Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning

Imagery training has been shown to induce motor learning in adults, but similar evidence in children is scarce. In this experiment, we aimed to evaluate the effect of association between imagery and physical practice compared to pure physical practice in the learning of a manual task in 9-10 year-ol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrícia Sayuri Takazono, Luis Augusto Teixeira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina 2018-12-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51069
_version_ 1819067334660194304
author Patrícia Sayuri Takazono
Luis Augusto Teixeira
author_facet Patrícia Sayuri Takazono
Luis Augusto Teixeira
author_sort Patrícia Sayuri Takazono
collection DOAJ
description Imagery training has been shown to induce motor learning in adults, but similar evidence in children is scarce. In this experiment, we aimed to evaluate the effect of association between imagery and physical practice compared to pure physical practice in the learning of a manual task in 9-10 year-old children. The task consisted of transporting a block and fitting it into a support with speed and steadiness, assessing movement time to complete the “reaching” and “transport” task components. The children were assigned to one of three groups: (a) physical practice (PHYS) (240 trials), (b) combination (COMB) of imagery (180 trials) and physical (60 trials) practice, and (c) control (CON), associating visual rotation (180 trials) and physical practice (60 trials). Performance was evaluated immediately and 24 h after practice. Results indicated that the PHYS group achieved a persistent performance gain in the “transport”, but not in the “reaching” task component, while the COMB group achieved persistent performance gains in both movement components; no significant differences were found for the CON group. Our results suggest that imagery training improves the task mental representation in children, while physical practice provides sensory feedback on the performed movements. As a conclusion, the results suggest that combination of imagery and physical practice can be more effective than pure physical practice for children’s motor learning.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T16:16:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d080b273f804310bdb9ac27584a878d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1415-8426
1980-0037
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T16:16:36Z
publishDate 2018-12-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
spelling doaj.art-6d080b273f804310bdb9ac27584a878d2022-12-21T18:57:40ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa CatarinaRevista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano1415-84261980-00372018-12-0120536337210.5007/1980-0037.2018v20n5p36330205Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learningPatrícia Sayuri Takazono0Luis Augusto Teixeira1Universidade de São PauloUniversidade de São PauloImagery training has been shown to induce motor learning in adults, but similar evidence in children is scarce. In this experiment, we aimed to evaluate the effect of association between imagery and physical practice compared to pure physical practice in the learning of a manual task in 9-10 year-old children. The task consisted of transporting a block and fitting it into a support with speed and steadiness, assessing movement time to complete the “reaching” and “transport” task components. The children were assigned to one of three groups: (a) physical practice (PHYS) (240 trials), (b) combination (COMB) of imagery (180 trials) and physical (60 trials) practice, and (c) control (CON), associating visual rotation (180 trials) and physical practice (60 trials). Performance was evaluated immediately and 24 h after practice. Results indicated that the PHYS group achieved a persistent performance gain in the “transport”, but not in the “reaching” task component, while the COMB group achieved persistent performance gains in both movement components; no significant differences were found for the CON group. Our results suggest that imagery training improves the task mental representation in children, while physical practice provides sensory feedback on the performed movements. As a conclusion, the results suggest that combination of imagery and physical practice can be more effective than pure physical practice for children’s motor learning.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51069Atividade MotoraAprendizagemCriançaDestreza motora
spellingShingle Patrícia Sayuri Takazono
Luis Augusto Teixeira
Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano
Atividade Motora
Aprendizagem
Criança
Destreza motora
title Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning
title_full Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning
title_fullStr Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning
title_full_unstemmed Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning
title_short Effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children’s motor learning
title_sort effect of association of imagery and physical practice on children s motor learning
topic Atividade Motora
Aprendizagem
Criança
Destreza motora
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/rbcdh/article/view/51069
work_keys_str_mv AT patriciasayuritakazono effectofassociationofimageryandphysicalpracticeonchildrensmotorlearning
AT luisaugustoteixeira effectofassociationofimageryandphysicalpracticeonchildrensmotorlearning