Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variability

When engaged in a repetitive task our performance fluctuates from trial-to-trial. In particular, inter-trial reaction time variability has been the subject of considerable research. It has been claimed to be a strong biomarker of attention deficits, increases with frontal dysfunction, and predicts a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria José Ribeiro, Joana Santos Paiva, Miguel eCastelo-Branco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00200/full
_version_ 1819054541439500288
author Maria José Ribeiro
Joana Santos Paiva
Miguel eCastelo-Branco
author_facet Maria José Ribeiro
Joana Santos Paiva
Miguel eCastelo-Branco
author_sort Maria José Ribeiro
collection DOAJ
description When engaged in a repetitive task our performance fluctuates from trial-to-trial. In particular, inter-trial reaction time variability has been the subject of considerable research. It has been claimed to be a strong biomarker of attention deficits, increases with frontal dysfunction, and predicts age-related cognitive decline. Thus, rather than being just a consequence of noise in the system, it appears to be under the control of a mechanism that breaks down under certain pathological conditions. Although the underlying mechanism is still an open question, consensual hypotheses are emerging regarding the neural correlates of reaction time inter-trial intra-individual variability. Sensory processing, in particular, has been shown to covary with reaction time, yet the spatio-temporal profile of the moment-to-moment variability in sensory processing is still poorly characterized. The goal of this study was to characterize the intra-individual variability in the time course of single-trial visual evoked potentials and its relationship with inter-trial reaction time variability. For this, we chose to take advantage of the high temporal resolution of the electroencephalogram (EEG) acquired while participants were engaged in a 2-choice reaction time task. We studied the link between single trial event-related potentials (ERPs) and reaction time using two different analyses: 1) time point by time point correlation analyses thereby identifying time windows of interest, and 2) correlation analyses between single trial measures of peak latency and amplitude and reaction time. To improve extraction of single trial ERP measures related with activation of the visual cortex, we used an independent component analysis procedure.Our ERP analysis revealed a relationship between the N1 visual evoked potential and reaction time. The earliest time point presenting a significant correlation of its respective amplitude with reaction time occurred 175 ms after stimulus onset, just after the onset of the N1 peak. Interestingly, single trial N1 latency correlated significantly with reaction time, while N1 amplitude did not.In conclusion, our findings suggest that inter-trial variability in the timing of extrastriate visual processing contributes to reaction time variability.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:53:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6c2346d67d854aada4f2ac58edf3a8dc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:53:16Z
publishDate 2016-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-6c2346d67d854aada4f2ac58edf3a8dc2022-12-21T19:03:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612016-05-011010.3389/fnhum.2016.00200183284Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variabilityMaria José Ribeiro0Joana Santos Paiva1Miguel eCastelo-Branco2IBILI, Faculty of Medicine, University of CoimbraIBILI, Faculty of Medicine, University of CoimbraIBILI, Faculty of Medicine, University of CoimbraWhen engaged in a repetitive task our performance fluctuates from trial-to-trial. In particular, inter-trial reaction time variability has been the subject of considerable research. It has been claimed to be a strong biomarker of attention deficits, increases with frontal dysfunction, and predicts age-related cognitive decline. Thus, rather than being just a consequence of noise in the system, it appears to be under the control of a mechanism that breaks down under certain pathological conditions. Although the underlying mechanism is still an open question, consensual hypotheses are emerging regarding the neural correlates of reaction time inter-trial intra-individual variability. Sensory processing, in particular, has been shown to covary with reaction time, yet the spatio-temporal profile of the moment-to-moment variability in sensory processing is still poorly characterized. The goal of this study was to characterize the intra-individual variability in the time course of single-trial visual evoked potentials and its relationship with inter-trial reaction time variability. For this, we chose to take advantage of the high temporal resolution of the electroencephalogram (EEG) acquired while participants were engaged in a 2-choice reaction time task. We studied the link between single trial event-related potentials (ERPs) and reaction time using two different analyses: 1) time point by time point correlation analyses thereby identifying time windows of interest, and 2) correlation analyses between single trial measures of peak latency and amplitude and reaction time. To improve extraction of single trial ERP measures related with activation of the visual cortex, we used an independent component analysis procedure.Our ERP analysis revealed a relationship between the N1 visual evoked potential and reaction time. The earliest time point presenting a significant correlation of its respective amplitude with reaction time occurred 175 ms after stimulus onset, just after the onset of the N1 peak. Interestingly, single trial N1 latency correlated significantly with reaction time, while N1 amplitude did not.In conclusion, our findings suggest that inter-trial variability in the timing of extrastriate visual processing contributes to reaction time variability.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00200/fullElectroencephalography (EEG)event-related potentials (ERPs)Visual Processingindependent component analysis (ICA)reaction time variabilityspontaneous behavioral variability
spellingShingle Maria José Ribeiro
Joana Santos Paiva
Miguel eCastelo-Branco
Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variability
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Electroencephalography (EEG)
event-related potentials (ERPs)
Visual Processing
independent component analysis (ICA)
reaction time variability
spontaneous behavioral variability
title Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variability
title_full Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variability
title_fullStr Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variability
title_full_unstemmed Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variability
title_short Spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within-subject reaction time variability
title_sort spontaneous fluctuations in sensory processing predict within subject reaction time variability
topic Electroencephalography (EEG)
event-related potentials (ERPs)
Visual Processing
independent component analysis (ICA)
reaction time variability
spontaneous behavioral variability
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00200/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mariajoseribeiro spontaneousfluctuationsinsensoryprocessingpredictwithinsubjectreactiontimevariability
AT joanasantospaiva spontaneousfluctuationsinsensoryprocessingpredictwithinsubjectreactiontimevariability
AT miguelecastelobranco spontaneousfluctuationsinsensoryprocessingpredictwithinsubjectreactiontimevariability