The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive Accumulation

It has long been understood by Marxists, including Marx himself, that primitive accumulation was not limited to the historical origins of capitalism. Instead, extra-economic processes of capital accumulation continue to be relevant throughout the subsequent development of capitalism. An examination...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniel Egan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pluto Journals 2022-09-01
Series:World Review of Political Economy
Online Access:https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.4.0430
_version_ 1827954718734811136
author Daniel Egan
author_facet Daniel Egan
author_sort Daniel Egan
collection DOAJ
description It has long been understood by Marxists, including Marx himself, that primitive accumulation was not limited to the historical origins of capitalism. Instead, extra-economic processes of capital accumulation continue to be relevant throughout the subsequent development of capitalism. An examination of the classic analyses of primitive accumulation made by Karl Marx and Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the most significant contemporary interpretation of the concept—David Harvey’s accumulation by dispossession—fails to properly account for the role played by war and military power in capital accumulation today. This is the product of both a problematic interpretation of Marx’s and Luxemburg’s analyses of primitive accumulation as well as a problematic interpretation of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. I argue that Marx and Luxemburg continue to offer a more fruitful foundation from which to address this question.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T14:33:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6bf5985f68f8433ebf56e6fea15c49b6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2042-891X
2042-8928
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T14:33:42Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Pluto Journals
record_format Article
series World Review of Political Economy
spelling doaj.art-6bf5985f68f8433ebf56e6fea15c49b62023-05-03T14:11:17ZengPluto JournalsWorld Review of Political Economy2042-891X2042-89282022-09-0113443044810.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.4.0430The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive AccumulationDaniel EganIt has long been understood by Marxists, including Marx himself, that primitive accumulation was not limited to the historical origins of capitalism. Instead, extra-economic processes of capital accumulation continue to be relevant throughout the subsequent development of capitalism. An examination of the classic analyses of primitive accumulation made by Karl Marx and Rosa Luxemburg suggests that the most significant contemporary interpretation of the concept—David Harvey’s accumulation by dispossession—fails to properly account for the role played by war and military power in capital accumulation today. This is the product of both a problematic interpretation of Marx’s and Luxemburg’s analyses of primitive accumulation as well as a problematic interpretation of the 2003 US invasion of Iraq. I argue that Marx and Luxemburg continue to offer a more fruitful foundation from which to address this question.https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.4.0430
spellingShingle Daniel Egan
The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive Accumulation
World Review of Political Economy
title The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive Accumulation
title_full The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive Accumulation
title_fullStr The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive Accumulation
title_full_unstemmed The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive Accumulation
title_short The Place Of War In Marxist Analyses Of Primitive Accumulation
title_sort place of war in marxist analyses of primitive accumulation
url https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.13.4.0430
work_keys_str_mv AT danielegan theplaceofwarinmarxistanalysesofprimitiveaccumulation
AT danielegan placeofwarinmarxistanalysesofprimitiveaccumulation