Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.

Extensive experimental psychology research has attempted to parse the complex relationship between psychosocial stress, mood, cognitive performance, and physiological changes. To do so, it is necessary to have effective, validated methods to experimentally induce psychosocial stress. The Trier Socia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Grace E Giles, Caroline R Mahoney, Tad T Brunyé, Holly A Taylor, Robin B Kanarek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4264740?pdf=render
_version_ 1819047012389093376
author Grace E Giles
Caroline R Mahoney
Tad T Brunyé
Holly A Taylor
Robin B Kanarek
author_facet Grace E Giles
Caroline R Mahoney
Tad T Brunyé
Holly A Taylor
Robin B Kanarek
author_sort Grace E Giles
collection DOAJ
description Extensive experimental psychology research has attempted to parse the complex relationship between psychosocial stress, mood, cognitive performance, and physiological changes. To do so, it is necessary to have effective, validated methods to experimentally induce psychosocial stress. The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is the most commonly used method of experimentally inducing psychosocial stress, but it is resource intensive. Less resource intense psychosocial stress tasks include the Socially Evaluative Cold Pressor Task (SECPT) and a computerized mental arithmetic task (MAT). These tasks effectively produce a physiological and psychological stress response and have the benefits of requiring fewer experimenters and affording data collection from multiple participants simultaneously. The objective of this study was to compare the magnitude and duration of these three experimental psychosocial stress induction paradigms. On each of four separate days, participants completed either a control non-stressful task or one of the three experimental stressors: the TSST, SECPT, or MAT. We measured mood, working memory performance, salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase (AA), and heart rate. The TSST and SECPT exerted the most robust effects on mood and physiological measures. TSST effects were generally evident immediately post-stress as well as 10- and 20-minutes after stress cessation, whereas SECPT effects were generally limited to the duration of the stressor. The stress duration is a key determinant when planning a study that utilizes an experimental stressor, as researchers may be interested in collecting dependent measures prior to stress cessation. In this way, the TSST would allow the investigator a longer window to administer tasks of interest.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T10:53:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6cd0e4abbf314d678717e1e22c6a462b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T10:53:36Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-6cd0e4abbf314d678717e1e22c6a462b2022-12-21T19:06:35ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01912e11361810.1371/journal.pone.0113618Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.Grace E GilesCaroline R MahoneyTad T BrunyéHolly A TaylorRobin B KanarekExtensive experimental psychology research has attempted to parse the complex relationship between psychosocial stress, mood, cognitive performance, and physiological changes. To do so, it is necessary to have effective, validated methods to experimentally induce psychosocial stress. The Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) is the most commonly used method of experimentally inducing psychosocial stress, but it is resource intensive. Less resource intense psychosocial stress tasks include the Socially Evaluative Cold Pressor Task (SECPT) and a computerized mental arithmetic task (MAT). These tasks effectively produce a physiological and psychological stress response and have the benefits of requiring fewer experimenters and affording data collection from multiple participants simultaneously. The objective of this study was to compare the magnitude and duration of these three experimental psychosocial stress induction paradigms. On each of four separate days, participants completed either a control non-stressful task or one of the three experimental stressors: the TSST, SECPT, or MAT. We measured mood, working memory performance, salivary cortisol and alpha-amylase (AA), and heart rate. The TSST and SECPT exerted the most robust effects on mood and physiological measures. TSST effects were generally evident immediately post-stress as well as 10- and 20-minutes after stress cessation, whereas SECPT effects were generally limited to the duration of the stressor. The stress duration is a key determinant when planning a study that utilizes an experimental stressor, as researchers may be interested in collecting dependent measures prior to stress cessation. In this way, the TSST would allow the investigator a longer window to administer tasks of interest.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4264740?pdf=render
spellingShingle Grace E Giles
Caroline R Mahoney
Tad T Brunyé
Holly A Taylor
Robin B Kanarek
Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.
PLoS ONE
title Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.
title_full Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.
title_fullStr Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.
title_full_unstemmed Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.
title_short Stress effects on mood, HPA axis, and autonomic response: comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms.
title_sort stress effects on mood hpa axis and autonomic response comparison of three psychosocial stress paradigms
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4264740?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT graceegiles stresseffectsonmoodhpaaxisandautonomicresponsecomparisonofthreepsychosocialstressparadigms
AT carolinermahoney stresseffectsonmoodhpaaxisandautonomicresponsecomparisonofthreepsychosocialstressparadigms
AT tadtbrunye stresseffectsonmoodhpaaxisandautonomicresponsecomparisonofthreepsychosocialstressparadigms
AT hollyataylor stresseffectsonmoodhpaaxisandautonomicresponsecomparisonofthreepsychosocialstressparadigms
AT robinbkanarek stresseffectsonmoodhpaaxisandautonomicresponsecomparisonofthreepsychosocialstressparadigms