Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarum

The two haloarchaeal proteins, GvpM and GvpJ, are homologous to GvpA, the major gas vesicle structural protein. All three are hydrophobic and essential for gas vesicle formation. The effect of mutations in GvpJ and GvpM was studied in Haloferax volcanii transformants by complementing the respective...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alisa Jost, Regine Knitsch, Kerstin Völkner, Felicitas Pfeifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Microbiology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.794240/full
_version_ 1818361705043853312
author Alisa Jost
Regine Knitsch
Kerstin Völkner
Felicitas Pfeifer
author_facet Alisa Jost
Regine Knitsch
Kerstin Völkner
Felicitas Pfeifer
author_sort Alisa Jost
collection DOAJ
description The two haloarchaeal proteins, GvpM and GvpJ, are homologous to GvpA, the major gas vesicle structural protein. All three are hydrophobic and essential for gas vesicle formation. The effect of mutations in GvpJ and GvpM was studied in Haloferax volcanii transformants by complementing the respective mutated gene with the remaining gvp genes and inspecting the cells for the presence of gas vesicles (Vac+). In case of GvpJ, 56 of 66 substitutions analyzed yielded Vac– ΔJ + Jmut transformants, indicating that GvpJ is very sensitive to alterations, whereas ten of the 38 GvpM variants resulted in Vac– ΔM + Mmut transformants. The variants were also tested by split-GFP for their ability to interact with their partner protein GvpL. Some of the alterations leading to a Vac– phenotype affected the J/L or M/L interaction. Also, the interactions J/A and J/M were studied using fragments to exclude an unspecific aggregation of these hydrophobic proteins. Both fragments of GvpJ interacted with the M1–25 and M60–84 fragments of GvpM, and fragment J1–56 of GvpJ interacted with the N-terminal fragment A1–22 of GvpA. A comparison of the results on the three homologous proteins indicates that despite their relatedness, GvpA, GvpJ, and GvpM have unique features and cannot substitute each other.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T21:20:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d5bd7504e76443ab7e614e247ae9ce3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-302X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T21:20:56Z
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Microbiology
spelling doaj.art-6d5bd7504e76443ab7e614e247ae9ce32022-12-21T23:31:06ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Microbiology1664-302X2021-12-011210.3389/fmicb.2021.794240794240Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarumAlisa JostRegine KnitschKerstin VölknerFelicitas PfeiferThe two haloarchaeal proteins, GvpM and GvpJ, are homologous to GvpA, the major gas vesicle structural protein. All three are hydrophobic and essential for gas vesicle formation. The effect of mutations in GvpJ and GvpM was studied in Haloferax volcanii transformants by complementing the respective mutated gene with the remaining gvp genes and inspecting the cells for the presence of gas vesicles (Vac+). In case of GvpJ, 56 of 66 substitutions analyzed yielded Vac– ΔJ + Jmut transformants, indicating that GvpJ is very sensitive to alterations, whereas ten of the 38 GvpM variants resulted in Vac– ΔM + Mmut transformants. The variants were also tested by split-GFP for their ability to interact with their partner protein GvpL. Some of the alterations leading to a Vac– phenotype affected the J/L or M/L interaction. Also, the interactions J/A and J/M were studied using fragments to exclude an unspecific aggregation of these hydrophobic proteins. Both fragments of GvpJ interacted with the M1–25 and M60–84 fragments of GvpM, and fragment J1–56 of GvpJ interacted with the N-terminal fragment A1–22 of GvpA. A comparison of the results on the three homologous proteins indicates that despite their relatedness, GvpA, GvpJ, and GvpM have unique features and cannot substitute each other.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.794240/fullprotein–protein interactionsplit-GFPHaloferax volcaniisubstitution variantsaccessory Gvp proteins
spellingShingle Alisa Jost
Regine Knitsch
Kerstin Völkner
Felicitas Pfeifer
Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarum
Frontiers in Microbiology
protein–protein interaction
split-GFP
Haloferax volcanii
substitution variants
accessory Gvp proteins
title Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarum
title_full Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarum
title_fullStr Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarum
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarum
title_short Effect of Mutations in GvpJ and GvpM on Gas Vesicle Formation of Halobacterium salinarum
title_sort effect of mutations in gvpj and gvpm on gas vesicle formation of halobacterium salinarum
topic protein–protein interaction
split-GFP
Haloferax volcanii
substitution variants
accessory Gvp proteins
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2021.794240/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alisajost effectofmutationsingvpjandgvpmongasvesicleformationofhalobacteriumsalinarum
AT regineknitsch effectofmutationsingvpjandgvpmongasvesicleformationofhalobacteriumsalinarum
AT kerstinvolkner effectofmutationsingvpjandgvpmongasvesicleformationofhalobacteriumsalinarum
AT felicitaspfeifer effectofmutationsingvpjandgvpmongasvesicleformationofhalobacteriumsalinarum