Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural History
Background Limited data are available on mid‐range ejection fraction (mrEF) patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We sought to define the characteristics, evolution, and long‐term prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy patients with mrEF at diagnosis. Methods and Results We analyzed all dilated cardiom...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.010705 |
_version_ | 1819178112534970368 |
---|---|
author | Piero Gentile Marco Merlo Antonio Cannatà Marco Gobbo Jessica Artico Davide Stolfo Marta Gigli Federica Ramani Giulia Barbati Bruno Pinamonti Gianfranco Sinagra |
author_facet | Piero Gentile Marco Merlo Antonio Cannatà Marco Gobbo Jessica Artico Davide Stolfo Marta Gigli Federica Ramani Giulia Barbati Bruno Pinamonti Gianfranco Sinagra |
author_sort | Piero Gentile |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Background Limited data are available on mid‐range ejection fraction (mrEF) patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We sought to define the characteristics, evolution, and long‐term prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy patients with mrEF at diagnosis. Methods and Results We analyzed all dilated cardiomyopathy patients consecutively evaluated in the Trieste Heart Muscle Disease Registry from 1988 to 2013. mrEF and reduced ejection fraction (rEF) were defined as baseline left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction values between 40% and 49% and <40%, respectively. All‐cause mortality or heart transplantation, sudden cardiac death, or major ventricular arrhythmias were considered as outcome measures. Worsening LV ejection fraction (reduction to <40%) during follow‐up was also considered to identify possible predictors of adverse remodeling. Among 812 enrolled patients, 175 (22%) presented with mrEF at presentation. At baseline, as compared with the rEF group, mrEF patients had lower rates of moderate–severe mitral regurgitation and restrictive LV filling pattern. During a median follow‐up period of 120 (60–204) months, the mrEF group presented a lower rate of death/heart transplantation (9% versus 36%, P<0.001) and sudden cardiac death or major ventricular arrhythmias (4.5% versus 15%, P<0.001) than rEF patients. Moreover, 29 out of 175 mrEF patients (17%) evolved to rEF. Restrictive LV filling pattern emerged as the strongest predictor of rEF development following multivariable analysis. Conclusions mrEF identified a consistent subgroup of dilated cardiomyopathy patients diagnosed in an earlier stage with subsequent apparent better long‐term evolution. However, 17% of these patients evolved into rEF despite the use of medical therapy. A baseline restrictive LV filling pattern was independently associated with subsequent evolution to rEF. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:37:22Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6c56b73a76ce4094a6a34bed9b351f22 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2047-9980 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T21:37:22Z |
publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease |
spelling | doaj.art-6c56b73a76ce4094a6a34bed9b351f222022-12-21T18:11:42ZengWileyJournal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease2047-99802019-09-0181710.1161/JAHA.118.010705Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural HistoryPiero Gentile0Marco Merlo1Antonio Cannatà2Marco Gobbo3Jessica Artico4Davide Stolfo5Marta Gigli6Federica Ramani7Giulia Barbati8Bruno Pinamonti9Gianfranco Sinagra10Cardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyBiostatistics Unit Department of Medical Sciences University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyCardiothoracic Department Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste and University of Trieste ItalyBackground Limited data are available on mid‐range ejection fraction (mrEF) patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. We sought to define the characteristics, evolution, and long‐term prognosis of dilated cardiomyopathy patients with mrEF at diagnosis. Methods and Results We analyzed all dilated cardiomyopathy patients consecutively evaluated in the Trieste Heart Muscle Disease Registry from 1988 to 2013. mrEF and reduced ejection fraction (rEF) were defined as baseline left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction values between 40% and 49% and <40%, respectively. All‐cause mortality or heart transplantation, sudden cardiac death, or major ventricular arrhythmias were considered as outcome measures. Worsening LV ejection fraction (reduction to <40%) during follow‐up was also considered to identify possible predictors of adverse remodeling. Among 812 enrolled patients, 175 (22%) presented with mrEF at presentation. At baseline, as compared with the rEF group, mrEF patients had lower rates of moderate–severe mitral regurgitation and restrictive LV filling pattern. During a median follow‐up period of 120 (60–204) months, the mrEF group presented a lower rate of death/heart transplantation (9% versus 36%, P<0.001) and sudden cardiac death or major ventricular arrhythmias (4.5% versus 15%, P<0.001) than rEF patients. Moreover, 29 out of 175 mrEF patients (17%) evolved to rEF. Restrictive LV filling pattern emerged as the strongest predictor of rEF development following multivariable analysis. Conclusions mrEF identified a consistent subgroup of dilated cardiomyopathy patients diagnosed in an earlier stage with subsequent apparent better long‐term evolution. However, 17% of these patients evolved into rEF despite the use of medical therapy. A baseline restrictive LV filling pattern was independently associated with subsequent evolution to rEF.https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.010705dilated cardiomyopathyheart failuremid‐range ejection fractionprognosis |
spellingShingle | Piero Gentile Marco Merlo Antonio Cannatà Marco Gobbo Jessica Artico Davide Stolfo Marta Gigli Federica Ramani Giulia Barbati Bruno Pinamonti Gianfranco Sinagra Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural History Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure mid‐range ejection fraction prognosis |
title | Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural History |
title_full | Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural History |
title_fullStr | Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural History |
title_full_unstemmed | Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural History |
title_short | Dilated Cardiomyopathy With Mid‐Range Ejection Fraction at Diagnosis: Characterization and Natural History |
title_sort | dilated cardiomyopathy with mid range ejection fraction at diagnosis characterization and natural history |
topic | dilated cardiomyopathy heart failure mid‐range ejection fraction prognosis |
url | https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.118.010705 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pierogentile dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT marcomerlo dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT antoniocannata dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT marcogobbo dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT jessicaartico dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT davidestolfo dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT martagigli dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT federicaramani dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT giuliabarbati dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT brunopinamonti dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory AT gianfrancosinagra dilatedcardiomyopathywithmidrangeejectionfractionatdiagnosischaracterizationandnaturalhistory |