The Psychometrics of the Mini-K

Many published studies have employed the Mini-K to measure a single fast–slow life history dimension. However, the internal structure of the Mini-K has not been determined and it is not clear that a single higher order K-factor fits the data. It is also not clear that the Mini-K is measurement invar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: George B. Richardson, Ching-Chen Chen, Chia-Liang Dai, Michael D. Brubaker, Joseph L. Nedelec
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-02-01
Series:Evolutionary Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916682034
_version_ 1797268910675853312
author George B. Richardson
Ching-Chen Chen
Chia-Liang Dai
Michael D. Brubaker
Joseph L. Nedelec
author_facet George B. Richardson
Ching-Chen Chen
Chia-Liang Dai
Michael D. Brubaker
Joseph L. Nedelec
author_sort George B. Richardson
collection DOAJ
description Many published studies have employed the Mini-K to measure a single fast–slow life history dimension. However, the internal structure of the Mini-K has not been determined and it is not clear that a single higher order K-factor fits the data. It is also not clear that the Mini-K is measurement invariant across groups such as the sexes. To establish the construct validity of K as well as the broader usefulness of applying life history theory to humans, it is crucial that these psychometric issues are addressed as a part of measure validation efforts. Here we report on three studies that used latent variable modeling and data drawn from two college student samples ( n s = 361 and 300) to elucidate the psychometrics of the Mini-K. We found that (a) the Mini-K had a six dimensional first-order structure, (b) the K-factor provided a parsimonious explanation of the associations among the lower order factors at no significant cost to fit, (c) the Mini-K measured the same K-factor across the sexes, (d) K-factor means did not have the same meaning across the sexes and thus the first-order factors should be used in studies of mean sex differences, and finally, (e) the K-factor was only associated with environment and aspects of mating competition in females. Implications and future directions for life history research are discussed.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T11:16:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6cc1a90cbb4444459f91b577d5772852
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1474-7049
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-25T01:39:59Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Evolutionary Psychology
spelling doaj.art-6cc1a90cbb4444459f91b577d57728522024-03-08T07:03:20ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492017-02-011510.1177/147470491668203410.1177_1474704916682034The Psychometrics of the Mini-KGeorge B. Richardson0Ching-Chen Chen1Chia-Liang Dai2Michael D. Brubaker3Joseph L. Nedelec4 School of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA University of Nevada–Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA University of Nevada–Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, USA School of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA School of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USAMany published studies have employed the Mini-K to measure a single fast–slow life history dimension. However, the internal structure of the Mini-K has not been determined and it is not clear that a single higher order K-factor fits the data. It is also not clear that the Mini-K is measurement invariant across groups such as the sexes. To establish the construct validity of K as well as the broader usefulness of applying life history theory to humans, it is crucial that these psychometric issues are addressed as a part of measure validation efforts. Here we report on three studies that used latent variable modeling and data drawn from two college student samples ( n s = 361 and 300) to elucidate the psychometrics of the Mini-K. We found that (a) the Mini-K had a six dimensional first-order structure, (b) the K-factor provided a parsimonious explanation of the associations among the lower order factors at no significant cost to fit, (c) the Mini-K measured the same K-factor across the sexes, (d) K-factor means did not have the same meaning across the sexes and thus the first-order factors should be used in studies of mean sex differences, and finally, (e) the K-factor was only associated with environment and aspects of mating competition in females. Implications and future directions for life history research are discussed.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916682034
spellingShingle George B. Richardson
Ching-Chen Chen
Chia-Liang Dai
Michael D. Brubaker
Joseph L. Nedelec
The Psychometrics of the Mini-K
Evolutionary Psychology
title The Psychometrics of the Mini-K
title_full The Psychometrics of the Mini-K
title_fullStr The Psychometrics of the Mini-K
title_full_unstemmed The Psychometrics of the Mini-K
title_short The Psychometrics of the Mini-K
title_sort psychometrics of the mini k
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916682034
work_keys_str_mv AT georgebrichardson thepsychometricsoftheminik
AT chingchenchen thepsychometricsoftheminik
AT chialiangdai thepsychometricsoftheminik
AT michaeldbrubaker thepsychometricsoftheminik
AT josephlnedelec thepsychometricsoftheminik
AT georgebrichardson psychometricsoftheminik
AT chingchenchen psychometricsoftheminik
AT chialiangdai psychometricsoftheminik
AT michaeldbrubaker psychometricsoftheminik
AT josephlnedelec psychometricsoftheminik