Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF survey

Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) often co‐exists with renal function (RF) impairment. We investigated the characteristics and management of AF patients across creatinine clearance strata and potential changes in the use of nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) according to different eq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monika Kozieł, Stefan Simovic, Nikola Pavlovic, Milan Nedeljkovic, Aleksandar Kocijancic, Vilma Paparisto, Ljilja Music, Elina Trendafilova, Anca Rodica Dan, Sime Manola, Zumreta Kusljugic, Gheorghe‐Andrei Dan, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Tatjana S. Potpara, the BALKAN‐AF Investigators
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-10-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12404
_version_ 1828825579719229440
author Monika Kozieł
Stefan Simovic
Nikola Pavlovic
Milan Nedeljkovic
Aleksandar Kocijancic
Vilma Paparisto
Ljilja Music
Elina Trendafilova
Anca Rodica Dan
Sime Manola
Zumreta Kusljugic
Gheorghe‐Andrei Dan
Gregory Y. H. Lip
Tatjana S. Potpara
the BALKAN‐AF Investigators
author_facet Monika Kozieł
Stefan Simovic
Nikola Pavlovic
Milan Nedeljkovic
Aleksandar Kocijancic
Vilma Paparisto
Ljilja Music
Elina Trendafilova
Anca Rodica Dan
Sime Manola
Zumreta Kusljugic
Gheorghe‐Andrei Dan
Gregory Y. H. Lip
Tatjana S. Potpara
the BALKAN‐AF Investigators
author_sort Monika Kozieł
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) often co‐exists with renal function (RF) impairment. We investigated the characteristics and management of AF patients across creatinine clearance strata and potential changes in the use of nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) according to different equations for estimation of RF. Methods In this post hoc analysis of the BALKAN‐AF survey, patients were classified according to RF (Cockcroft‐Gault formula) as: preserved/mildly depressed RF (P‐RF) ≥50 mL/min, moderately depressed RF (MD‐RF) 30‐49 mL/min, and severely depressed RF (SD‐RF) <30 mL/min. Results Of 2712 enrolled patients, 2062 (76.0%) had data on RF. Patients with SD‐RF and MD‐RF were older, had higher mean value of European Heart Rhythm Association score, stroke and bleeding risk scores, and more comorbidities than patients with P‐RF (all P < .05). They received oral anticoagulants (OAC), AF catheter ablation, and electrical cardioversion less often than those with P‐RF (all P < .05). Rate control, no OAC, single‐antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) alone, and loop diuretics were more prevalent in patients with SD‐RF and MD‐RF than in subjects with P‐RF (all P < .005). An important change in NOAC therapy could appear in <1% of patients (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) and in <1% of patients (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration group formula). Conclusions Patients with SD‐RF and MD‐RF were older, more symptomatic, had higher stroke and bleeding risk and more comorbidities than those with P‐RF. They were less likely to receive OAC and more likely to use rate control strategy, SAPT alone, and no OAC than subjects with P‐RF.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T14:20:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6c901c9e4cda4e139b248e183fb1c2a0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1880-4276
1883-2148
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T14:20:44Z
publishDate 2020-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Journal of Arrhythmia
spelling doaj.art-6c901c9e4cda4e139b248e183fb1c2a02022-12-22T00:21:48ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42761883-21482020-10-0136586387310.1002/joa3.12404Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF surveyMonika Kozieł0Stefan Simovic1Nikola Pavlovic2Milan Nedeljkovic3Aleksandar Kocijancic4Vilma Paparisto5Ljilja Music6Elina Trendafilova7Anca Rodica Dan8Sime Manola9Zumreta Kusljugic10Gheorghe‐Andrei Dan11Gregory Y. H. Lip12Tatjana S. Potpara13the BALKAN‐AF InvestigatorsLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital Liverpool UKCardiology Clinic University Clinical Center of Kragujevac Kragujevac SerbiaClinical Center Sestre Milosrdnice Zagreb CroatiaCardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaCardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaClinic of Cardiology University Hospital Center Mother Theresa Tirana AlbaniaCardiology Clinic University Clinical Center of MontenegroUniversity of PodgoricaMedical Faculty Podgorica MontenegroCoronary Care Unit National Heart Hospital Sofia BulgariaCardiology Department Colentina University