Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study

(1) <b>Background</b>: We aimed to investigate whether second-stage cesarean delivery (SSCD) had a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with cesarean delivery (CD) at other stages of labor and to study the association of these extensions with preterm birt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Orna Reichman, Ayala Hirsch, Shira Fridman, Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky, Sarit Helman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/3/749
_version_ 1797318600698101760
author Orna Reichman
Ayala Hirsch
Shira Fridman
Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
Sarit Helman
author_facet Orna Reichman
Ayala Hirsch
Shira Fridman
Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
Sarit Helman
author_sort Orna Reichman
collection DOAJ
description (1) <b>Background</b>: We aimed to investigate whether second-stage cesarean delivery (SSCD) had a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with cesarean delivery (CD) at other stages of labor and to study the association of these extensions with preterm birth (PTB). (2) <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study, spanning from 2006 to 2019, all selected mothers who delivered by CD at first birth (P1) and returned for second birth (P2) were grouped by cesarean stage at P1: planned CD, first-stage CD, or SSCD. Mothers with a PTB at P1, multiple-gestation pregnancies in either P1 or P2 and those with prior abortions were excluded. (3) <b>Results</b>: The study included 1574 selected women who underwent a planned CD at P1 (n = 483 (30.7%)), first-stage CD (n = 878 (55.8%), and SSCD (n = 213 (13.5%)). There was a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions among SSCD patients compared to first-stage CDs and planned CDs: 50/213 (23%), 56/878 (6.4%), and 5/483 (1%), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression showed that women undergoing an SSCD are at risk for low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with women undergoing a planned CD, OR 28.8 (CI 11.2; 74.4). We observed no association between the occurrence of a low-segment uterine incisional extension at P1 and PTB ≤ 37 gestational weeks in the subsequent delivery, with rates of 6.3% (7/111) for those with an extension compared to 4.5% (67/1463) for those without an extension (<i>p</i> = 0.41). Notably, parturients experiencing a low-segment uterine incisional extension during their first childbirth were six times more likely to have a preterm delivery before 32 weeks of gestation compared to those without extensions, with two cases (1.8%) compared to four cases (0.3%), respectively. A similar trend was observed for preterm deliveries between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, with those having extensions showing twice the prevalence of prematurity compared to those without, with a <i>p</i>-value of 0.047. (4) <b>Conclusions</b>: This study highlights that mothers undergoing SSCD experience higher prevalence of low uterine incision extensions compared to other CDs. To further ascertain whether the presence of these extensions is associated with preterm birth (PTB) in subsequent births, particularly early PTB before 34 weeks of gestation, larger-scale future studies are warranted.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T03:54:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6c3ff48e0b634a69945f4f26858f6edc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-0383
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T03:54:42Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
spelling doaj.art-6c3ff48e0b634a69945f4f26858f6edc2024-02-09T15:15:52ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832024-01-0113374910.3390/jcm13030749Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort StudyOrna Reichman0Ayala Hirsch1Shira Fridman2Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky3Sarit Helman4Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, IsraelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, IsraelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, IsraelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, IsraelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shaare Zedek Medical Centre, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 91120, Israel(1) <b>Background</b>: We aimed to investigate whether second-stage cesarean delivery (SSCD) had a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with cesarean delivery (CD) at other stages of labor and to study the association of these extensions with preterm birth (PTB). (2) <b>Methods</b>: In this retrospective longitudinal follow-up cohort study, spanning from 2006 to 2019, all selected mothers who delivered by CD at first birth (P1) and returned for second birth (P2) were grouped by cesarean stage at P1: planned CD, first-stage CD, or SSCD. Mothers with a PTB at P1, multiple-gestation pregnancies in either P1 or P2 and those with prior abortions were excluded. (3) <b>Results</b>: The study included 1574 selected women who underwent a planned CD at P1 (n = 483 (30.7%)), first-stage CD (n = 878 (55.8%), and SSCD (n = 213 (13.5%)). There was a higher occurrence of low-segment uterine incision extensions among SSCD patients compared to first-stage CDs and planned CDs: 50/213 (23%), 56/878 (6.4%), and 5/483 (1%), respectively (<i>p</i> < 0.001). A multivariate logistic regression showed that women undergoing an SSCD are at risk for low-segment uterine incision extensions compared with women undergoing a planned CD, OR 28.8 (CI 11.2; 74.4). We observed no association between the occurrence of a low-segment uterine incisional extension at P1 and PTB ≤ 37 gestational weeks in the subsequent delivery, with rates of 6.3% (7/111) for those with an extension compared to 4.5% (67/1463) for those without an extension (<i>p</i> = 0.41). Notably, parturients experiencing a low-segment uterine incisional extension during their first childbirth were six times more likely to have a preterm delivery before 32 weeks of gestation compared to those without extensions, with two cases (1.8%) compared to four cases (0.3%), respectively. A similar trend was observed for preterm deliveries between 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, with those having extensions showing twice the prevalence of prematurity compared to those without, with a <i>p</i>-value of 0.047. (4) <b>Conclusions</b>: This study highlights that mothers undergoing SSCD experience higher prevalence of low uterine incision extensions compared to other CDs. To further ascertain whether the presence of these extensions is associated with preterm birth (PTB) in subsequent births, particularly early PTB before 34 weeks of gestation, larger-scale future studies are warranted.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/3/749second-stage cesarean deliverylower uterine incision extensionspreterm birth
spellingShingle Orna Reichman
Ayala Hirsch
Shira Fridman
Sorina Grisaru-Granovsky
Sarit Helman
Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
Journal of Clinical Medicine
second-stage cesarean delivery
lower uterine incision extensions
preterm birth
title Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
title_full Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
title_fullStr Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
title_short Cesarean Uterine Lacerations and Prematurity in the Following Delivery: A Retrospective Longitudinal Follow-Up Cohort Study
title_sort cesarean uterine lacerations and prematurity in the following delivery a retrospective longitudinal follow up cohort study
topic second-stage cesarean delivery
lower uterine incision extensions
preterm birth
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/3/749
work_keys_str_mv AT ornareichman cesareanuterinelacerationsandprematurityinthefollowingdeliveryaretrospectivelongitudinalfollowupcohortstudy
AT ayalahirsch cesareanuterinelacerationsandprematurityinthefollowingdeliveryaretrospectivelongitudinalfollowupcohortstudy
AT shirafridman cesareanuterinelacerationsandprematurityinthefollowingdeliveryaretrospectivelongitudinalfollowupcohortstudy
AT sorinagrisarugranovsky cesareanuterinelacerationsandprematurityinthefollowingdeliveryaretrospectivelongitudinalfollowupcohortstudy
AT sarithelman cesareanuterinelacerationsandprematurityinthefollowingdeliveryaretrospectivelongitudinalfollowupcohortstudy