Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife Habitat

Natural open spaces adjacent to developing cities are frequently affected by advancing urban sprawl. It requires a delicate balancing act to conserve habitats while developing new environments for city inhabitants. As landscape architects, planners, and managers of these areas, we continue to explor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Margaret Livingston, Josh Mehlem
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lincoln University 2004-06-01
Series:Landscape Review
Online Access:https://journals.lincoln.ac.nz/index.php/lr/article/view/180
_version_ 1797283601840078848
author Margaret Livingston
Josh Mehlem
author_facet Margaret Livingston
Josh Mehlem
author_sort Margaret Livingston
collection DOAJ
description Natural open spaces adjacent to developing cities are frequently affected by advancing urban sprawl. It requires a delicate balancing act to conserve habitats while developing new environments for city inhabitants. As landscape architects, planners, and managers of these areas, we continue to explore mitigation strategies for habitats affected by development. One strategy focuses on creating new spaces within development that can fulfil some of the functions previously provided by natural areas and serve as resource links among remaining peripheral natural areas (Forman and Godron, 1986). Previous research has shown that created open spaces, such as parks and golf courses may provide critical habitat functions associated with natural areas if planned appropriately (Mannan and Boal, 2000; Shaw et al, 1998). However, few studies have evaluated the specific characteristics associated with created open spaces for their wildlife habitat value. This research addresses the following question: What is the potential habitat value of current vegetation in urban parks in Tucson, Arizona? The goals of this study were to: 1) evaluate potential habitat value of urban parks using a wildlife habitat value index (Shaw et al, 1998), and 2) provide recommendations emphasising increased biodiversity through habitat development in these open spaces. Most vegetation in the surveyed parks was non-native and provided little escape cover for wildlife. Plant species richness and abundance were relatively low in most parks, but higher for sites where existing native vegetation was incorporated into the park. Recommendations emphasise: 1) appropriate arrangement and placement of species based on functions required by human and wildlife users; 2) increased horizontal and vertical vegetation layers; 3) design focus on regional plant communities; and 4) development of written specifications for parks that address design uses of native species and their maintenance.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T17:34:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d823fdb75a14c4d9b8be7bd474c49d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1173-3853
2253-1440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T17:34:08Z
publishDate 2004-06-01
publisher Lincoln University
record_format Article
series Landscape Review
spelling doaj.art-6d823fdb75a14c4d9b8be7bd474c49d92024-03-02T17:13:26ZengLincoln UniversityLandscape Review1173-38532253-14402004-06-0191162165174Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife HabitatMargaret LivingstonJosh MehlemNatural open spaces adjacent to developing cities are frequently affected by advancing urban sprawl. It requires a delicate balancing act to conserve habitats while developing new environments for city inhabitants. As landscape architects, planners, and managers of these areas, we continue to explore mitigation strategies for habitats affected by development. One strategy focuses on creating new spaces within development that can fulfil some of the functions previously provided by natural areas and serve as resource links among remaining peripheral natural areas (Forman and Godron, 1986). Previous research has shown that created open spaces, such as parks and golf courses may provide critical habitat functions associated with natural areas if planned appropriately (Mannan and Boal, 2000; Shaw et al, 1998). However, few studies have evaluated the specific characteristics associated with created open spaces for their wildlife habitat value. This research addresses the following question: What is the potential habitat value of current vegetation in urban parks in Tucson, Arizona? The goals of this study were to: 1) evaluate potential habitat value of urban parks using a wildlife habitat value index (Shaw et al, 1998), and 2) provide recommendations emphasising increased biodiversity through habitat development in these open spaces. Most vegetation in the surveyed parks was non-native and provided little escape cover for wildlife. Plant species richness and abundance were relatively low in most parks, but higher for sites where existing native vegetation was incorporated into the park. Recommendations emphasise: 1) appropriate arrangement and placement of species based on functions required by human and wildlife users; 2) increased horizontal and vertical vegetation layers; 3) design focus on regional plant communities; and 4) development of written specifications for parks that address design uses of native species and their maintenance.https://journals.lincoln.ac.nz/index.php/lr/article/view/180
spellingShingle Margaret Livingston
Josh Mehlem
Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife Habitat
Landscape Review
title Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife Habitat
title_full Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife Habitat
title_fullStr Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife Habitat
title_full_unstemmed Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife Habitat
title_short Planning open spaces for Biodiversity: Evaluating Urban Parks for Wildlife Habitat
title_sort planning open spaces for biodiversity evaluating urban parks for wildlife habitat
url https://journals.lincoln.ac.nz/index.php/lr/article/view/180
work_keys_str_mv AT margaretlivingston planningopenspacesforbiodiversityevaluatingurbanparksforwildlifehabitat
AT joshmehlem planningopenspacesforbiodiversityevaluatingurbanparksforwildlifehabitat