Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds

This study assessed the infection rates of different spore inoculum doses of the grapevine trunk pathogens Diplodia seriata, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Eutypa lata following artificial inoculation of pruning wounds. Potted vines of cv. Tempranillo were inoculated with doses ranging from 10 to 4...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Georgina ELENA, Mark SOSNOWSKI, Matthew AYRES, Pascal LECOMTE, Celine BENETREAU, Francesc GARCIA-FIGUERES, Jordi LUQUE
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Firenze University Press 2015-09-01
Series:Phytopathologia Mediterranea
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/5625
_version_ 1818691081471000576
author Georgina ELENA
Mark SOSNOWSKI
Matthew AYRES
Pascal LECOMTE
Celine BENETREAU
Francesc GARCIA-FIGUERES
Jordi LUQUE
author_facet Georgina ELENA
Mark SOSNOWSKI
Matthew AYRES
Pascal LECOMTE
Celine BENETREAU
Francesc GARCIA-FIGUERES
Jordi LUQUE
author_sort Georgina ELENA
collection DOAJ
description This study assessed the infection rates of different spore inoculum doses of the grapevine trunk pathogens Diplodia seriata, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Eutypa lata following artificial inoculation of pruning wounds. Potted vines of cv. Tempranillo were inoculated with doses ranging from 10 to 4000 conidia per wound of D. seriata and P. chlamydospora and led to recovery percentages of 10–100% for D. seriata and 16–94% for P. chlamydospora. Eutypa lata, when inoculated onto wounds of vines in a mature vineyard (cv. Shiraz) and on detached canes (cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) with a dose range of 10 to 1000 ascospores per wound, led to recovery percentages of 17–95%. In the field assay, there was no difference in recovery from wounds that were exposed to single or double inoculations with the same total spore dose, or between canes that were harvested 7 or 11 months after inoculation. The results obtained in this study showed significant variability in pathogen recovery between trials, comparable with that reported previously, which suggests that factors such as pathogen virulence, environmental parameters and experimental conditions may influence the infection process. According to this study, in order to obtain optimal recovery percentages of 50–70% for robust evaluation of pruning wound treatments, dose ranges of 100-1000 conidia of D. seriata, 100–2000 conidia of P. chlamydospora, and 100–500 ascospores of E. lata per wound would be required.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T12:36:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d28b66c85cc4eaa8a55a0dda2ce5db1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0031-9465
1593-2095
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T12:36:13Z
publishDate 2015-09-01
publisher Firenze University Press
record_format Article
series Phytopathologia Mediterranea
spelling doaj.art-6d28b66c85cc4eaa8a55a0dda2ce5db12022-12-21T21:48:16ZengFirenze University PressPhytopathologia Mediterranea0031-94651593-20952015-09-0154210.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-1601014122Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning woundsGeorgina ELENA0Mark SOSNOWSKIMatthew AYRESPascal LECOMTECeline BENETREAUFrancesc GARCIA-FIGUERESJordi LUQUEIRTAThis study assessed the infection rates of different spore inoculum doses of the grapevine trunk pathogens Diplodia seriata, Phaeomoniella chlamydospora and Eutypa lata following artificial inoculation of pruning wounds. Potted vines of cv. Tempranillo were inoculated with doses ranging from 10 to 4000 conidia per wound of D. seriata and P. chlamydospora and led to recovery percentages of 10–100% for D. seriata and 16–94% for P. chlamydospora. Eutypa lata, when inoculated onto wounds of vines in a mature vineyard (cv. Shiraz) and on detached canes (cv. Cabernet Sauvignon) with a dose range of 10 to 1000 ascospores per wound, led to recovery percentages of 17–95%. In the field assay, there was no difference in recovery from wounds that were exposed to single or double inoculations with the same total spore dose, or between canes that were harvested 7 or 11 months after inoculation. The results obtained in this study showed significant variability in pathogen recovery between trials, comparable with that reported previously, which suggests that factors such as pathogen virulence, environmental parameters and experimental conditions may influence the infection process. According to this study, in order to obtain optimal recovery percentages of 50–70% for robust evaluation of pruning wound treatments, dose ranges of 100-1000 conidia of D. seriata, 100–2000 conidia of P. chlamydospora, and 100–500 ascospores of E. lata per wound would be required.https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/5625Diplodia seriataPhaeomoniella chlamydosporaEutypa lataartificial inoculationsinoculum doses
spellingShingle Georgina ELENA
Mark SOSNOWSKI
Matthew AYRES
Pascal LECOMTE
Celine BENETREAU
Francesc GARCIA-FIGUERES
Jordi LUQUE
Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds
Phytopathologia Mediterranea
Diplodia seriata
Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
Eutypa lata
artificial inoculations
inoculum doses
title Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds
title_full Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds
title_fullStr Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds
title_short Effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds
title_sort effect of the inoculum dose of three grapevine trunk pathogens on the infection of artificially inoculated pruning wounds
topic Diplodia seriata
Phaeomoniella chlamydospora
Eutypa lata
artificial inoculations
inoculum doses
url https://oajournals.fupress.net/index.php/pm/article/view/5625
work_keys_str_mv AT georginaelena effectoftheinoculumdoseofthreegrapevinetrunkpathogensontheinfectionofartificiallyinoculatedpruningwounds
AT marksosnowski effectoftheinoculumdoseofthreegrapevinetrunkpathogensontheinfectionofartificiallyinoculatedpruningwounds
AT matthewayres effectoftheinoculumdoseofthreegrapevinetrunkpathogensontheinfectionofartificiallyinoculatedpruningwounds
AT pascallecomte effectoftheinoculumdoseofthreegrapevinetrunkpathogensontheinfectionofartificiallyinoculatedpruningwounds
AT celinebenetreau effectoftheinoculumdoseofthreegrapevinetrunkpathogensontheinfectionofartificiallyinoculatedpruningwounds
AT francescgarciafigueres effectoftheinoculumdoseofthreegrapevinetrunkpathogensontheinfectionofartificiallyinoculatedpruningwounds
AT jordiluque effectoftheinoculumdoseofthreegrapevinetrunkpathogensontheinfectionofartificiallyinoculatedpruningwounds