Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics

Abstract Most of our insights on whole‐plant transpiration (E) are based on leaf‐chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and E can be made. Water vapor pressure defi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alejandro Pieters, Marcus Giese, Marc Schmierer, Kristian Johnson, Folkard Asch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-12-01
Series:Plant-Environment Interactions
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10094
_version_ 1797974765250543616
author Alejandro Pieters
Marcus Giese
Marc Schmierer
Kristian Johnson
Folkard Asch
author_facet Alejandro Pieters
Marcus Giese
Marc Schmierer
Kristian Johnson
Folkard Asch
author_sort Alejandro Pieters
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Most of our insights on whole‐plant transpiration (E) are based on leaf‐chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and E can be made. Water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is the driving force for E but assessing its impact has been evasive, due to confounding effects of other climate drivers. We developed a chamber‐based gravimetric method, in which whole plant response of E to VPD could be assessed, while keeping other environmental parameters at predetermined values. Stable VPD values (0.5–3.7 kPa) were attained within 5 min after changing flow settings and maintained for at least 45 min. Species differing in life form and photosynthetic metabolism were used. Typical runs covering the range of VPDs lasted up to 4 h, preventing acclimation responses or soilborne water deficit. Species‐specific responses of E to VPD could be identified, as well as differences in leaf conductance. The combined gravimetric‐chamber‐based system presented overcomes several limitations of previous gravimetric set ups in terms of replicability, time, and elucidation of the impact of specific environmental drivers on E, filling a methodological gap and widening our phenotyping capabilities.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T04:24:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6bfe8a92908b4063922a0fbd78ef5426
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2575-6265
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T04:24:56Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Plant-Environment Interactions
spelling doaj.art-6bfe8a92908b4063922a0fbd78ef54262022-12-30T02:02:40ZengWileyPlant-Environment Interactions2575-62652022-12-013624325310.1002/pei3.10094Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamicsAlejandro Pieters0Marcus Giese1Marc Schmierer2Kristian Johnson3Folkard Asch4Institute for Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans‐Ruthenberg Institute) University of Hohenheim Stuttgart GermanyInstitute for Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans‐Ruthenberg Institute) University of Hohenheim Stuttgart GermanyInstitute for Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans‐Ruthenberg Institute) University of Hohenheim Stuttgart GermanyInstitute for Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans‐Ruthenberg Institute) University of Hohenheim Stuttgart GermanyInstitute for Agricultural Sciences in the Tropics (Hans‐Ruthenberg Institute) University of Hohenheim Stuttgart GermanyAbstract Most of our insights on whole‐plant transpiration (E) are based on leaf‐chamber measurements using water vapor porometers, IRGAs, or flux measurements. Gravimetric methods are integrative, accurate, and a clear differentiation between evaporation and E can be made. Water vapor pressure deficit (VPD) is the driving force for E but assessing its impact has been evasive, due to confounding effects of other climate drivers. We developed a chamber‐based gravimetric method, in which whole plant response of E to VPD could be assessed, while keeping other environmental parameters at predetermined values. Stable VPD values (0.5–3.7 kPa) were attained within 5 min after changing flow settings and maintained for at least 45 min. Species differing in life form and photosynthetic metabolism were used. Typical runs covering the range of VPDs lasted up to 4 h, preventing acclimation responses or soilborne water deficit. Species‐specific responses of E to VPD could be identified, as well as differences in leaf conductance. The combined gravimetric‐chamber‐based system presented overcomes several limitations of previous gravimetric set ups in terms of replicability, time, and elucidation of the impact of specific environmental drivers on E, filling a methodological gap and widening our phenotyping capabilities.https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10094environmental driversgravimetrytranspirationVPDwhole plant
spellingShingle Alejandro Pieters
Marcus Giese
Marc Schmierer
Kristian Johnson
Folkard Asch
Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
Plant-Environment Interactions
environmental drivers
gravimetry
transpiration
VPD
whole plant
title Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_full Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_fullStr Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_full_unstemmed Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_short Chamber‐based system for measuring whole‐plant transpiration dynamics
title_sort chamber based system for measuring whole plant transpiration dynamics
topic environmental drivers
gravimetry
transpiration
VPD
whole plant
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pei3.10094
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandropieters chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT marcusgiese chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT marcschmierer chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT kristianjohnson chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics
AT folkardasch chamberbasedsystemformeasuringwholeplanttranspirationdynamics