Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative Study

BackgroundWith the move to virtual interviewing, residency websites are an important recruitment resource, introducing applicants to programs across the country and allowing for comparison. Recruitment is highly competitive from a common potential pool between vascular surger...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine Jensen, Qi Yan, Mark G Davies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JMIR Publications 2022-06-01
Series:JMIR Medical Education
Online Access:https://mededu.jmir.org/2022/2/e35074
_version_ 1797734927725232128
author Katherine Jensen
Qi Yan
Mark G Davies
author_facet Katherine Jensen
Qi Yan
Mark G Davies
author_sort Katherine Jensen
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundWith the move to virtual interviewing, residency websites are an important recruitment resource, introducing applicants to programs across the country and allowing for comparison. Recruitment is highly competitive from a common potential pool between vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and interventional radiology with the ratio of applicants to positions being highest in interventional radiology, followed by thoracic surgery and lastly vascular surgery, as reported by the National Resident Matching Program. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the accessibility and availability of online content for those integrated residency programs. MethodsA list of accredited vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and interventional radiology residencies was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database. Program websites were evaluated by trained independent reviewers (n=2) for content items pertaining to program recruitment and education (scored absent or present). Statistical analysis was performed in R software. ResultsOf ACGME-accredited programs, 56 of 61 (92%) vascular surgery, 27 of 27 (100%) thoracic surgery, and 74 of 85 (87%) interventional radiology programs had functional websites (P=.12). Vascular surgery websites contained a median of 26 (IQR 20-32) content items, thoracic surgery websites contained a median of 27 (IQR 21-32) content items, and interventional radiology websites contained a median of 23 (IQR 18-27) content items. Two content items considered highly influential to applicant program decisions are procedural experience and faculty mentorship, which were reported at 32% (18/56) and 11% (6/56) for vascular surgery, 19% (5/27) and 11% (3/27) for thoracic surgery, and 50% (37/74) and 15% (11/74) for interventional radiology (P=.008 and P=.75), respectively. Key deficits were work hours, debt management, and curriculum for interventional radiology; resident profiles, sample contracts, and research interests in vascular surgery; and operative experiences and the program director’s contact and message for thoracic surgery. Interventional radiology deficits were work hours, and thoracic surgery deficits were procedural experience. Both interventional radiology and thoracic surgery websites lacked information on evaluation criteria and faculty mentorship. ConclusionsThis study has uncovered key differences in the availability of online content for residencies recruiting from the same pool of applicants. Thoracic surgery has the most information, followed by vascular surgery, with interventional radiology reporting the least content. In the era of virtual interviewing from the same potential pool of applicants, programs should review and revise their web presence with the aim to increase the availability of online content to attract valuable candidates.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T12:51:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d1a2341b51d4efb97c54638dde94786
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2369-3762
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T12:51:46Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format Article
series JMIR Medical Education
spelling doaj.art-6d1a2341b51d4efb97c54638dde947862023-08-28T22:23:56ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Medical Education2369-37622022-06-0182e3507410.2196/35074Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative StudyKatherine Jensenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4158-157XQi Yanhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8565-1018Mark G Davieshttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7789-512X BackgroundWith the move to virtual interviewing, residency websites are an important recruitment resource, introducing applicants to programs across the country and allowing for comparison. Recruitment is highly competitive from a common potential pool between vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and interventional radiology with the ratio of applicants to positions being highest in interventional radiology, followed by thoracic surgery and lastly vascular surgery, as reported by the National Resident Matching Program. ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the accessibility and availability of online content for those integrated residency programs. MethodsA list of accredited vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, and interventional radiology residencies was obtained from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) database. Program websites were evaluated by trained independent reviewers (n=2) for content items pertaining to program recruitment and education (scored absent or present). Statistical analysis was performed in R software. ResultsOf ACGME-accredited programs, 56 of 61 (92%) vascular surgery, 27 of 27 (100%) thoracic surgery, and 74 of 85 (87%) interventional radiology programs had functional websites (P=.12). Vascular surgery websites contained a median of 26 (IQR 20-32) content items, thoracic surgery websites contained a median of 27 (IQR 21-32) content items, and interventional radiology websites contained a median of 23 (IQR 18-27) content items. Two content items considered highly influential to applicant program decisions are procedural experience and faculty mentorship, which were reported at 32% (18/56) and 11% (6/56) for vascular surgery, 19% (5/27) and 11% (3/27) for thoracic surgery, and 50% (37/74) and 15% (11/74) for interventional radiology (P=.008 and P=.75), respectively. Key deficits were work hours, debt management, and curriculum for interventional radiology; resident profiles, sample contracts, and research interests in vascular surgery; and operative experiences and the program director’s contact and message for thoracic surgery. Interventional radiology deficits were work hours, and thoracic surgery deficits were procedural experience. Both interventional radiology and thoracic surgery websites lacked information on evaluation criteria and faculty mentorship. ConclusionsThis study has uncovered key differences in the availability of online content for residencies recruiting from the same pool of applicants. Thoracic surgery has the most information, followed by vascular surgery, with interventional radiology reporting the least content. In the era of virtual interviewing from the same potential pool of applicants, programs should review and revise their web presence with the aim to increase the availability of online content to attract valuable candidates.https://mededu.jmir.org/2022/2/e35074
spellingShingle Katherine Jensen
Qi Yan
Mark G Davies
Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative Study
JMIR Medical Education
title Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative Study
title_full Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative Study
title_fullStr Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative Study
title_short Critical Comparison of the Quality and Content of Integrated Vascular Surgery, Thoracic Surgery, and Interventional Radiology Residency Training Program Websites: Qualitative Study
title_sort critical comparison of the quality and content of integrated vascular surgery thoracic surgery and interventional radiology residency training program websites qualitative study
url https://mededu.jmir.org/2022/2/e35074
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinejensen criticalcomparisonofthequalityandcontentofintegratedvascularsurgerythoracicsurgeryandinterventionalradiologyresidencytrainingprogramwebsitesqualitativestudy
AT qiyan criticalcomparisonofthequalityandcontentofintegratedvascularsurgerythoracicsurgeryandinterventionalradiologyresidencytrainingprogramwebsitesqualitativestudy
AT markgdavies criticalcomparisonofthequalityandcontentofintegratedvascularsurgerythoracicsurgeryandinterventionalradiologyresidencytrainingprogramwebsitesqualitativestudy