Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping

Ecosystem services (ES) and urban services (US) can comparably improve human well-being. Models for integrating ES and US with unexpressed and objective needs of defined groups of stakeholders may prove helpful for supporting decisions in landscape planning and management. In fact, they could be app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sara Antognelli, Marco Vizzari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-09-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8232
_version_ 1797521587127189504
author Sara Antognelli
Marco Vizzari
author_facet Sara Antognelli
Marco Vizzari
author_sort Sara Antognelli
collection DOAJ
description Ecosystem services (ES) and urban services (US) can comparably improve human well-being. Models for integrating ES and US with unexpressed and objective needs of defined groups of stakeholders may prove helpful for supporting decisions in landscape planning and management. In fact, they could be applied for highlighting landscape areas with different characteristics in terms of services provided. From this base, a suitability spatial assessment model (SUSAM) was developed and applied in a study area considering different verisimilar scenarios that policy makers could analyse. Each scenario is based on the prioritization of a set of services considering a defined group of stakeholders. Consistent and comparable ES and US indices of spatial benefiting areas (SBA) of services were calculated using GIS spatialization techniques. These indices were aggregated hierarchically with the relevance of services according to a spatial multicriteria decision analysis (S-MCDA). Results include maps for each scenario showing detailed spatial indices of suitability that integrate the local availability of SBA of ES and US, along with their relevance. The results were compared with known landscape classes identified in previous studies, which made it possible to interpret the spatial variation of suitability in the light of known landscape features. A complete sensitivity analysis was performed to test the sensitiveness of the model’s outputs to variations of judgements and their resistance to the indicators’ variation. The application of the model demonstrated its effectiveness in a landscape suitability assessment. At the same time, the sensitivity analysis and helping to understand the model behaviour in the different landscape classes also suggested possible solutions for simplifying the whole methodology.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T08:15:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6c57f6e7f01b462a9a265ae499614405
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-3417
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T08:15:39Z
publishDate 2021-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Applied Sciences
spelling doaj.art-6c57f6e7f01b462a9a265ae4996144052023-11-22T10:23:41ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-09-011117823210.3390/app11178232Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability MappingSara Antognelli0Marco Vizzari1Agricolus SRL, Via Settevalli, 320, 06129 Perugia, ItalyDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia, 06121 Perugia, ItalyEcosystem services (ES) and urban services (US) can comparably improve human well-being. Models for integrating ES and US with unexpressed and objective needs of defined groups of stakeholders may prove helpful for supporting decisions in landscape planning and management. In fact, they could be applied for highlighting landscape areas with different characteristics in terms of services provided. From this base, a suitability spatial assessment model (SUSAM) was developed and applied in a study area considering different verisimilar scenarios that policy makers could analyse. Each scenario is based on the prioritization of a set of services considering a defined group of stakeholders. Consistent and comparable ES and US indices of spatial benefiting areas (SBA) of services were calculated using GIS spatialization techniques. These indices were aggregated hierarchically with the relevance of services according to a spatial multicriteria decision analysis (S-MCDA). Results include maps for each scenario showing detailed spatial indices of suitability that integrate the local availability of SBA of ES and US, along with their relevance. The results were compared with known landscape classes identified in previous studies, which made it possible to interpret the spatial variation of suitability in the light of known landscape features. A complete sensitivity analysis was performed to test the sensitiveness of the model’s outputs to variations of judgements and their resistance to the indicators’ variation. The application of the model demonstrated its effectiveness in a landscape suitability assessment. At the same time, the sensitivity analysis and helping to understand the model behaviour in the different landscape classes also suggested possible solutions for simplifying the whole methodology.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8232landscape planninglandscape liveabilitylandscape servicesecosystem and urban servicesmulticriteria decision analysisanalytical hierarchy process
spellingShingle Sara Antognelli
Marco Vizzari
Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping
Applied Sciences
landscape planning
landscape liveability
landscape services
ecosystem and urban services
multicriteria decision analysis
analytical hierarchy process
title Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping
title_full Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping
title_fullStr Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping
title_full_unstemmed Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping
title_short Assessing Ecosystem and Urban Services for Landscape Suitability Mapping
title_sort assessing ecosystem and urban services for landscape suitability mapping
topic landscape planning
landscape liveability
landscape services
ecosystem and urban services
multicriteria decision analysis
analytical hierarchy process
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/17/8232
work_keys_str_mv AT saraantognelli assessingecosystemandurbanservicesforlandscapesuitabilitymapping
AT marcovizzari assessingecosystemandurbanservicesforlandscapesuitabilitymapping