Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning

Some science educators claim that children enter science classrooms with a conception of heat considered by physicists to be incorrect and speculate that “misconceptions” may result from the way heat is talked about in everyday language (e.g., Lautrey and Mazens, 2004; Slotta and Chi, 2006). We inve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan R. Luce, Maureen A. Callanan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718/full
_version_ 1818503599491121152
author Megan R. Luce
Maureen A. Callanan
author_facet Megan R. Luce
Maureen A. Callanan
author_sort Megan R. Luce
collection DOAJ
description Some science educators claim that children enter science classrooms with a conception of heat considered by physicists to be incorrect and speculate that “misconceptions” may result from the way heat is talked about in everyday language (e.g., Lautrey and Mazens, 2004; Slotta and Chi, 2006). We investigated talk about heat in naturalistic conversation to explore the claim that children often hear heat discussed as a substance rather than as a process, potentially hindering later learning of heat as energy involved in emergent processes. We explored naturalistic speech among children and adults to understand the nature and the frequency of heat- and temperature-related conversations that young children are involved in. This study aims to investigate the actual linguistic resources that children have available as part of a sociocultural approach to cognitive development. Parents’ everyday conversations about heat and temperature with their 2–6-year-old children were drawn from the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES) language database and from a parent–child book-reading study. Parents used the word heat rarely, but they did so in ways that implied it is a substance. Parents never talked about heat as an emergent process but sometimes as a direct causal process. Most of the heat- and temperature-related talk, however, focused on words like hot and cold to describe temperature as a property of objects. This investigation of what young children actually experience in everyday conversations is a step toward studying how everyday language may play a role in children’s understanding of heat and temperature.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T21:26:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d28eda2bfee48b7af1bd9f0c683b557
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T21:26:06Z
publishDate 2020-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-6d28eda2bfee48b7af1bd9f0c683b5572022-12-22T01:32:59ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782020-08-011110.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718538775Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s LearningMegan R. LuceMaureen A. CallananSome science educators claim that children enter science classrooms with a conception of heat considered by physicists to be incorrect and speculate that “misconceptions” may result from the way heat is talked about in everyday language (e.g., Lautrey and Mazens, 2004; Slotta and Chi, 2006). We investigated talk about heat in naturalistic conversation to explore the claim that children often hear heat discussed as a substance rather than as a process, potentially hindering later learning of heat as energy involved in emergent processes. We explored naturalistic speech among children and adults to understand the nature and the frequency of heat- and temperature-related conversations that young children are involved in. This study aims to investigate the actual linguistic resources that children have available as part of a sociocultural approach to cognitive development. Parents’ everyday conversations about heat and temperature with their 2–6-year-old children were drawn from the Child Language Data Exchange System (CHILDES) language database and from a parent–child book-reading study. Parents used the word heat rarely, but they did so in ways that implied it is a substance. Parents never talked about heat as an emergent process but sometimes as a direct causal process. Most of the heat- and temperature-related talk, however, focused on words like hot and cold to describe temperature as a property of objects. This investigation of what young children actually experience in everyday conversations is a step toward studying how everyday language may play a role in children’s understanding of heat and temperature.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718/fullscience talkparent–child communicationconceptual changescientific thinkingsociocultural perspectives
spellingShingle Megan R. Luce
Maureen A. Callanan
Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
Frontiers in Psychology
science talk
parent–child communication
conceptual change
scientific thinking
sociocultural perspectives
title Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_full Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_fullStr Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_full_unstemmed Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_short Family Conversations About Heat and Temperature: Implications for Children’s Learning
title_sort family conversations about heat and temperature implications for children s learning
topic science talk
parent–child communication
conceptual change
scientific thinking
sociocultural perspectives
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01718/full
work_keys_str_mv AT meganrluce familyconversationsaboutheatandtemperatureimplicationsforchildrenslearning
AT maureenacallanan familyconversationsaboutheatandtemperatureimplicationsforchildrenslearning