Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in Jordan

Municipal solid waste services in Jordan are being provided by municipalities, where 90% of the generated solid waste finds its way to the landfills and dump sites. All Jordanian municipalities are suffering from low cost recovery where it reaches 50% in its best case. Realizing these facts, recentl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hani A. Abu-Qdais, Nawras Shatnawi, Rami Al-Shahrabi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Resources
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/3/32
_version_ 1827747795043352576
author Hani A. Abu-Qdais
Nawras Shatnawi
Rami Al-Shahrabi
author_facet Hani A. Abu-Qdais
Nawras Shatnawi
Rami Al-Shahrabi
author_sort Hani A. Abu-Qdais
collection DOAJ
description Municipal solid waste services in Jordan are being provided by municipalities, where 90% of the generated solid waste finds its way to the landfills and dump sites. All Jordanian municipalities are suffering from low cost recovery where it reaches 50% in its best case. Realizing these facts, recently, the Jordanian government has embarked on an ambitious package of regulations and policies to promote the adoption of circular economy options. The National Solid Waste Management Strategy (NSWMS) of Jordan has called for rationalization, gradual increase of the service fees and adoption of circular economy options through recycling and composting. To assess the impacts of the proposed policies by the NSWMS on the financial sustainability, a system dynamic modeling (SDM) was carried out for the two largest municipalities in the country, namely Greater Amman Municipality (GAM) and Greater Irbid Municipality (GIM). The share of solid waste management cost from the total municipal budget in GAM and GIM is 13.3% and 24%, respectively. On the other hand, the cost per ton of solid waste management in GAM is USD 85 and in GIM it is USD 50. Medium-term and long-term scenarios were considered in the SDM analysis. By considering the year 2016 as a baseline year, the simulation revealed that during the midterm period (2022–2026), the cost recovery will be increased from 54% to 82.5% in GAM, while in GIM it will be raised from 45% to 70%. Moreover, during the long-term period (2027–2034) as a result of adopting circular economy options by recycling and composting, both GAM and GIM will achieve full cost recovery of the solid waste services, in 2028 and 2029, respectively. Furthermore, diverting the solid waste from the landfill will lead to climate change mitigation, where about 652,275 tons of CO<sub>2eq</sub>. and greenhouse gases will be avoided. It is recommended that municipalities in Jordan should consider a more efficient solid waste collection mechanism rather than through electricity bills. Further research is needed to assess the impact of other circular economy options such as waste to energy and extended producer responsibility (EPR).
first_indexed 2024-03-11T05:57:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d2e9f59d5664988b90e0051591c9563
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2079-9276
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T05:57:17Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Resources
spelling doaj.art-6d2e9f59d5664988b90e0051591c95632023-11-17T13:41:22ZengMDPI AGResources2079-92762023-02-011233210.3390/resources12030032Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in JordanHani A. Abu-Qdais0Nawras Shatnawi1Rami Al-Shahrabi2Civil Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid 22110, JordanSurveying and Geomatics Engineering Department, Al-Balqa Applied University, P.O. Box 19117, Al-Salt 19117, JordanCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, German Jordanian University, P.O. Box 35247, Amman 11180, JordanMunicipal solid waste services in Jordan are being provided by municipalities, where 90% of the generated solid waste finds its way to the landfills and dump sites. All Jordanian municipalities are suffering from low cost recovery where it reaches 50% in its best case. Realizing these facts, recently, the Jordanian government has embarked on an ambitious package of regulations and policies to promote the adoption of circular economy options. The National Solid Waste Management Strategy (NSWMS) of Jordan has called for rationalization, gradual increase of the service fees and adoption of circular economy options through recycling and composting. To assess the impacts of the proposed policies by the NSWMS on the financial sustainability, a system dynamic modeling (SDM) was carried out for the two largest municipalities in the country, namely Greater Amman Municipality (GAM) and Greater Irbid Municipality (GIM). The share of solid waste management cost from the total municipal budget in GAM and GIM is 13.3% and 24%, respectively. On the other hand, the cost per ton of solid waste management in GAM is USD 85 and in GIM it is USD 50. Medium-term and long-term scenarios were considered in the SDM analysis. By considering the year 2016 as a baseline year, the simulation revealed that during the midterm period (2022–2026), the cost recovery will be increased from 54% to 82.5% in GAM, while in GIM it will be raised from 45% to 70%. Moreover, during the long-term period (2027–2034) as a result of adopting circular economy options by recycling and composting, both GAM and GIM will achieve full cost recovery of the solid waste services, in 2028 and 2029, respectively. Furthermore, diverting the solid waste from the landfill will lead to climate change mitigation, where about 652,275 tons of CO<sub>2eq</sub>. and greenhouse gases will be avoided. It is recommended that municipalities in Jordan should consider a more efficient solid waste collection mechanism rather than through electricity bills. Further research is needed to assess the impact of other circular economy options such as waste to energy and extended producer responsibility (EPR).https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/3/32fee systemfinancial sustainabilitycircular economysystem dynamic modelingcost recoveryJordan
spellingShingle Hani A. Abu-Qdais
Nawras Shatnawi
Rami Al-Shahrabi
Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in Jordan
Resources
fee system
financial sustainability
circular economy
system dynamic modeling
cost recovery
Jordan
title Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in Jordan
title_full Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in Jordan
title_fullStr Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in Jordan
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in Jordan
title_short Modeling the Impact of Fees and Circular Economy Options on the Financial Sustainability of the Solid Waste Management System in Jordan
title_sort modeling the impact of fees and circular economy options on the financial sustainability of the solid waste management system in jordan
topic fee system
financial sustainability
circular economy
system dynamic modeling
cost recovery
Jordan
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-9276/12/3/32
work_keys_str_mv AT haniaabuqdais modelingtheimpactoffeesandcirculareconomyoptionsonthefinancialsustainabilityofthesolidwastemanagementsysteminjordan
AT nawrasshatnawi modelingtheimpactoffeesandcirculareconomyoptionsonthefinancialsustainabilityofthesolidwastemanagementsysteminjordan
AT ramialshahrabi modelingtheimpactoffeesandcirculareconomyoptionsonthefinancialsustainabilityofthesolidwastemanagementsysteminjordan