Hospital Bucharest RomaniaClinical Center Sestre Milosrdnice Zagreb CroatiaCardiology Department Clinic of Internal Medicine Medical Faculty University Clinical Center Tuzla Tuzla Bosnia and HerzegovinaMedicine University "Carol Davila"Colentina University Hospital Bucharest RomaniaLiverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science University of Liverpool and Liverpool Heart & Chest Hospital Liverpool UKCardiology Clinic Clinical Center of Serbia Belgrade SerbiaAbstract Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) often co‐exists with renal function (RF) impairment. We investigated the characteristics and management of AF patients across creatinine clearance strata and potential changes in the use of nonvitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) according to different equations for estimation of RF. Methods In this post hoc analysis of the BALKAN‐AF survey, patients were classified according to RF (Cockcroft‐Gault formula) as: preserved/mildly depressed RF (P‐RF) ≥50 mL/min, moderately depressed RF (MD‐RF) 30‐49 mL/min, and severely depressed RF (SD‐RF) <30 mL/min. Results Of 2712 enrolled patients, 2062 (76.0%) had data on RF. Patients with SD‐RF and MD‐RF were older, had higher mean value of European Heart Rhythm Association score, stroke and bleeding risk scores, and more comorbidities than patients with P‐RF (all P < .05). They received oral anticoagulants (OAC), AF catheter ablation, and electrical cardioversion less often than those with P‐RF (all P < .05). Rate control, no OAC, single‐antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) alone, and loop diuretics were more prevalent in patients with SD‐RF and MD‐RF than in subjects with P‐RF (all P < .005). An important change in NOAC therapy could appear in <1% of patients (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula) and in <1% of patients (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration group formula). Conclusions Patients with SD‐RF and MD‐RF were older, more symptomatic, had higher stroke and bleeding risk and more comorbidities than those with P‐RF. They were less likely to receive OAC and more likely to use rate control strategy, SAPT alone, and no OAC than subjects with P‐RF.https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12404atrial fibrillationBALKAN‐AF surveycreatinine clearanceoral anticoagulant therapyrenal function
spellingShingle Monika Kozieł
Stefan Simovic
Nikola Pavlovic
Milan Nedeljkovic
Aleksandar Kocijancic
Vilma Paparisto
Ljilja Music
Elina Trendafilova
Anca Rodica Dan
Sime Manola
Zumreta Kusljugic
Gheorghe‐Andrei Dan
Gregory Y. H. Lip
Tatjana S. Potpara
the BALKAN‐AF Investigators
Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF survey
Journal of Arrhythmia
atrial fibrillation
BALKAN‐AF survey
creatinine clearance
oral anticoagulant therapy
renal function
title Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF survey
title_full Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF survey
title_fullStr Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF survey
title_full_unstemmed Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF survey
title_short Treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation: The BALKAN‐AF survey
title_sort treatment implications of renal disease in patients with atrial fibrillation the balkan af survey
topic atrial fibrillation
BALKAN‐AF survey
creatinine clearance
oral anticoagulant therapy
renal function
url https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12404
work_keys_str_mv AT monikakozieł treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT stefansimovic treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT nikolapavlovic treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT milannedeljkovic treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT aleksandarkocijancic treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT vilmapaparisto treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT ljiljamusic treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT elinatrendafilova treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT ancarodicadan treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT simemanola treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT zumretakusljugic treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT gheorgheandreidan treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT gregoryyhlip treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT tatjanaspotpara treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey
AT thebalkanafinvestigators treatmentimplicationsofrenaldiseaseinpatientswithatrialfibrillationthebalkanafsurvey