Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.

BACKGROUND: Living systems are associated with Social networks - networks made up of nodes, some of which may be more important in various aspects as compared to others. While different quantitative measures labeled as "centralities" have previously been used in the network analysis commun...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Komal Batool, Muaz A Niazi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3977855?pdf=render
_version_ 1818899887877521408
author Komal Batool
Muaz A Niazi
author_facet Komal Batool
Muaz A Niazi
author_sort Komal Batool
collection DOAJ
description BACKGROUND: Living systems are associated with Social networks - networks made up of nodes, some of which may be more important in various aspects as compared to others. While different quantitative measures labeled as "centralities" have previously been used in the network analysis community to find out influential nodes in a network, it is debatable how valid the centrality measures actually are. In other words, the research question that remains unanswered is: how exactly do these measures perform in the real world? So, as an example, if a centrality of a particular node identifies it to be important, is the node actually important? PURPOSE: The goal of this paper is not just to perform a traditional social network analysis but rather to evaluate different centrality measures by conducting an empirical study analyzing exactly how do network centralities correlate with data from published multidisciplinary network data sets. METHOD: We take standard published network data sets while using a random network to establish a baseline. These data sets included the Zachary's Karate Club network, dolphin social network and a neural network of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Each of the data sets was analyzed in terms of different centrality measures and compared with existing knowledge from associated published articles to review the role of each centrality measure in the determination of influential nodes. RESULTS: Our empirical analysis demonstrates that in the chosen network data sets, nodes which had a high Closeness Centrality also had a high Eccentricity Centrality. Likewise high Degree Centrality also correlated closely with a high Eigenvector Centrality. Whereas Betweenness Centrality varied according to network topology and did not demonstrate any noticeable pattern. In terms of identification of key nodes, we discovered that as compared with other centrality measures, Eigenvector and Eccentricity Centralities were better able to identify important nodes.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T19:55:07Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6c5a1058d0014f29a62bf90995789b4c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T19:55:07Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6c5a1058d0014f29a62bf90995789b4c2022-12-21T20:07:50ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0194e9028310.1371/journal.pone.0090283Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.Komal BatoolMuaz A NiaziBACKGROUND: Living systems are associated with Social networks - networks made up of nodes, some of which may be more important in various aspects as compared to others. While different quantitative measures labeled as "centralities" have previously been used in the network analysis community to find out influential nodes in a network, it is debatable how valid the centrality measures actually are. In other words, the research question that remains unanswered is: how exactly do these measures perform in the real world? So, as an example, if a centrality of a particular node identifies it to be important, is the node actually important? PURPOSE: The goal of this paper is not just to perform a traditional social network analysis but rather to evaluate different centrality measures by conducting an empirical study analyzing exactly how do network centralities correlate with data from published multidisciplinary network data sets. METHOD: We take standard published network data sets while using a random network to establish a baseline. These data sets included the Zachary's Karate Club network, dolphin social network and a neural network of nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Each of the data sets was analyzed in terms of different centrality measures and compared with existing knowledge from associated published articles to review the role of each centrality measure in the determination of influential nodes. RESULTS: Our empirical analysis demonstrates that in the chosen network data sets, nodes which had a high Closeness Centrality also had a high Eccentricity Centrality. Likewise high Degree Centrality also correlated closely with a high Eigenvector Centrality. Whereas Betweenness Centrality varied according to network topology and did not demonstrate any noticeable pattern. In terms of identification of key nodes, we discovered that as compared with other centrality measures, Eigenvector and Eccentricity Centralities were better able to identify important nodes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3977855?pdf=render
spellingShingle Komal Batool
Muaz A Niazi
Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.
PLoS ONE
title Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.
title_full Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.
title_fullStr Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.
title_full_unstemmed Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.
title_short Towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks.
title_sort towards a methodology for validation of centrality measures in complex networks
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3977855?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT komalbatool towardsamethodologyforvalidationofcentralitymeasuresincomplexnetworks
AT muazaniazi towardsamethodologyforvalidationofcentralitymeasuresincomplexnetworks