Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese Adults

Background: Various studies have shown an inverse relationship between the quality of protein intake based on essential amino acids (EAAs) with obesity and its complications. We assumed that increasing EAAs-based protein intake quality improves glycemic and metabolic markers and anthropometric measu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ensiye Soleimani, Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-07-01
Series:Nutrition and Metabolic Insights
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/11786388231181038
_version_ 1797785583375876096
author Ensiye Soleimani
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
author_facet Ensiye Soleimani
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
author_sort Ensiye Soleimani
collection DOAJ
description Background: Various studies have shown an inverse relationship between the quality of protein intake based on essential amino acids (EAAs) with obesity and its complications. We assumed that increasing EAAs-based protein intake quality improves glycemic and metabolic markers and anthropometric measurements in obese and overweight people. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 180 obese and overweight participants aged 18 to 35. Dietary information was obtained using an 80-item food frequency questionnaire. The total intake of EAAs was calculated using the United States department of agriculture (USDA) database. Quality protein was defined as the ratio of EAAs (gr) to total dietary protein (gr). Sociodemographic status, physical activity (PA), and anthropometric characteristics were evaluated using a valid and reliable method. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tests adjusted for sex, PA, age, energy, and body mass index (BMI) were used to measure this association. Results: Protein quality intake was highest among the group with the lowest weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and fat mass (FM); and on the other hand, the fat-free mass (FFM) has increased; also Increasing the quality of protein intake improved the lipid profile and some glycemic indices and insulin sensitivity, although this association was not significant. Conclusions: Increasing the quality of protein intake significantly improved anthropometric measurements, and also improved some glycemic and metabolic indices although, their relationship was not significant.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T00:57:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d388af1d5e2465aad0d3a2eef324164
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-6388
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T00:57:06Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series Nutrition and Metabolic Insights
spelling doaj.art-6d388af1d5e2465aad0d3a2eef3241642023-07-06T18:33:26ZengSAGE PublishingNutrition and Metabolic Insights1178-63882023-07-011610.1177/11786388231181038Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese AdultsEnsiye SoleimaniMahdieh Abbasalizad FarhangiBackground: Various studies have shown an inverse relationship between the quality of protein intake based on essential amino acids (EAAs) with obesity and its complications. We assumed that increasing EAAs-based protein intake quality improves glycemic and metabolic markers and anthropometric measurements in obese and overweight people. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 180 obese and overweight participants aged 18 to 35. Dietary information was obtained using an 80-item food frequency questionnaire. The total intake of EAAs was calculated using the United States department of agriculture (USDA) database. Quality protein was defined as the ratio of EAAs (gr) to total dietary protein (gr). Sociodemographic status, physical activity (PA), and anthropometric characteristics were evaluated using a valid and reliable method. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) tests adjusted for sex, PA, age, energy, and body mass index (BMI) were used to measure this association. Results: Protein quality intake was highest among the group with the lowest weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and fat mass (FM); and on the other hand, the fat-free mass (FFM) has increased; also Increasing the quality of protein intake improved the lipid profile and some glycemic indices and insulin sensitivity, although this association was not significant. Conclusions: Increasing the quality of protein intake significantly improved anthropometric measurements, and also improved some glycemic and metabolic indices although, their relationship was not significant.https://doi.org/10.1177/11786388231181038
spellingShingle Ensiye Soleimani
Mahdieh Abbasalizad Farhangi
Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese Adults
Nutrition and Metabolic Insights
title Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese Adults
title_full Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese Adults
title_fullStr Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese Adults
title_full_unstemmed Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese Adults
title_short Protein Quality, Glycemic and Metabolic Indices and Anthropometric Features Among Overweight and Obese Adults
title_sort protein quality glycemic and metabolic indices and anthropometric features among overweight and obese adults
url https://doi.org/10.1177/11786388231181038
work_keys_str_mv AT ensiyesoleimani proteinqualityglycemicandmetabolicindicesandanthropometricfeaturesamongoverweightandobeseadults
AT mahdiehabbasalizadfarhangi proteinqualityglycemicandmetabolicindicesandanthropometricfeaturesamongoverweightandobeseadults