King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern Britain

All inaccuracies and distortions of the language use in modern British media, revealed by Simon Heffer in his book «Strictly English», enable the author of the article to draw a distinct demarcation line between King's English, the English of the press, on the one hand, and the English of the u...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tatiana A. Ivushkina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MGIMO University Press 2014-01-01
Series:Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/razdely/filologiya/korolevskiy-angliyskiy-i-aristokraticheskiy-kod-obshcheniya-v-sovremennoy
_version_ 1818153576762966016
author Tatiana A. Ivushkina
author_facet Tatiana A. Ivushkina
author_sort Tatiana A. Ivushkina
collection DOAJ
description All inaccuracies and distortions of the language use in modern British media, revealed by Simon Heffer in his book «Strictly English», enable the author of the article to draw a distinct demarcation line between King's English, the English of the press, on the one hand, and the English of the upper classes of Great Britain, on the other. The errors in the press, such as confusion of words similar in a sound form or spelling, the use of foreign words in the wrong meanings, distortions of names, etc. testify to the deterioration of education at some universities of Great Britain. They also point to the lack of a classical education based on the study of foreign languages, Greek and Latin, in the first place, which facilitates learning foreign words and mastering complicated grammar structures and subtleties of modality in the English language. The language of the press is clearly opposed to the language of the upper classes by methods of communication. If the former is characterized by direct and straightforward ways of communication, the latter manifests indirect and hidden ways of interaction. Cultivated by the upper classes and the aristocracy, this code is based on the categories of words which originate ambiguity in speech or texts and raise the eternal question «What is meant by this or that? ». In journalism these categories of words are labeled as «killers» of meaning. They include foreign words which considerably obscure understanding, abstract nouns that serve to create distance and insincerity in communication, adjectives which very often veil the real state of things, serve as a means of linguistic manipulation, especially when used to describe emotions, opinions and feelings. Here, also, belong euphemism and metaphorical meanings of nouns and verbs. The author concludes that, despite stringent prohibition for journalists to use these categories of words in the media, journalists and professional writers would only benefit if they were aware of them as well as of social connotations of words marked as U - non-U words in the book «Noblesse Oblige» by Alan Ross, Evelyn Waugh and Nancy Mitford. Heffer's book allows to clearly see the demarcation line between the English of the media and the English of the upper classes of Great Britain based on play upon words and various implications to express individuality and sense of humour, intellect and social exclusiveness.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T14:12:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6bf6cf61856041a2a1788e158c429976
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2071-8160
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T14:12:49Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher MGIMO University Press
record_format Article
series Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
spelling doaj.art-6bf6cf61856041a2a1788e158c4299762022-12-22T01:03:21ZengMGIMO University PressVestnik MGIMO-Universiteta2071-81602014-01-01363246251137King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern BritainTatiana A. Ivushkina0Московский государственный институт международных отношений (университет) МИД РоссииAll inaccuracies and distortions of the language use in modern British media, revealed by Simon Heffer in his book «Strictly English», enable the author of the article to draw a distinct demarcation line between King's English, the English of the press, on the one hand, and the English of the upper classes of Great Britain, on the other. The errors in the press, such as confusion of words similar in a sound form or spelling, the use of foreign words in the wrong meanings, distortions of names, etc. testify to the deterioration of education at some universities of Great Britain. They also point to the lack of a classical education based on the study of foreign languages, Greek and Latin, in the first place, which facilitates learning foreign words and mastering complicated grammar structures and subtleties of modality in the English language. The language of the press is clearly opposed to the language of the upper classes by methods of communication. If the former is characterized by direct and straightforward ways of communication, the latter manifests indirect and hidden ways of interaction. Cultivated by the upper classes and the aristocracy, this code is based on the categories of words which originate ambiguity in speech or texts and raise the eternal question «What is meant by this or that? ». In journalism these categories of words are labeled as «killers» of meaning. They include foreign words which considerably obscure understanding, abstract nouns that serve to create distance and insincerity in communication, adjectives which very often veil the real state of things, serve as a means of linguistic manipulation, especially when used to describe emotions, opinions and feelings. Here, also, belong euphemism and metaphorical meanings of nouns and verbs. The author concludes that, despite stringent prohibition for journalists to use these categories of words in the media, journalists and professional writers would only benefit if they were aware of them as well as of social connotations of words marked as U - non-U words in the book «Noblesse Oblige» by Alan Ross, Evelyn Waugh and Nancy Mitford. Heffer's book allows to clearly see the demarcation line between the English of the media and the English of the upper classes of Great Britain based on play upon words and various implications to express individuality and sense of humour, intellect and social exclusiveness.http://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/razdely/filologiya/korolevskiy-angliyskiy-i-aristokraticheskiy-kod-obshcheniya-v-sovremennoyязык СМИкоролевский английскийязык английской аристократииаристократический код общенияпрямой и непрямой код общенияthe English of the mediathe English of the British aristocracythe aristocratic code of communicationdirect and indirect ways of communication
spellingShingle Tatiana A. Ivushkina
King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern Britain
Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta
язык СМИ
королевский английский
язык английской аристократии
аристократический код общения
прямой и непрямой код общения
the English of the media
the English of the British aristocracy
the aristocratic code of communication
direct and indirect ways of communication
title King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern Britain
title_full King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern Britain
title_fullStr King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern Britain
title_full_unstemmed King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern Britain
title_short King's English And The Aristocratic Code Of Communication In Modern Britain
title_sort king s english and the aristocratic code of communication in modern britain
topic язык СМИ
королевский английский
язык английской аристократии
аристократический код общения
прямой и непрямой код общения
the English of the media
the English of the British aristocracy
the aristocratic code of communication
direct and indirect ways of communication
url http://www.vestnik.mgimo.ru/razdely/filologiya/korolevskiy-angliyskiy-i-aristokraticheskiy-kod-obshcheniya-v-sovremennoy
work_keys_str_mv AT tatianaaivushkina kingsenglishandthearistocraticcodeofcommunicationinmodernbritain