Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T.
<h4>Background</h4>Since the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) nearly four decades ago, there has been a quest for ever-higher magnetic field strengths. Strong incentives exist to do so, as increasing the magnetic field strength increases the signal-to-noise ratio of images. How...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2023-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280655 |
| _version_ | 1828012282540457984 |
|---|---|
| author | Ehsan Kazemivalipour Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh Boris Keil Yigitcan Eryaman Ergin Atalar Laleh Golestanirad |
| author_facet | Ehsan Kazemivalipour Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh Boris Keil Yigitcan Eryaman Ergin Atalar Laleh Golestanirad |
| author_sort | Ehsan Kazemivalipour |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>Since the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) nearly four decades ago, there has been a quest for ever-higher magnetic field strengths. Strong incentives exist to do so, as increasing the magnetic field strength increases the signal-to-noise ratio of images. However, ensuring patient safety becomes more challenging at high and ultrahigh field MRI (i.e., ≥3 T) compared to lower fields. The problem is exacerbated for patients with conductive implants, such as those with deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices, as excessive local heating can occur around implanted lead tips. Despite extensive effort to assess radio frequency (RF) heating of implants during MRI at 1.5 T, a comparative study that systematically examines the effects of field strength and various exposure limits on RF heating is missing.<h4>Purpose</h4>This study aims to perform numerical simulations that systematically compare RF power deposition near DBS lead models during MRI at common clinical and ultra-high field strengths, namely 1.5, 3, 7, and 10.5 T. Furthermore, we assess the effects of different exposure constraints on RF power deposition by imposing limits on either the B1+ or global head specific absorption rate (SAR) as these two exposure limits commonly appear in MRI guidelines.<h4>Methods</h4>We created 33 unique DBS lead models based on postoperative computed tomography (CT) images of patients with implanted DBS devices and performed electromagnetic simulations to evaluate the SAR of RF energy in the tissue surrounding lead tips during RF exposure at frequencies ranging from 64 MHz (1.5 T) to 447 MHz (10.5 T). The RF exposure was implemented via realistic MRI RF coil models created based on physical prototypes built in our institutions. We systematically examined the distribution of local SAR at different frequencies with the input coil power adjusted to either limit the B1+ or the global head SAR.<h4>Results</h4>The MRI RF coils at higher resonant frequencies generated lower SARs around the lead tips when the global head SAR was constrained. The trend was reversed when the constraint was imposed on B1+.<h4>Conclusion</h4>At higher static fields, MRI is not necessarily more dangerous than at lower fields for patients with conductive leads. Specifically, when a conservative safety criterion, such as constraints on the global SAR, is imposed, coils at a higher resonant frequency tend to generate a lower local SAR around implanted leads due to the decreased B1+ and, by proxy, E field levels. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T09:30:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6c3f3fd53b8547788756b45d988be0b0 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T09:30:56Z |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-6c3f3fd53b8547788756b45d988be0b02023-02-19T05:31:25ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032023-01-01181e028065510.1371/journal.pone.0280655Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T.Ehsan KazemivalipourAlireza Sadeghi-TarakamehBoris KeilYigitcan EryamanErgin AtalarLaleh Golestanirad<h4>Background</h4>Since the advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) nearly four decades ago, there has been a quest for ever-higher magnetic field strengths. Strong incentives exist to do so, as increasing the magnetic field strength increases the signal-to-noise ratio of images. However, ensuring patient safety becomes more challenging at high and ultrahigh field MRI (i.e., ≥3 T) compared to lower fields. The problem is exacerbated for patients with conductive implants, such as those with deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices, as excessive local heating can occur around implanted lead tips. Despite extensive effort to assess radio frequency (RF) heating of implants during MRI at 1.5 T, a comparative study that systematically examines the effects of field strength and various exposure limits on RF heating is missing.<h4>Purpose</h4>This study aims to perform numerical simulations that systematically compare RF power deposition near DBS lead models during MRI at common clinical and ultra-high field strengths, namely 1.5, 3, 7, and 10.5 T. Furthermore, we assess the effects of different exposure constraints on RF power deposition by imposing limits on either the B1+ or global head specific absorption rate (SAR) as these two exposure limits commonly appear in MRI guidelines.<h4>Methods</h4>We created 33 unique DBS lead models based on postoperative computed tomography (CT) images of patients with implanted DBS devices and performed electromagnetic simulations to evaluate the SAR of RF energy in the tissue surrounding lead tips during RF exposure at frequencies ranging from 64 MHz (1.5 T) to 447 MHz (10.5 T). The RF exposure was implemented via realistic MRI RF coil models created based on physical prototypes built in our institutions. We systematically examined the distribution of local SAR at different frequencies with the input coil power adjusted to either limit the B1+ or the global head SAR.<h4>Results</h4>The MRI RF coils at higher resonant frequencies generated lower SARs around the lead tips when the global head SAR was constrained. The trend was reversed when the constraint was imposed on B1+.<h4>Conclusion</h4>At higher static fields, MRI is not necessarily more dangerous than at lower fields for patients with conductive leads. Specifically, when a conservative safety criterion, such as constraints on the global SAR, is imposed, coils at a higher resonant frequency tend to generate a lower local SAR around implanted leads due to the decreased B1+ and, by proxy, E field levels.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280655 |
| spellingShingle | Ehsan Kazemivalipour Alireza Sadeghi-Tarakameh Boris Keil Yigitcan Eryaman Ergin Atalar Laleh Golestanirad Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T. PLoS ONE |
| title | Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T. |
| title_full | Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T. |
| title_fullStr | Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T. |
| title_short | Effect of field strength on RF power deposition near conductive leads: A simulation study of SAR in DBS lead models during MRI at 1.5 T-10.5 T. |
| title_sort | effect of field strength on rf power deposition near conductive leads a simulation study of sar in dbs lead models during mri at 1 5 t 10 5 t |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280655 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ehsankazemivalipour effectoffieldstrengthonrfpowerdepositionnearconductiveleadsasimulationstudyofsarindbsleadmodelsduringmriat15t105t AT alirezasadeghitarakameh effectoffieldstrengthonrfpowerdepositionnearconductiveleadsasimulationstudyofsarindbsleadmodelsduringmriat15t105t AT boriskeil effectoffieldstrengthonrfpowerdepositionnearconductiveleadsasimulationstudyofsarindbsleadmodelsduringmriat15t105t AT yigitcaneryaman effectoffieldstrengthonrfpowerdepositionnearconductiveleadsasimulationstudyofsarindbsleadmodelsduringmriat15t105t AT erginatalar effectoffieldstrengthonrfpowerdepositionnearconductiveleadsasimulationstudyofsarindbsleadmodelsduringmriat15t105t AT lalehgolestanirad effectoffieldstrengthonrfpowerdepositionnearconductiveleadsasimulationstudyofsarindbsleadmodelsduringmriat15t105t |