. S. Jansen
Wes Onland
Elisabeth M. W. Kooi
Peter Andriessen
Peter Andriessen
Willem P. de Boode
author_facet Tim Hundscheid
Esther J. S. Jansen
Wes Onland
Elisabeth M. W. Kooi
Peter Andriessen
Peter Andriessen
Willem P. de Boode
author_sort Tim Hundscheid
collection DOAJ
description Objective: This study aims to evaluate outcome after conservative management (no pharmacological/surgical intervention other than fluid restriction, diuretics, or ventilator adjustments) compared with active (pharmacological and/or surgical) treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants and analyze differences in outcome between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies.Study Design: This is a systematic literature review using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. RCTs and cohort studies comparing conservative management with active treatment were included. Meta-analysis was used to compare conservative management with any active (pharmacological and/or surgical), any pharmacological (non-prophylactic and prophylactic), and/or surgical treatment for mortality as primary and major neonatal morbidity as secondary outcome measure. Fixed-effect analysis was used, unless heterogeneity (I2) was >50%. Outcome is presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval.Results: Twelve cohort studies and four RCTs were included, encompassing 41,804 and 720 patients, respectively. In cohort studies, conservative management for PDA was associated with a significantly higher risk for mortality (RR, 1.34 [1.12–1.62]) but a significantly lower risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR, 0.55 [0.46–0.65]), necrotizing enterocolitis (RR, 0.85 [0.77–0.93]), intraventricular hemorrhage (RR, 0.88 [0.83–0.95]), and retinopathy of prematurity (RR, 0.47 [0.28–0.79]) compared with any active PDA treatment. Meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed no significant differences in outcome between conservative management and active treatment.Conclusion: No differences in mortality or morbidity for conservative management compared with active treatment regimens were observed in RCTs. Findings from cohort studies mainly highlight the lack of high-quality evidence for conservative management for PDA in preterm infants.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T08:36:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6be37e5d7b4c4688a51da805720fffce
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T08:36:33Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-6be37e5d7b4c4688a51da805720fffce2022-12-21T20:29:01ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602021-02-01910.3389/fped.2021.626261626261Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort StudiesTim Hundscheid0Esther J. S. Jansen1Wes Onland2Elisabeth M. W. Kooi3Peter Andriessen4Peter Andriessen5Willem P. de Boode6Division of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, NetherlandsDepartment of Neonatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, NetherlandsDivision of Neonatology, University Medical Center Groningen, Beatrix Children's Hospital, University of Groningen, Groningen, NetherlandsDepartment of Neonatology, Máxima Medical Center Veldhoven, Eindhoven, NetherlandsDepartment of Applied Physics, School of Medical Physics and Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, NetherlandsDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Amalia Children's Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, NetherlandsObjective: This study aims to evaluate outcome after conservative management (no pharmacological/surgical intervention other than fluid restriction, diuretics, or ventilator adjustments) compared with active (pharmacological and/or surgical) treatment for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants and analyze differences in outcome between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies.Study Design: This is a systematic literature review using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library. RCTs and cohort studies comparing conservative management with active treatment were included. Meta-analysis was used to compare conservative management with any active (pharmacological and/or surgical), any pharmacological (non-prophylactic and prophylactic), and/or surgical treatment for mortality as primary and major neonatal morbidity as secondary outcome measure. Fixed-effect analysis was used, unless heterogeneity (I2) was >50%. Outcome is presented as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval.Results: Twelve cohort studies and four RCTs were included, encompassing 41,804 and 720 patients, respectively. In cohort studies, conservative management for PDA was associated with a significantly higher risk for mortality (RR, 1.34 [1.12–1.62]) but a significantly lower risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR, 0.55 [0.46–0.65]), necrotizing enterocolitis (RR, 0.85 [0.77–0.93]), intraventricular hemorrhage (RR, 0.88 [0.83–0.95]), and retinopathy of prematurity (RR, 0.47 [0.28–0.79]) compared with any active PDA treatment. Meta-analysis of the RCTs revealed no significant differences in outcome between conservative management and active treatment.Conclusion: No differences in mortality or morbidity for conservative management compared with active treatment regimens were observed in RCTs. Findings from cohort studies mainly highlight the lack of high-quality evidence for conservative management for PDA in preterm infants.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.626261/fullPDAibuprofenindomethacinparacetamolligationplacebo
spellingShingle Tim Hundscheid
Esther J. S. Jansen
Wes Onland
Elisabeth M. W. Kooi
Peter Andriessen
Peter Andriessen
Willem P. de Boode
Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies
Frontiers in Pediatrics
PDA
ibuprofen
indomethacin
paracetamol
ligation
placebo
title Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies
title_full Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies
title_fullStr Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies
title_full_unstemmed Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies
title_short Conservative Management of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses Assessing Differences in Outcome Measures Between Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies
title_sort conservative management of patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants a systematic review and meta analyses assessing differences in outcome measures between randomized controlled trials and cohort studies
topic PDA
ibuprofen
indomethacin
paracetamol
ligation
placebo
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2021.626261/full
work_keys_str_mv AT timhundscheid conservativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesassessingdifferencesinoutcomemeasuresbetweenrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies
AT estherjsjansen conservativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesassessingdifferencesinoutcomemeasuresbetweenrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies
AT wesonland conservativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesassessingdifferencesinoutcomemeasuresbetweenrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies
AT elisabethmwkooi conservativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesassessingdifferencesinoutcomemeasuresbetweenrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies
AT peterandriessen conservativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesassessingdifferencesinoutcomemeasuresbetweenrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies
AT peterandriessen conservativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesassessingdifferencesinoutcomemeasuresbetweenrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies
AT willempdeboode conservativemanagementofpatentductusarteriosusinpreterminfantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysesassessingdifferencesinoutcomemeasuresbetweenrandomizedcontrolledtrialsandcohortstudies