Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Waleed Fateen,1,2 Farooq Khan,1 Richard J O’Neill,3 Martin W James,1 Stephen D Ryder,1 Guruprasad P Aithal1,2 1NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, 2Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fateen W, Khan F, O’Neill RJ, James MW, Ryder SD, Aithal GP
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-10-01
Series:Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/healthcare-costs-of-transarterial-chemoembolization-in-the-treatment-o-peer-reviewed-article-JHC
_version_ 1817992541283287040
author Fateen W
Khan F
O’Neill RJ
James MW
Ryder SD
Aithal GP
author_facet Fateen W
Khan F
O’Neill RJ
James MW
Ryder SD
Aithal GP
author_sort Fateen W
collection DOAJ
description Waleed Fateen,1,2 Farooq Khan,1 Richard J O’Neill,3 Martin W James,1 Stephen D Ryder,1 Guruprasad P Aithal1,2 1NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, 2Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, 3Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK Background: A meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has recently been published. On balance, no significant differences were found in terms of objective response and overall survival. The impact on healthcare costs had been studied in small series based on a hypothetical model and was in favor of DEB-TACE. We aimed to evaluate and compare healthcare costs and effectiveness of both modalities in a cohort of patients from Nottingham, UK.Methods: Using a dedicated radiology database, we identified all patients who had undergone cTACE or DEB-TACE between 2006 and 2012 at a single tertiary referral center based in Nottingham. We collected clinical data, including treatment response, postprocedure complications and 30-day mortality. Costing models were constructed to present both our local hospital perspective as well as the national health service position.Results: During our study period, 101 procedures were performed on 43 patients (76 cTACE procedures on 26 patients and 25 DEB-TACE procedures on 17 patients). Overall, 11/26 in cTACE and 5/17 in DEB-TACE group had progressive disease (p=0.52). Adverse events were seen in 6/76 cTACE compared with 7/25 DEB-TACE group (p=0.16). Based on the predetermined standard pathway there was an unadjusted average cost difference of £3770.30 (TACE =£9070.44, DEB-TACE =£5300.14) in favor of the DEB-TACE. Results from our costing models indicated a £2715.33 (95% CI £580.88–4849.77) cost difference in favor of the same procedure.Conclusions: Even when the extra costs of DEB-TACE were considered, the overall treatment costs per patient were lower in relation to cTACE. Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial chemoembolization, healthcare costs, drug-eluting beads, objective response
first_indexed 2024-04-14T01:27:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d5a0d8232ef43ac86dd00a208058146
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2253-5969
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T01:27:14Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
spelling doaj.art-6d5a0d8232ef43ac86dd00a2080581462022-12-22T02:20:21ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma2253-59692017-10-01Volume 412313035185Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinomaFateen WKhan FO’Neill RJJames MWRyder SDAithal GPWaleed Fateen,1,2 Farooq Khan,1 Richard J O’Neill,3 Martin W James,1 Stephen D Ryder,1 Guruprasad P Aithal1,2 1NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Nottingham, 2Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, University of Nottingham, 3Department of Radiology, Nottingham University Hospitals, NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK Background: A meta-analysis comparing drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) has recently been published. On balance, no significant differences were found in terms of objective response and overall survival. The impact on healthcare costs had been studied in small series based on a hypothetical model and was in favor of DEB-TACE. We aimed to evaluate and compare healthcare costs and effectiveness of both modalities in a cohort of patients from Nottingham, UK.Methods: Using a dedicated radiology database, we identified all patients who had undergone cTACE or DEB-TACE between 2006 and 2012 at a single tertiary referral center based in Nottingham. We collected clinical data, including treatment response, postprocedure complications and 30-day mortality. Costing models were constructed to present both our local hospital perspective as well as the national health service position.Results: During our study period, 101 procedures were performed on 43 patients (76 cTACE procedures on 26 patients and 25 DEB-TACE procedures on 17 patients). Overall, 11/26 in cTACE and 5/17 in DEB-TACE group had progressive disease (p=0.52). Adverse events were seen in 6/76 cTACE compared with 7/25 DEB-TACE group (p=0.16). Based on the predetermined standard pathway there was an unadjusted average cost difference of £3770.30 (TACE =£9070.44, DEB-TACE =£5300.14) in favor of the DEB-TACE. Results from our costing models indicated a £2715.33 (95% CI £580.88–4849.77) cost difference in favor of the same procedure.Conclusions: Even when the extra costs of DEB-TACE were considered, the overall treatment costs per patient were lower in relation to cTACE. Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, transarterial chemoembolization, healthcare costs, drug-eluting beads, objective responsehttps://www.dovepress.com/healthcare-costs-of-transarterial-chemoembolization-in-the-treatment-o-peer-reviewed-article-JHCHepatocelllar carcinomatransarterial chemoembolizationHealthcare costsdrug eluting beadsobjective response
spellingShingle Fateen W
Khan F
O’Neill RJ
James MW
Ryder SD
Aithal GP
Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Hepatocelllar carcinoma
transarterial chemoembolization
Healthcare costs
drug eluting beads
objective response
title Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short Healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort healthcare costs of transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Hepatocelllar carcinoma
transarterial chemoembolization
Healthcare costs
drug eluting beads
objective response
url https://www.dovepress.com/healthcare-costs-of-transarterial-chemoembolization-in-the-treatment-o-peer-reviewed-article-JHC
work_keys_str_mv AT fateenw healthcarecostsoftransarterialchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT khanf healthcarecostsoftransarterialchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT oneillrj healthcarecostsoftransarterialchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT jamesmw healthcarecostsoftransarterialchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT rydersd healthcarecostsoftransarterialchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT aithalgp healthcarecostsoftransarterialchemoembolizationinthetreatmentofhepatocellularcarcinoma