Discrepancies between judgment and choice of action in moral dilemmas
Everyone has experienced the potential discrepancy between what one judges as morally acceptable and what one actually does when a choice between alternative behaviors is to be made. The present study explores empirically whether judgment and choice of action differ when people make decisions on dil...
Main Authors: | Sébastien eTassy, Olivier eOullier, Julien eMancini, Bruno eWicker |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2013-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00250/full |
Similar Items
-
Induced guilt and more self-disciplined moral standards in moral dilemma judgment
by: Hao Yang, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01) -
High and low conflict moral dilemmas resolution: comparing moral judgment from Spanish and Mexican samples
by: G. Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Anticipatory stress interferes with utilitarian moral judgment
by: Katrin Starcke, et al.
Published: (2012-01-01) -
Moral Judgments of Human vs. AI Agents in Moral Dilemmas
by: Yuyan Zhang, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Moral pluralism on the trolley tracks: Different normative principles are used for different reasons in justifying moral judgments
by: Büsra Aktas, et al.
Published: (2017-05-01)