Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study
Statement of the Problem: The success of dental restorations depends mainly on its ability to bond to dental structures and resist the multitude of forces acting on it within the oral cavity. Purpose: Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dentjods.sums.ac.ir/article_47918_5aa7b5340e5f997bdda9ee6c3421e55f.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819349588201439232 |
|---|---|
| author | Komal Nanavati Farhin Katge Vamsi Krishna Chimata Debapriya Pradhan Aishwarya Kamble Devendra Patil |
| author_facet | Komal Nanavati Farhin Katge Vamsi Krishna Chimata Debapriya Pradhan Aishwarya Kamble Devendra Patil |
| author_sort | Komal Nanavati |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Statement of the Problem: The success of dental restorations depends mainly on its ability to bond to dental structures and resist the multitude of forces acting on it within the oral cavity.
Purpose: Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different glass ionomer based restorative materials.
Materials and Method: In this in vitro analytical study, 30 intact primary molars were sectioned buccolingually to obtain 60 sections. These sections were embedded in auto polymerizing acrylic resin and polished to obtain a flat dentin surface. Restoration cylinders were built on the dentin surface with the help of a Teflon template called bonding jig. Each group (n= 20) was restored as group A with conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (GC Fuji Gold Label Type 9), group B with Bioactive restorative material (ACTIVATM KIDS BioACTIVE Restorative material), and group C with Zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement (Zirconomer). Following restoration, SBS testing was performed using Universal Testing Machine. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using One way ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test (p= 0.05).
Results: The SBS values were significantly greater in the ACTIVA KIDS group as compared to the other two groups (p< 0.05). There was no significant difference in the SBS values between group B and group C (p> 0.05).
Conclusion: The SBS of the ACTIVA KIDS to primary teeth dentin was the highest as compared to Zirconomer and conventional GIC. Therefore ACTIVA KIDS may protect primary teeth against recurrent caries and failure of the restoration. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-24T19:02:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-6d63a3b93092423b9c22fc247425cc22 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2345-6485 2345-6418 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-24T19:02:54Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | Shiraz University of Medical Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-6d63a3b93092423b9c22fc247425cc222022-12-21T16:43:09ZengShiraz University of Medical SciencesJournal of Dentistry2345-64852345-64182021-12-0122426026610.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87115.1230Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro StudyKomal Nanavati 0Farhin Katge 1Vamsi Krishna Chimata 2Debapriya Pradhan 3Aishwarya Kamble4Devendra Patil 5Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Indian.Head of Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Indian. Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Indian.Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Indian.Postgraduate Student, Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Indian.Dept. of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Terna Dental College, Navi Mumbai, Indian.Statement of the Problem: The success of dental restorations depends mainly on its ability to bond to dental structures and resist the multitude of forces acting on it within the oral cavity. Purpose: Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength (SBS) of three different glass ionomer based restorative materials. Materials and Method: In this in vitro analytical study, 30 intact primary molars were sectioned buccolingually to obtain 60 sections. These sections were embedded in auto polymerizing acrylic resin and polished to obtain a flat dentin surface. Restoration cylinders were built on the dentin surface with the help of a Teflon template called bonding jig. Each group (n= 20) was restored as group A with conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (GC Fuji Gold Label Type 9), group B with Bioactive restorative material (ACTIVATM KIDS BioACTIVE Restorative material), and group C with Zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement (Zirconomer). Following restoration, SBS testing was performed using Universal Testing Machine. The data obtained were statistically analyzed using One way ANOVA test and post hoc Tukey test (p= 0.05). Results: The SBS values were significantly greater in the ACTIVA KIDS group as compared to the other two groups (p< 0.05). There was no significant difference in the SBS values between group B and group C (p> 0.05). Conclusion: The SBS of the ACTIVA KIDS to primary teeth dentin was the highest as compared to Zirconomer and conventional GIC. Therefore ACTIVA KIDS may protect primary teeth against recurrent caries and failure of the restoration.https://dentjods.sums.ac.ir/article_47918_5aa7b5340e5f997bdda9ee6c3421e55f.pdfglass ionomer cements; composite resins; zirconium; dentin; shear strength; primary teeth; |
| spellingShingle | Komal Nanavati Farhin Katge Vamsi Krishna Chimata Debapriya Pradhan Aishwarya Kamble Devendra Patil Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study Journal of Dentistry glass ionomer cements; composite resins; zirconium; dentin; shear strength; primary teeth; |
| title | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study |
| title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study |
| title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study |
| title_sort | comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of bioactive restorative material zirconia reinforced glass ionomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement to the dentinal surface of primary molars an in vitro study |
| topic | glass ionomer cements; composite resins; zirconium; dentin; shear strength; primary teeth; |
| url | https://dentjods.sums.ac.ir/article_47918_5aa7b5340e5f997bdda9ee6c3421e55f.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT komalnanavati comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerialzirconiareinforcedglassionomercementandconventionalglassionomercementtothedentinalsurfaceofprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy AT farhinkatge comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerialzirconiareinforcedglassionomercementandconventionalglassionomercementtothedentinalsurfaceofprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy AT vamsikrishnachimata comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerialzirconiareinforcedglassionomercementandconventionalglassionomercementtothedentinalsurfaceofprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy AT debapriyapradhan comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerialzirconiareinforcedglassionomercementandconventionalglassionomercementtothedentinalsurfaceofprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy AT aishwaryakamble comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerialzirconiareinforcedglassionomercementandconventionalglassionomercementtothedentinalsurfaceofprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy AT devendrapatil comparativeevaluationofshearbondstrengthofbioactiverestorativematerialzirconiareinforcedglassionomercementandconventionalglassionomercementtothedentinalsurfaceofprimarymolarsaninvitrostudy |