The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review
Peer review is an essential component of the academic publishing process, critical for the dissemination of new scientific information. Peer reviewers ensure that scientific assertions made in manuscripts are adequately supported by data in accordance with contemporary scientific standards. Despite...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Translational Medicine of Aging |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468501123000020 |
_version_ | 1827374936046436352 |
---|---|
author | Jonathan An Alex Mendenhall Matt Kaeberlein |
author_facet | Jonathan An Alex Mendenhall Matt Kaeberlein |
author_sort | Jonathan An |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Peer review is an essential component of the academic publishing process, critical for the dissemination of new scientific information. Peer reviewers ensure that scientific assertions made in manuscripts are adequately supported by data in accordance with contemporary scientific standards. Despite the critical nature of peer review, there is little or no formal training in peer review offered at most Universities. Here, we describe the design and implementation of formal peer review training incorporated into a graduate course on the pathology and biology of aging. We used the eLife peer review framework and primary research papers to train graduate students and postdocs how to perform peer review. More than half of the students were involved in subsequent, non-training peer reviews. Evaluation metrics suggests that students find value in the training process. We suggest formal training will improve the rigor and scientific consensus of the peer review process. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T11:42:28Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-6d93ff009f694f979fcc2f34e9fe540d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2468-5011 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T11:42:28Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. |
record_format | Article |
series | Translational Medicine of Aging |
spelling | doaj.art-6d93ff009f694f979fcc2f34e9fe540d2024-01-25T05:23:21ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Translational Medicine of Aging2468-50112023-01-017911The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer reviewJonathan An0Alex Mendenhall1Matt Kaeberlein2Corresponding author.; Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, United StatesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, United StatesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, United StatesPeer review is an essential component of the academic publishing process, critical for the dissemination of new scientific information. Peer reviewers ensure that scientific assertions made in manuscripts are adequately supported by data in accordance with contemporary scientific standards. Despite the critical nature of peer review, there is little or no formal training in peer review offered at most Universities. Here, we describe the design and implementation of formal peer review training incorporated into a graduate course on the pathology and biology of aging. We used the eLife peer review framework and primary research papers to train graduate students and postdocs how to perform peer review. More than half of the students were involved in subsequent, non-training peer reviews. Evaluation metrics suggests that students find value in the training process. We suggest formal training will improve the rigor and scientific consensus of the peer review process.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468501123000020Peer reviewGraduate schoolGeroscienceEthical behavior |
spellingShingle | Jonathan An Alex Mendenhall Matt Kaeberlein The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review Translational Medicine of Aging Peer review Graduate school Geroscience Ethical behavior |
title | The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review |
title_full | The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review |
title_fullStr | The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review |
title_full_unstemmed | The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review |
title_short | The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review |
title_sort | collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous ethical peer review |
topic | Peer review Graduate school Geroscience Ethical behavior |
url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468501123000020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonathanan thecollaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview AT alexmendenhall thecollaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview AT mattkaeberlein thecollaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview AT jonathanan collaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview AT alexmendenhall collaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview AT mattkaeberlein collaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview |