Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds

Ian Hacking uses the looping effect to describe how classificatory practices in the human sciences interact with the classified people. While arguably this interaction renders the affected human kinds unstable and hence different from natural kinds, realists argue that also some prototypical natura...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tuomas Vesterinen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Vienna 2022-03-01
Series:Journal of Social Ontology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6735
_version_ 1797818285038764032
author Tuomas Vesterinen
author_facet Tuomas Vesterinen
author_sort Tuomas Vesterinen
collection DOAJ
description Ian Hacking uses the looping effect to describe how classificatory practices in the human sciences interact with the classified people. While arguably this interaction renders the affected human kinds unstable and hence different from natural kinds, realists argue that also some prototypical natural kinds are interactive and human kinds in general are stable enough to support explanations and predictions. I defend a more fine-grained realist interpretation of interactive human kinds by arguing for an explanatory domain account of the looping effect. First, I argue that knowledge of the feedback mechanisms that mediate the looping effect can supplement, and help to identify, the applicability domain over which a kind and its property variations are stably explainable. Second, by applying this account to cross-cultural case studies of psychiatric disorders, I distinguish between congruent feedback mechanisms that explain matches between classifications and kinds, and incongruent feedback mechanisms that explain mismatches. For example, congruent mechanisms maintain Western auditory experiences in schizophrenia, whereas exporting diagnostic labels inflicts incongruence by influencing local experiences. Knowledge of the mechanisms can strengthen explanatory domains, and thereby facilitate classificatory adjustments and possible interventions on psychiatric disorders.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:05:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d6a805e6020425d96ad318f01937948
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2196-9663
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:05:50Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher University of Vienna
record_format Article
series Journal of Social Ontology
spelling doaj.art-6d6a805e6020425d96ad318f019379482023-05-28T07:32:13ZengUniversity of ViennaJournal of Social Ontology2196-96632022-03-0162Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive KindsTuomas Vesterinen0University of Helsinki Ian Hacking uses the looping effect to describe how classificatory practices in the human sciences interact with the classified people. While arguably this interaction renders the affected human kinds unstable and hence different from natural kinds, realists argue that also some prototypical natural kinds are interactive and human kinds in general are stable enough to support explanations and predictions. I defend a more fine-grained realist interpretation of interactive human kinds by arguing for an explanatory domain account of the looping effect. First, I argue that knowledge of the feedback mechanisms that mediate the looping effect can supplement, and help to identify, the applicability domain over which a kind and its property variations are stably explainable. Second, by applying this account to cross-cultural case studies of psychiatric disorders, I distinguish between congruent feedback mechanisms that explain matches between classifications and kinds, and incongruent feedback mechanisms that explain mismatches. For example, congruent mechanisms maintain Western auditory experiences in schizophrenia, whereas exporting diagnostic labels inflicts incongruence by influencing local experiences. Knowledge of the mechanisms can strengthen explanatory domains, and thereby facilitate classificatory adjustments and possible interventions on psychiatric disorders. https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6735looping effectnatural kindshuman kindsrealismpsychiatric disorderssocial mechanisms
spellingShingle Tuomas Vesterinen
Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds
Journal of Social Ontology
looping effect
natural kinds
human kinds
realism
psychiatric disorders
social mechanisms
title Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds
title_full Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds
title_fullStr Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds
title_full_unstemmed Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds
title_short Identifying the Explanatory Domain of the Looping Effect: Congruent and Incongruent Feedback Mechanisms of Interactive Kinds
title_sort identifying the explanatory domain of the looping effect congruent and incongruent feedback mechanisms of interactive kinds
topic looping effect
natural kinds
human kinds
realism
psychiatric disorders
social mechanisms
url https://journalofsocialontology.org/index.php/jso/article/view/6735
work_keys_str_mv AT tuomasvesterinen identifyingtheexplanatorydomainoftheloopingeffectcongruentandincongruentfeedbackmechanismsofinteractivekinds