Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series
Correction of Class II malocclusion by distalization of maxillary molars with intraoral appliances is a non-extraction treatment approach, which has been described as an alternative to Head Gear. From the past few years, the procedures have undergone rectification to achieve treatment objective mo...
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2017-05-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/9922/25656_CE[Ra1]_F(GH)_PF1(P_SY)_PFA(SY_SS).pdf |
| _version_ | 1819077799894319104 |
|---|---|
| author | Devinder Preet Singh Shefali Arora Sumit Kumar Yadav Neal Bharat Kedia |
| author_facet | Devinder Preet Singh Shefali Arora Sumit Kumar Yadav Neal Bharat Kedia |
| author_sort | Devinder Preet Singh |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Correction of Class II malocclusion by distalization of maxillary molars with intraoral appliances is a non-extraction treatment approach,
which has been described as an alternative to Head Gear. From the past few years, the procedures have undergone rectification to
achieve treatment objective more precisely. This has been made possible by a better understanding of bone physiology, tooth movement,
biomechanics and newer biomaterials. Nowadays newer distalizing appliances, like the Jones Jig, Lokar distalizer and Carrière distalizer,
have been developed which have compact designs and cause minimal discomfort to the patient. Refinement in these appliances is
concentrated mainly on achieving bodily movement of the molar rather than simple tipping. These appliances are also operator friendly
as these are easy to insert and remove. The present case series presents the efficacy of these appliances in Class II malocclusion
patients with a mean age of 16 years (age range of 15-17 years) that reported with the chief complaint of irregular upper front teeth,
since non-extraction approach in correcting Class II malocclusion is gaining a lot of attention. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T19:02:57Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6cdb086d14f743c79d5efa0bde53f163 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2249-782X 0973-709X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T19:02:57Z |
| publishDate | 2017-05-01 |
| publisher | JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-6cdb086d14f743c79d5efa0bde53f1632022-12-21T18:53:26ZengJCDR Research and Publications Private LimitedJournal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research2249-782X0973-709X2017-05-01115ZR01ZR0410.7860/JCDR/2017/25656.9922Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case SeriesDevinder Preet Singh0Shefali Arora1Sumit Kumar Yadav2Neal Bharat Kedia3Senior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Dr Harvansh Singh Judge Institute of Dental Sciences, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Swami Devi Dyal Dental College and Hospital, Barwala, Haryana, India.Reader, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Mithila Minority Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India.Reader, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Buddha Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Patna, Bihar, India.Correction of Class II malocclusion by distalization of maxillary molars with intraoral appliances is a non-extraction treatment approach, which has been described as an alternative to Head Gear. From the past few years, the procedures have undergone rectification to achieve treatment objective more precisely. This has been made possible by a better understanding of bone physiology, tooth movement, biomechanics and newer biomaterials. Nowadays newer distalizing appliances, like the Jones Jig, Lokar distalizer and Carrière distalizer, have been developed which have compact designs and cause minimal discomfort to the patient. Refinement in these appliances is concentrated mainly on achieving bodily movement of the molar rather than simple tipping. These appliances are also operator friendly as these are easy to insert and remove. The present case series presents the efficacy of these appliances in Class II malocclusion patients with a mean age of 16 years (age range of 15-17 years) that reported with the chief complaint of irregular upper front teeth, since non-extraction approach in correcting Class II malocclusion is gaining a lot of attention.https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/9922/25656_CE[Ra1]_F(GH)_PF1(P_SY)_PFA(SY_SS).pdfintraoral distalizersmalocclusionnon-extraction |
| spellingShingle | Devinder Preet Singh Shefali Arora Sumit Kumar Yadav Neal Bharat Kedia Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research intraoral distalizers malocclusion non-extraction |
| title | Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series |
| title_full | Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series |
| title_fullStr | Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series |
| title_full_unstemmed | Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series |
| title_short | Intraoral Approaches for Maxillary Molar Distalization: Case Series |
| title_sort | intraoral approaches for maxillary molar distalization case series |
| topic | intraoral distalizers malocclusion non-extraction |
| url | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/9922/25656_CE[Ra1]_F(GH)_PF1(P_SY)_PFA(SY_SS).pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT devinderpreetsingh intraoralapproachesformaxillarymolardistalizationcaseseries AT shefaliarora intraoralapproachesformaxillarymolardistalizationcaseseries AT sumitkumaryadav intraoralapproachesformaxillarymolardistalizationcaseseries AT nealbharatkedia intraoralapproachesformaxillarymolardistalizationcaseseries |