Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists

Despite efforts to improve patient experience (PX), little is known about the perspective of hospitalists regarding PX initiatives and priorities. A survey was distributed to hospitalist groups across the country assessing involvement in PX initiatives and their perceived effectiveness, what PX mean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafina Khateeb MD, MBA, SFHM, FACP, Angela Keniston MSPH, Amber Moore MD, MPH, Christine Hrach MD, SFHM, Kimberly A Indovina MD, Patrick Kneeland MD, Mark Rudolph MD, SFHM, Marisha Burden MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-12-01
Series:Journal of Patient Experience
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520948669
_version_ 1811294862868217856
author Rafina Khateeb MD, MBA, SFHM, FACP
Angela Keniston MSPH
Amber Moore MD, MPH
Christine Hrach MD, SFHM
Kimberly A Indovina MD
Patrick Kneeland MD
Mark Rudolph MD, SFHM
Marisha Burden MD
author_facet Rafina Khateeb MD, MBA, SFHM, FACP
Angela Keniston MSPH
Amber Moore MD, MPH
Christine Hrach MD, SFHM
Kimberly A Indovina MD
Patrick Kneeland MD
Mark Rudolph MD, SFHM
Marisha Burden MD
author_sort Rafina Khateeb MD, MBA, SFHM, FACP
collection DOAJ
description Despite efforts to improve patient experience (PX), little is known about the perspective of hospitalists regarding PX initiatives and priorities. A survey was distributed to hospitalist groups across the country assessing involvement in PX initiatives and their perceived effectiveness, what PX means to providers, and facilitators/barriers in improving PX. Ninety-nine percent of respondents had encountered some improvement activity around PX. The most prevalent were communication training, group Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data, and interdisciplinary bedside rounding. Respondents rated most initiatives a 5 to 6 out of 10 for their effectiveness, with the perception of effectiveness increasing with respondents’ assessment of patient experience priority. Learning about others’ experiences in improving PX and learning about potential collaborations for quality improvement or research in these areas were areas of interest for future work. Qualitative work highlighted potential barriers in improving PX such as workload and staffing constraints, uncontrollable environmental factors, and unrealistic patient expectations. Improving PX is a priority, and there are many initiatives in place with perceived variable success and perceived barriers in improving PX.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:24:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6cb5fcb1227a40c5bf603d7ef9b97e06
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2374-3735
2374-3743
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:24:43Z
publishDate 2020-12-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient Experience
spelling doaj.art-6cb5fcb1227a40c5bf603d7ef9b97e062022-12-22T03:00:38ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Patient Experience2374-37352374-37432020-12-01710.1177/2374373520948669Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of HospitalistsRafina Khateeb MD, MBA, SFHM, FACP0Angela Keniston MSPH1Amber Moore MD, MPH2Christine Hrach MD, SFHM3Kimberly A Indovina MD4Patrick Kneeland MD5Mark Rudolph MD, SFHM6Marisha Burden MD7 Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA Division of Hospital Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA Division of Hospitalist Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA Denver Health, Denver, CO, USA Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA Sound Physicians, Tacoma, WA, USA Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USADespite efforts to improve patient experience (PX), little is known about the perspective of hospitalists regarding PX initiatives and priorities. A survey was distributed to hospitalist groups across the country assessing involvement in PX initiatives and their perceived effectiveness, what PX means to providers, and facilitators/barriers in improving PX. Ninety-nine percent of respondents had encountered some improvement activity around PX. The most prevalent were communication training, group Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems data, and interdisciplinary bedside rounding. Respondents rated most initiatives a 5 to 6 out of 10 for their effectiveness, with the perception of effectiveness increasing with respondents’ assessment of patient experience priority. Learning about others’ experiences in improving PX and learning about potential collaborations for quality improvement or research in these areas were areas of interest for future work. Qualitative work highlighted potential barriers in improving PX such as workload and staffing constraints, uncontrollable environmental factors, and unrealistic patient expectations. Improving PX is a priority, and there are many initiatives in place with perceived variable success and perceived barriers in improving PX.https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520948669
spellingShingle Rafina Khateeb MD, MBA, SFHM, FACP
Angela Keniston MSPH
Amber Moore MD, MPH
Christine Hrach MD, SFHM
Kimberly A Indovina MD
Patrick Kneeland MD
Mark Rudolph MD, SFHM
Marisha Burden MD
Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists
Journal of Patient Experience
title Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists
title_full Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists
title_fullStr Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists
title_short Perspectives on Patient Experience: A National Survey of Hospitalists
title_sort perspectives on patient experience a national survey of hospitalists
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373520948669
work_keys_str_mv AT rafinakhateebmdmbasfhmfacp perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists
AT angelakenistonmsph perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists
AT ambermooremdmph perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists
AT christinehrachmdsfhm perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists
AT kimberlyaindovinamd perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists
AT patrickkneelandmd perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists
AT markrudolphmdsfhm perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists
AT marishaburdenmd perspectivesonpatientexperienceanationalsurveyofhospitalists