Halo Effect in Peer Review: Exploring the Possibility of Bias Associated with the Feeling of Belonging to a Group
Abstract In this study, we explore the possibility of bias in the article evaluation process during peer review, due to homogeneous groups of reviewers, most of whom belong to the same professional field. The conditions of the context of journals considered for the manifestation of bias are: a) arti...
Main Authors: | José Osvaldo De Sordi, Manuel Antonio Meireles |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Portuguese |
Published: |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Escola de Ciência da Informação
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-99362019000300096&tlng=en |
Similar Items
-
Open peer review: some considerations on the selection and management of reviewers
by: Andrea Capaccioni
Published: (2022-12-01) -
Scientific peer review in the modern era: A comprehensive guide
by: Nimrat Kaur Sandhu, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Weak evidence of country- and institution-related status bias in the peer review of abstracts
by: Mathias Wullum Nielsen, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01) -
Analysis of biased language in peer-reviewed scientific literature on genetically modified crops
by: Bo Maxwell Stevens, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
by: Piitu Parmanne, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)