Combining the Devil’s Advocate Approach and Verifiability Approach to Assess Veracity in Opinion Statements
Aim: We examined the ability to detect lying about opinions with the Devil’s Advocate Approach and Verifiability Approach. Method: Interviewees were first asked an opinion eliciting question to argue in favour of their alleged personal view. This was followed by a devil’s advocate question to argue...
Main Authors: | Sharon Leal, Aldert Vrija, Haneen Deeb, Oliwia Dabrowna, Ronald P. Fisher |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedad Española de Psicología Jurídica y Forense
2023-07-01
|
Series: | European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc/art/ejpalc2023a6
|
Similar Items
-
Verbal Cues to Deceit when Lying through Omitting Information: Examining the Effect of a Model Statement Interview Protocol
by: Sharon Leal, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Exposing Suspects to Their Sketches in Repeated Interviews to Elicit Information and Veracity Cues
by: Haneen Deeb, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Approbation of Pedagogical Communication Scales for Educational Online Interaction in Russian Universities
by: Natalia Riapina, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
The Effect of Using Countermeasures in Interpreter-Absent and Interpreter-Present Interviews
by: Aldert Vrij, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
A Functional Review of Research on Clarity, Immediacy, and Credibility of Teachers and Their Impacts on Motivation and Engagement of Students
by: Jin Zheng
Published: (2021-06-01)