The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy

We propose a unitary analysis of the English Progressive Present. Difficult as it may be to account for some of its uses in aspectual terms alone, we argue that referring to an event in progress at a given moment is the main function of the BE + –ING form. Yet, this meaning does not emerge out of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Grégory Furmaniak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
Series:Corela
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/corela/528
_version_ 1797313852255240192
author Grégory Furmaniak
author_facet Grégory Furmaniak
author_sort Grégory Furmaniak
collection DOAJ
description We propose a unitary analysis of the English Progressive Present. Difficult as it may be to account for some of its uses in aspectual terms alone, we argue that referring to an event in progress at a given moment is the main function of the BE + –ING form. Yet, this meaning does not emerge out of the blue. It is a semantic construct resulting from a complex cognitive process. Our contention is that this underlying thought process (based on metonymy) can, in certain circumstances, take over the aspectual meaning without, however, deleting it completely.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T02:37:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6cf71e45c4124713a8ab2cba1bef87ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1638-573X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T02:37:36Z
publisher Cercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICO
record_format Article
series Corela
spelling doaj.art-6cf71e45c4124713a8ab2cba1bef87ab2024-02-13T13:53:04ZengCercle linguistique du Centre et de l'Ouest - CerLICOCorela1638-573X3210.4000/corela.528The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymyGrégory FurmaniakWe propose a unitary analysis of the English Progressive Present. Difficult as it may be to account for some of its uses in aspectual terms alone, we argue that referring to an event in progress at a given moment is the main function of the BE + –ING form. Yet, this meaning does not emerge out of the blue. It is a semantic construct resulting from a complex cognitive process. Our contention is that this underlying thought process (based on metonymy) can, in certain circumstances, take over the aspectual meaning without, however, deleting it completely.https://journals.openedition.org/corela/528BE + -INGaspectprogressifmétonymieré-interprétation.
spellingShingle Grégory Furmaniak
The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy
Corela
BE + -ING
aspect
progressif
métonymie
ré-interprétation.
title The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy
title_full The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy
title_fullStr The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy
title_full_unstemmed The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy
title_short The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy
title_sort be ing form progressive aspect and metonymy
topic BE + -ING
aspect
progressif
métonymie
ré-interprétation.
url https://journals.openedition.org/corela/528
work_keys_str_mv AT gregoryfurmaniak thebeingformprogressiveaspectandmetonymy
AT gregoryfurmaniak beingformprogressiveaspectandmetonymy