Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?

Given that education infrastructure has been a crucial element of the infrastructural power of the welfare state, surprisingly little is known about how spatial disparities in school infrastructure have been governed. While emphasis has recently been placed on the role of numbers in governing the ed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Walter Bartl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-02-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/3/167
_version_ 1797471932990357504
author Walter Bartl
author_facet Walter Bartl
author_sort Walter Bartl
collection DOAJ
description Given that education infrastructure has been a crucial element of the infrastructural power of the welfare state, surprisingly little is known about how spatial disparities in school infrastructure have been governed. While emphasis has recently been placed on the role of numbers in governing the education system, there have been contradictory results on the use of numbers for measuring spatial disparities in schooling on the one hand and on allocating school infrastructure by numbers on the other. What role have indicators played in the governance of regional disparities in education and how can we explain changes to this role? Assuming that indicators typically fulfil two functions in decision making processes (information gathering and allocation of resources), this article develops an ideal–typical distinction between four ways of (not) using numbers for governance purposes. This typology is applied to a historical case study of indicators as a device for governing spatial disparities in education in Germany. Cognitive investments in indicators for observing spatial disparities in education and for administering schools have been made in Germany since the early 19th century. However, conceptual flaws and conservative education policies have kept them from being put to effective practice in school infrastructure policies. It was not until the 1970s that demographic and administrative indicators became institutionalized as part of decentralized but fairly standardized school planning practices. While the use of indicators in the spatial allocation of education resources seemed to work well during periods of educational expansion, this calculative practice produced tension with the civic idea of spatial justice when enrolments declined.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T19:55:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6c1b7ae820f1485f92d9049f8d58f517
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7102
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T19:55:05Z
publishDate 2022-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Education Sciences
spelling doaj.art-6c1b7ae820f1485f92d9049f8d58f5172023-11-24T00:58:59ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022022-02-0112316710.3390/educsci12030167Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?Walter Bartl0Institute of Sociology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, 06108 Halle (Saale), GermanyGiven that education infrastructure has been a crucial element of the infrastructural power of the welfare state, surprisingly little is known about how spatial disparities in school infrastructure have been governed. While emphasis has recently been placed on the role of numbers in governing the education system, there have been contradictory results on the use of numbers for measuring spatial disparities in schooling on the one hand and on allocating school infrastructure by numbers on the other. What role have indicators played in the governance of regional disparities in education and how can we explain changes to this role? Assuming that indicators typically fulfil two functions in decision making processes (information gathering and allocation of resources), this article develops an ideal–typical distinction between four ways of (not) using numbers for governance purposes. This typology is applied to a historical case study of indicators as a device for governing spatial disparities in education in Germany. Cognitive investments in indicators for observing spatial disparities in education and for administering schools have been made in Germany since the early 19th century. However, conceptual flaws and conservative education policies have kept them from being put to effective practice in school infrastructure policies. It was not until the 1970s that demographic and administrative indicators became institutionalized as part of decentralized but fairly standardized school planning practices. While the use of indicators in the spatial allocation of education resources seemed to work well during periods of educational expansion, this calculative practice produced tension with the civic idea of spatial justice when enrolments declined.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/3/167quantificationregional disparitiesgovernancespatial justiceterritorial politicseducation infrastructure
spellingShingle Walter Bartl
Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?
Education Sciences
quantification
regional disparities
governance
spatial justice
territorial politics
education infrastructure
title Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?
title_full Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?
title_fullStr Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?
title_full_unstemmed Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?
title_short Governing Spatial Disparities in School Infrastructure by Numbers: Investments in Form, Tensions, New Compromises?
title_sort governing spatial disparities in school infrastructure by numbers investments in form tensions new compromises
topic quantification
regional disparities
governance
spatial justice
territorial politics
education infrastructure
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/12/3/167
work_keys_str_mv AT walterbartl governingspatialdisparitiesinschoolinfrastructurebynumbersinvestmentsinformtensionsnewcompromises