Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube
Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate the compliance of the scientific, quality, and educational content of YouTube videos with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the American Health Association 2020 current resuscitation guideline.Method:The first 70 most watched videos were recorded...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
2023-03-01
|
Series: | Bagcilar Medical Bulletin |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: |
http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-videos-with-covd-19-and-cpr-content-/58785
|
_version_ | 1797884340854587392 |
---|---|
author | Hatice Topcu |
author_facet | Hatice Topcu |
author_sort | Hatice Topcu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate the compliance of the scientific, quality, and educational content of YouTube videos with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the American Health Association 2020 current resuscitation guideline.Method:The first 70 most watched videos were recorded for evaluation by typing Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and CPR as keywords in the search engine of the YouTube homepage. The videos were evaluated according to the criteria of inclusion in the study, and the source of the videos, by whom they were uploaded, the length of the video, the number of days uploaded, the number of views and likes, the global quality score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score and the m-DISCERN scoring systems were recorded to detect the characteristics of the videos. These data were evaluated statistically.Results:21% of the evaluated videos were uploaded by doctors and 79% by healthcare providers. The average video length was 3.945 seconds, the average number of views was 9104.37, and the average number of like was 61.70. The mean GQS was 4.24, mean JAMA score was 3.06, and mean m-DISCERN score was 3.76. There was no statistically significant difference between both the loaders.Conclusion:YouTube videos were found to be accurate and appropriate for scientific content. The reliability of YouTube, which is a visual video content, is significantly meaningful, especially about how healthcare professionals will perform CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:05:55Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6cc59c9b261446b2880dd0a41d8ca9f6 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2547-9431 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:05:55Z |
publishDate | 2023-03-01 |
publisher | Galenos Yayinevi |
record_format | Article |
series | Bagcilar Medical Bulletin |
spelling | doaj.art-6cc59c9b261446b2880dd0a41d8ca9f62023-03-13T06:16:09ZengGalenos YayineviBagcilar Medical Bulletin2547-94312023-03-0181576110.4274/BMB.galenos.2023.2023-01-0813049054Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTubeHatice Topcu0 University of Health Sciences Turkey, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Emergency Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate the compliance of the scientific, quality, and educational content of YouTube videos with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the American Health Association 2020 current resuscitation guideline.Method:The first 70 most watched videos were recorded for evaluation by typing Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and CPR as keywords in the search engine of the YouTube homepage. The videos were evaluated according to the criteria of inclusion in the study, and the source of the videos, by whom they were uploaded, the length of the video, the number of days uploaded, the number of views and likes, the global quality score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score and the m-DISCERN scoring systems were recorded to detect the characteristics of the videos. These data were evaluated statistically.Results:21% of the evaluated videos were uploaded by doctors and 79% by healthcare providers. The average video length was 3.945 seconds, the average number of views was 9104.37, and the average number of like was 61.70. The mean GQS was 4.24, mean JAMA score was 3.06, and mean m-DISCERN score was 3.76. There was no statistically significant difference between both the loaders.Conclusion:YouTube videos were found to be accurate and appropriate for scientific content. The reliability of YouTube, which is a visual video content, is significantly meaningful, especially about how healthcare professionals will perform CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic. http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-videos-with-covd-19-and-cpr-content-/58785 covid-19cprgqsjamam-discernyoutube |
spellingShingle | Hatice Topcu Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube Bagcilar Medical Bulletin covid-19 cpr gqs jama m-discern youtube |
title | Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube |
title_full | Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube |
title_short | Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube |
title_sort | evaluation of videos with covid 19 and cpr content on youtube |
topic | covid-19 cpr gqs jama m-discern youtube |
url |
http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-videos-with-covd-19-and-cpr-content-/58785
|
work_keys_str_mv | AT haticetopcu evaluationofvideoswithcovid19andcprcontentonyoutube |