Reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic review

Abstract Objective To summarize the reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the stiffness, excursion, stiffness, or strain rate of diaphragm, intercostals and abdominal muscles in healthy or non-hospitalized individuals. Literature search PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Coc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emma FengMing Zhou, Siu Ngor Fu, Chen Huang, Xiu Ping Huang, Arnold Yu Lok Wong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-12-01
Series:BMC Oral Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03558-y
_version_ 1797413814450257920
author Emma FengMing Zhou
Siu Ngor Fu
Chen Huang
Xiu Ping Huang
Arnold Yu Lok Wong
author_facet Emma FengMing Zhou
Siu Ngor Fu
Chen Huang
Xiu Ping Huang
Arnold Yu Lok Wong
author_sort Emma FengMing Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To summarize the reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the stiffness, excursion, stiffness, or strain rate of diaphragm, intercostals and abdominal muscles in healthy or non-hospitalized individuals. Literature search PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 30, 2022. Study selection criteria Case–control, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies were included if they investigated the reliability or validity of various ultrasonography technologies (e.g., brightness-mode, motion-mode, shear wave elastography) in measuring the thickness, excursion, stiffness, or strain rate of any respiratory muscles. Data synthesis Relevant data were summarized based on healthy and different patient populations. The methodological quality by different checklist depending on study design. The quality of evidence of each psychometric property was graded by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations, respectively. Results This review included 24 studies with 787 healthy or non-hospitalized individuals (e.g., lower back pain (LBP), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)). Both inspiratory (diaphragm and intercostal muscles) and expiratory muscles (abdominal muscles) were investigated. Moderate-quality evidence supported sufficient (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.7) within-day intra-rater reliability of B-mode ultrasonography in measuring right diaphragmatic thickness among people with LBP, sufficient between-day intra-rater reliability of M-mode ultrasonography in measuring right diaphragmatic excursion in non-hospitalized individuals. The quality of evidence for all other measurement properties in various populations was low or very low. High-quality evidence supported sufficient positive correlations between diaphragm excursion and forced expiratory volume in the first second or forced vital capacity (r >  = 0.3) in healthy individuals. Conclusions Despite the reported sufficient reliability and validity of using ultrasonography to assess the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals, further large-scale studies are warranted to improve the quality of evidence regarding using ultrasonography for these measurements in clinical practice. Researchers should establish their own reliability before using various types of ultrasonography to evaluate respiratory muscle functions. Trial registration PROSPERO NO. CRD42022322945.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:23:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6bee1253e7b14b9a99a7b0445d157e07
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6831
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:23:14Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Oral Health
spelling doaj.art-6bee1253e7b14b9a99a7b0445d157e072023-12-03T12:38:40ZengBMCBMC Oral Health1472-68312023-12-0123112110.1186/s12903-023-03558-yReliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic reviewEmma FengMing Zhou0Siu Ngor Fu1Chen Huang2Xiu Ping Huang3Arnold Yu Lok Wong4Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityAbstract Objective To summarize the reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the stiffness, excursion, stiffness, or strain rate of diaphragm, intercostals and abdominal muscles in healthy or non-hospitalized individuals. Literature search PubMed, Embase, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to May 30, 2022. Study selection criteria Case–control, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies were included if they investigated the reliability or validity of various ultrasonography technologies (e.g., brightness-mode, motion-mode, shear wave elastography) in measuring the thickness, excursion, stiffness, or strain rate of any respiratory muscles. Data synthesis Relevant data were summarized based on healthy and different patient populations. The methodological quality by different checklist depending on study design. The quality of evidence of each psychometric property was graded by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations, respectively. Results This review included 24 studies with 787 healthy or non-hospitalized individuals (e.g., lower back pain (LBP), adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)). Both inspiratory (diaphragm and intercostal muscles) and expiratory muscles (abdominal muscles) were investigated. Moderate-quality evidence supported sufficient (intra-class correlation coefficient > 0.7) within-day intra-rater reliability of B-mode ultrasonography in measuring right diaphragmatic thickness among people with LBP, sufficient between-day intra-rater reliability of M-mode ultrasonography in measuring right diaphragmatic excursion in non-hospitalized individuals. The quality of evidence for all other measurement properties in various populations was low or very low. High-quality evidence supported sufficient positive correlations between diaphragm excursion and forced expiratory volume in the first second or forced vital capacity (r >  = 0.3) in healthy individuals. Conclusions Despite the reported sufficient reliability and validity of using ultrasonography to assess the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals, further large-scale studies are warranted to improve the quality of evidence regarding using ultrasonography for these measurements in clinical practice. Researchers should establish their own reliability before using various types of ultrasonography to evaluate respiratory muscle functions. Trial registration PROSPERO NO. CRD42022322945.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03558-yDiaphragmLow back painInspiratory muscleStiffnessUltrasoundShear wave elastography
spellingShingle Emma FengMing Zhou
Siu Ngor Fu
Chen Huang
Xiu Ping Huang
Arnold Yu Lok Wong
Reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic review
BMC Oral Health
Diaphragm
Low back pain
Inspiratory muscle
Stiffness
Ultrasound
Shear wave elastography
title Reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic review
title_full Reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic review
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic review
title_short Reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness, excursion, stiffness, and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non-hospitalized individuals: a systematic review
title_sort reliability and validity of ultrasonography in evaluating the thickness excursion stiffness and strain rate of respiratory muscles in non hospitalized individuals a systematic review
topic Diaphragm
Low back pain
Inspiratory muscle
Stiffness
Ultrasound
Shear wave elastography
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03558-y
work_keys_str_mv AT emmafengmingzhou reliabilityandvalidityofultrasonographyinevaluatingthethicknessexcursionstiffnessandstrainrateofrespiratorymusclesinnonhospitalizedindividualsasystematicreview
AT siungorfu reliabilityandvalidityofultrasonographyinevaluatingthethicknessexcursionstiffnessandstrainrateofrespiratorymusclesinnonhospitalizedindividualsasystematicreview
AT chenhuang reliabilityandvalidityofultrasonographyinevaluatingthethicknessexcursionstiffnessandstrainrateofrespiratorymusclesinnonhospitalizedindividualsasystematicreview
AT xiupinghuang reliabilityandvalidityofultrasonographyinevaluatingthethicknessexcursionstiffnessandstrainrateofrespiratorymusclesinnonhospitalizedindividualsasystematicreview
AT arnoldyulokwong reliabilityandvalidityofultrasonographyinevaluatingthethicknessexcursionstiffnessandstrainrateofrespiratorymusclesinnonhospitalizedindividualsasystematicreview