Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube

Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate the compliance of the scientific, quality, and educational content of YouTube videos with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the American Health Association 2020 current resuscitation guideline.Method:The first 70 most watched videos were recorded...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hatice Topcu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2023-03-01
Series:Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
Subjects:
Online Access: http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-videos-with-covd-19-and-cpr-content-/58785
_version_ 1797884340854587392
author Hatice Topcu
author_facet Hatice Topcu
author_sort Hatice Topcu
collection DOAJ
description Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate the compliance of the scientific, quality, and educational content of YouTube videos with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the American Health Association 2020 current resuscitation guideline.Method:The first 70 most watched videos were recorded for evaluation by typing Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and CPR as keywords in the search engine of the YouTube homepage. The videos were evaluated according to the criteria of inclusion in the study, and the source of the videos, by whom they were uploaded, the length of the video, the number of days uploaded, the number of views and likes, the global quality score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score and the m-DISCERN scoring systems were recorded to detect the characteristics of the videos. These data were evaluated statistically.Results:21% of the evaluated videos were uploaded by doctors and 79% by healthcare providers. The average video length was 3.945 seconds, the average number of views was 9104.37, and the average number of like was 61.70. The mean GQS was 4.24, mean JAMA score was 3.06, and mean m-DISCERN score was 3.76. There was no statistically significant difference between both the loaders.Conclusion:YouTube videos were found to be accurate and appropriate for scientific content. The reliability of YouTube, which is a visual video content, is significantly meaningful, especially about how healthcare professionals will perform CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:05:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6cc59c9b261446b2880dd0a41d8ca9f6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2547-9431
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:05:55Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
record_format Article
series Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
spelling doaj.art-6cc59c9b261446b2880dd0a41d8ca9f62023-03-13T06:16:09ZengGalenos YayineviBagcilar Medical Bulletin2547-94312023-03-0181576110.4274/BMB.galenos.2023.2023-01-0813049054Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTubeHatice Topcu0 University of Health Sciences Turkey, Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Emergency Medicine, İstanbul, Turkey Objective:The aim of this study is to evaluate the compliance of the scientific, quality, and educational content of YouTube videos with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with the American Health Association 2020 current resuscitation guideline.Method:The first 70 most watched videos were recorded for evaluation by typing Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and CPR as keywords in the search engine of the YouTube homepage. The videos were evaluated according to the criteria of inclusion in the study, and the source of the videos, by whom they were uploaded, the length of the video, the number of days uploaded, the number of views and likes, the global quality score (GQS), the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) score and the m-DISCERN scoring systems were recorded to detect the characteristics of the videos. These data were evaluated statistically.Results:21% of the evaluated videos were uploaded by doctors and 79% by healthcare providers. The average video length was 3.945 seconds, the average number of views was 9104.37, and the average number of like was 61.70. The mean GQS was 4.24, mean JAMA score was 3.06, and mean m-DISCERN score was 3.76. There was no statistically significant difference between both the loaders.Conclusion:YouTube videos were found to be accurate and appropriate for scientific content. The reliability of YouTube, which is a visual video content, is significantly meaningful, especially about how healthcare professionals will perform CPR during the COVID-19 pandemic. http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-videos-with-covd-19-and-cpr-content-/58785 covid-19cprgqsjamam-discernyoutube
spellingShingle Hatice Topcu
Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube
Bagcilar Medical Bulletin
covid-19
cpr
gqs
jama
m-discern
youtube
title Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube
title_full Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube
title_fullStr Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube
title_short Evaluation of Videos with COVID-19 and CPR Content on YouTube
title_sort evaluation of videos with covid 19 and cpr content on youtube
topic covid-19
cpr
gqs
jama
m-discern
youtube
url http://behmedicalbulletin.org/archives/archive-detail/article-preview/evaluation-of-videos-with-covd-19-and-cpr-content-/58785
work_keys_str_mv AT haticetopcu evaluationofvideoswithcovid19andcprcontentonyoutube