Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

Studies using mothers' self-reported information on birth and pregnancy characteristics are common, but the validity of such data is uncertain. We evaluated questionnaire data from the RHINE III study on reproductive health provided by 715 mothers from Bergen, Norway, about their 1629 births be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Svein Magne Skulstad, Jannicke Igland, Ane Johannessen, Randi Jacobsen Bertelsen, Marianne Lønnebotn, Ernst Reidar Omenaas, Cecilie Svanes, Francisco Gomez Real
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5544234?pdf=render
_version_ 1818490999940317184
author Svein Magne Skulstad
Jannicke Igland
Ane Johannessen
Randi Jacobsen Bertelsen
Marianne Lønnebotn
Ernst Reidar Omenaas
Cecilie Svanes
Francisco Gomez Real
author_facet Svein Magne Skulstad
Jannicke Igland
Ane Johannessen
Randi Jacobsen Bertelsen
Marianne Lønnebotn
Ernst Reidar Omenaas
Cecilie Svanes
Francisco Gomez Real
author_sort Svein Magne Skulstad
collection DOAJ
description Studies using mothers' self-reported information on birth and pregnancy characteristics are common, but the validity of such data is uncertain. We evaluated questionnaire data from the RHINE III study on reproductive health provided by 715 mothers from Bergen, Norway, about their 1629 births between 1967 and 2010, using the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) as gold standard. Validity of dichotomous variables (gender, preterm birth [<37 weeks' gestation], postterm birth [>42 weeks' gestation], induction of labour, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, caesarean section, were assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and Cohen's kappa. Paired t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were used to validate birthweight, stratified by mother's level of education, parity, birth year and child's asthma status. Child's gender and caesarean section showed high degree of validity (kappa = 0.99, sensitivity and specificity 100%). Instrumental delivery and extremely preterm birth showed good agreement with sensitivity 75-92%. Preterm birth and induction of labour showed moderate agreement. Post-term delivery was poorly reported. The validity appeared to be independent of recall time over 45 years, and of the child's asthma status. Maternally reported birth and pregnancy information is feasible and cheap, showed high validity for important birth and pregnancy parameters, and showed similar risk-associations compared to registry data.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:24:27Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6c6c23d426714988a48b3c33bbceacc7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:24:27Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6c6c23d426714988a48b3c33bbceacc72022-12-22T01:39:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01128e018179410.1371/journal.pone.0181794Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.Svein Magne SkulstadJannicke IglandAne JohannessenRandi Jacobsen BertelsenMarianne LønnebotnErnst Reidar OmenaasCecilie SvanesFrancisco Gomez RealStudies using mothers' self-reported information on birth and pregnancy characteristics are common, but the validity of such data is uncertain. We evaluated questionnaire data from the RHINE III study on reproductive health provided by 715 mothers from Bergen, Norway, about their 1629 births between 1967 and 2010, using the Medical Birth Registry of Norway (MBRN) as gold standard. Validity of dichotomous variables (gender, preterm birth [<37 weeks' gestation], postterm birth [>42 weeks' gestation], induction of labour, forceps delivery, vacuum delivery, caesarean section, were assessed by sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and Cohen's kappa. Paired t-test, Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman plots were used to validate birthweight, stratified by mother's level of education, parity, birth year and child's asthma status. Child's gender and caesarean section showed high degree of validity (kappa = 0.99, sensitivity and specificity 100%). Instrumental delivery and extremely preterm birth showed good agreement with sensitivity 75-92%. Preterm birth and induction of labour showed moderate agreement. Post-term delivery was poorly reported. The validity appeared to be independent of recall time over 45 years, and of the child's asthma status. Maternally reported birth and pregnancy information is feasible and cheap, showed high validity for important birth and pregnancy parameters, and showed similar risk-associations compared to registry data.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5544234?pdf=render
spellingShingle Svein Magne Skulstad
Jannicke Igland
Ane Johannessen
Randi Jacobsen Bertelsen
Marianne Lønnebotn
Ernst Reidar Omenaas
Cecilie Svanes
Francisco Gomez Real
Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
PLoS ONE
title Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
title_full Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
title_fullStr Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
title_full_unstemmed Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
title_short Validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the Medical Birth Registry of Norway.
title_sort validation of maternal reported pregnancy and birth characteristics against the medical birth registry of norway
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5544234?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT sveinmagneskulstad validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway
AT jannickeigland validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway
AT anejohannessen validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway
AT randijacobsenbertelsen validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway
AT mariannelønnebotn validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway
AT ernstreidaromenaas validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway
AT ceciliesvanes validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway
AT franciscogomezreal validationofmaternalreportedpregnancyandbirthcharacteristicsagainstthemedicalbirthregistryofnorway