Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South Korea

Introduction Globally, pneumococcal disease represents a significant burden. South Korea implemented the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in 2003, replaced with the 10-valent (PCV10) and 13-valent (PCV13) vaccine in 2010. In 2014, both vaccines were introduced in the national immunizat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hye-Young Kim, Seong-Beom Park, Eun-Sil Kang, Sang-Min Lee, Hyun-Jin Kim, Matt Wasserman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-03-01
Series:Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1796426
_version_ 1827809531352055808
author Hye-Young Kim
Seong-Beom Park
Eun-Sil Kang
Sang-Min Lee
Hyun-Jin Kim
Matt Wasserman
author_facet Hye-Young Kim
Seong-Beom Park
Eun-Sil Kang
Sang-Min Lee
Hyun-Jin Kim
Matt Wasserman
author_sort Hye-Young Kim
collection DOAJ
description Introduction Globally, pneumococcal disease represents a significant burden. South Korea implemented the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in 2003, replaced with the 10-valent (PCV10) and 13-valent (PCV13) vaccine in 2010. In 2014, both vaccines were introduced in the national immunization program (NIP) for infants with 3 primary doses and one booster dose We performed a cost-effectiveness evaluation to elucidate which vaccine may be expected to provide greater impact if included in a NIP. Methodology Using an established model, we estimated the impact of introducing either PCV13 or PCV10 into the South Korean NIP in 2015. Vaccine impact was based on historic observed impact of PCV13 from 2010 to 2015 in Korea given high uptake of PCV13, and PCV10 impact was estimated based on experiences in countries using PCV10. Incidence and costs for all ages and including invasive pneumococcal disease, pneumonia, and acute otitis media were derived from the literature and Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Results In the base-case, over 5-years PCV13 was estimated to avert 550,000 more cases of pneumococcal disease compared to PCV10, driven by broader serotype coverage and less replacement due to serotypes 3 and 19A. This translated to a cost-savings of $47.4 million USD despite PCV13’s higher cost. Sensitivity analysis found incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from cost-saving to $7,300 USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Conclusion A NIP using PCV13 was estimated to have a more substantial public health impact and be cost-saving compared to a program with PCV10 due to broader serotype coverage.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T22:42:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d77b562c1854b24b7a177a938f02175
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2164-5515
2164-554X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T22:42:35Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
spelling doaj.art-6d77b562c1854b24b7a177a938f021752023-09-22T08:51:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupHuman Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics2164-55152164-554X2021-03-0117390991810.1080/21645515.2020.17964261796426Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South KoreaHye-Young Kim0Seong-Beom Park1Eun-Sil Kang2Sang-Min Lee3Hyun-Jin Kim4Matt Wasserman5Pfizer LtdPfizer LtdPfizer LtdPfizer LtdPfizer LtdPfizer IncIntroduction Globally, pneumococcal disease represents a significant burden. South Korea implemented the 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7) in 2003, replaced with the 10-valent (PCV10) and 13-valent (PCV13) vaccine in 2010. In 2014, both vaccines were introduced in the national immunization program (NIP) for infants with 3 primary doses and one booster dose We performed a cost-effectiveness evaluation to elucidate which vaccine may be expected to provide greater impact if included in a NIP. Methodology Using an established model, we estimated the impact of introducing either PCV13 or PCV10 into the South Korean NIP in 2015. Vaccine impact was based on historic observed impact of PCV13 from 2010 to 2015 in Korea given high uptake of PCV13, and PCV10 impact was estimated based on experiences in countries using PCV10. Incidence and costs for all ages and including invasive pneumococcal disease, pneumonia, and acute otitis media were derived from the literature and Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Results In the base-case, over 5-years PCV13 was estimated to avert 550,000 more cases of pneumococcal disease compared to PCV10, driven by broader serotype coverage and less replacement due to serotypes 3 and 19A. This translated to a cost-savings of $47.4 million USD despite PCV13’s higher cost. Sensitivity analysis found incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) ranged from cost-saving to $7,300 USD per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Conclusion A NIP using PCV13 was estimated to have a more substantial public health impact and be cost-saving compared to a program with PCV10 due to broader serotype coverage.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1796426pneumococcal conjugate vaccinecost-effectivenesspneumococcal diseaseotitis mediapneumoniavaccines
spellingShingle Hye-Young Kim
Seong-Beom Park
Eun-Sil Kang
Sang-Min Lee
Hyun-Jin Kim
Matt Wasserman
Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South Korea
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
cost-effectiveness
pneumococcal disease
otitis media
pneumonia
vaccines
title Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South Korea
title_full Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South Korea
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South Korea
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South Korea
title_short Cost-effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in South Korea
title_sort cost effectiveness of a national immunization program with the 13 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine compared with the 10 valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in south korea
topic pneumococcal conjugate vaccine
cost-effectiveness
pneumococcal disease
otitis media
pneumonia
vaccines
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1796426
work_keys_str_mv AT hyeyoungkim costeffectivenessofanationalimmunizationprogramwiththe13valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccinecomparedwiththe10valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccineinsouthkorea
AT seongbeompark costeffectivenessofanationalimmunizationprogramwiththe13valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccinecomparedwiththe10valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccineinsouthkorea
AT eunsilkang costeffectivenessofanationalimmunizationprogramwiththe13valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccinecomparedwiththe10valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccineinsouthkorea
AT sangminlee costeffectivenessofanationalimmunizationprogramwiththe13valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccinecomparedwiththe10valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccineinsouthkorea
AT hyunjinkim costeffectivenessofanationalimmunizationprogramwiththe13valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccinecomparedwiththe10valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccineinsouthkorea
AT mattwasserman costeffectivenessofanationalimmunizationprogramwiththe13valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccinecomparedwiththe10valentpneumococcalconjugatevaccineinsouthkorea