Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, Malaysia
Kelantan is a flood-prone area where in the past years flood had occurred quite frequently. Determining a hydrological model that can represent Kelantan River basin by giving plausible simulated runoff according to the observed runoff is essential as this will allow appropriate prediction of future...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2022-01-01
|
Series: | E3S Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2022/14/e3sconf_iccee2022_04008.pdf |
_version_ | 1811332314616037376 |
---|---|
author | Soo Eugene Zhen Xiang Wan Jaafar Wan Zurina Chin Ren Jie Ling Lloyd Ng Cia Yik Prashant Srivastava |
author_facet | Soo Eugene Zhen Xiang Wan Jaafar Wan Zurina Chin Ren Jie Ling Lloyd Ng Cia Yik Prashant Srivastava |
author_sort | Soo Eugene Zhen Xiang |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Kelantan is a flood-prone area where in the past years flood had occurred quite frequently. Determining a hydrological model that can represent Kelantan River basin by giving plausible simulated runoff according to the observed runoff is essential as this will allow appropriate prediction of future flood by using forecasted rainfall and other data. In this study, the IHACRES model was used to simulate runoff and the calibrated simulated runoff by daily scale and seasonal flood events were compared with observed runoff. In general, the IHACRES model performed better in seasonal scale as compared with annual scale in terms of calibration. However, performance of IHACRES degraded during validation stage, whereby the model tends to underestimate the high peak flows but estimate rather more accurate when no peak flows were present. In terms of annual scale, the best model was obtained by calibrating the streamflow in 2012 – 2013 (2 years), the validation results were not satisfactory with NSE = 0.473 and PBIAS = 27.7%. On the other hand, for seasonal analysis, the best model was obtained by calibrating the data of NEM 6 (November 2017 – March 2018). 3 out of 5 of the validation periods show unsatisfactory results (NSE ≤ 0.50). NEM 1 (November 2012 – March 2013) show the best validation results with NSE = 0.853. Further calibration is required in order to enhance the accuracy of the model. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-13T16:34:06Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6c1e715a7d9949148de9f44332fc7085 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2267-1242 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-13T16:34:06Z |
publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
publisher | EDP Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | E3S Web of Conferences |
spelling | doaj.art-6c1e715a7d9949148de9f44332fc70852022-12-22T02:39:28ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422022-01-013470400810.1051/e3sconf/202234704008e3sconf_iccee2022_04008Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, MalaysiaSoo Eugene Zhen Xiang0Wan Jaafar Wan Zurina1Chin Ren Jie2Ling Lloyd3Ng Cia Yik4Prashant Srivastava5Department of Civil Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul RahmanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of MalayaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul RahmanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Lee Kong Chian Faculty of Engineering and Science, Universiti Tunku Abdul RahmanDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of MalayaInstitute of Environment and Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu UniversityKelantan is a flood-prone area where in the past years flood had occurred quite frequently. Determining a hydrological model that can represent Kelantan River basin by giving plausible simulated runoff according to the observed runoff is essential as this will allow appropriate prediction of future flood by using forecasted rainfall and other data. In this study, the IHACRES model was used to simulate runoff and the calibrated simulated runoff by daily scale and seasonal flood events were compared with observed runoff. In general, the IHACRES model performed better in seasonal scale as compared with annual scale in terms of calibration. However, performance of IHACRES degraded during validation stage, whereby the model tends to underestimate the high peak flows but estimate rather more accurate when no peak flows were present. In terms of annual scale, the best model was obtained by calibrating the streamflow in 2012 – 2013 (2 years), the validation results were not satisfactory with NSE = 0.473 and PBIAS = 27.7%. On the other hand, for seasonal analysis, the best model was obtained by calibrating the data of NEM 6 (November 2017 – March 2018). 3 out of 5 of the validation periods show unsatisfactory results (NSE ≤ 0.50). NEM 1 (November 2012 – March 2013) show the best validation results with NSE = 0.853. Further calibration is required in order to enhance the accuracy of the model.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2022/14/e3sconf_iccee2022_04008.pdf |
spellingShingle | Soo Eugene Zhen Xiang Wan Jaafar Wan Zurina Chin Ren Jie Ling Lloyd Ng Cia Yik Prashant Srivastava Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, Malaysia E3S Web of Conferences |
title | Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, Malaysia |
title_full | Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, Malaysia |
title_fullStr | Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, Malaysia |
title_full_unstemmed | Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, Malaysia |
title_short | Streamflow evaluation using IHACRES model in Kelantan river basin, Malaysia |
title_sort | streamflow evaluation using ihacres model in kelantan river basin malaysia |
url | https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2022/14/e3sconf_iccee2022_04008.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sooeugenezhenxiang streamflowevaluationusingihacresmodelinkelantanriverbasinmalaysia AT wanjaafarwanzurina streamflowevaluationusingihacresmodelinkelantanriverbasinmalaysia AT chinrenjie streamflowevaluationusingihacresmodelinkelantanriverbasinmalaysia AT linglloyd streamflowevaluationusingihacresmodelinkelantanriverbasinmalaysia AT ngciayik streamflowevaluationusingihacresmodelinkelantanriverbasinmalaysia AT prashantsrivastava streamflowevaluationusingihacresmodelinkelantanriverbasinmalaysia |