The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review

Peer review is an essential component of the academic publishing process, critical for the dissemination of new scientific information. Peer reviewers ensure that scientific assertions made in manuscripts are adequately supported by data in accordance with contemporary scientific standards. Despite...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan An, Alex Mendenhall, Matt Kaeberlein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. 2023-01-01
Series:Translational Medicine of Aging
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468501123000020
_version_ 1827374936046436352
author Jonathan An
Alex Mendenhall
Matt Kaeberlein
author_facet Jonathan An
Alex Mendenhall
Matt Kaeberlein
author_sort Jonathan An
collection DOAJ
description Peer review is an essential component of the academic publishing process, critical for the dissemination of new scientific information. Peer reviewers ensure that scientific assertions made in manuscripts are adequately supported by data in accordance with contemporary scientific standards. Despite the critical nature of peer review, there is little or no formal training in peer review offered at most Universities. Here, we describe the design and implementation of formal peer review training incorporated into a graduate course on the pathology and biology of aging. We used the eLife peer review framework and primary research papers to train graduate students and postdocs how to perform peer review. More than half of the students were involved in subsequent, non-training peer reviews. Evaluation metrics suggests that students find value in the training process. We suggest formal training will improve the rigor and scientific consensus of the peer review process.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:42:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d93ff009f694f979fcc2f34e9fe540d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2468-5011
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:42:28Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.
record_format Article
series Translational Medicine of Aging
spelling doaj.art-6d93ff009f694f979fcc2f34e9fe540d2024-01-25T05:23:21ZengKeAi Communications Co., Ltd.Translational Medicine of Aging2468-50112023-01-017911The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer reviewJonathan An0Alex Mendenhall1Matt Kaeberlein2Corresponding author.; Department of Oral Health Sciences, University of Washington, United StatesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, United StatesDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, United StatesPeer review is an essential component of the academic publishing process, critical for the dissemination of new scientific information. Peer reviewers ensure that scientific assertions made in manuscripts are adequately supported by data in accordance with contemporary scientific standards. Despite the critical nature of peer review, there is little or no formal training in peer review offered at most Universities. Here, we describe the design and implementation of formal peer review training incorporated into a graduate course on the pathology and biology of aging. We used the eLife peer review framework and primary research papers to train graduate students and postdocs how to perform peer review. More than half of the students were involved in subsequent, non-training peer reviews. Evaluation metrics suggests that students find value in the training process. We suggest formal training will improve the rigor and scientific consensus of the peer review process.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468501123000020Peer reviewGraduate schoolGeroscienceEthical behavior
spellingShingle Jonathan An
Alex Mendenhall
Matt Kaeberlein
The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review
Translational Medicine of Aging
Peer review
Graduate school
Geroscience
Ethical behavior
title The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review
title_full The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review
title_fullStr The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review
title_full_unstemmed The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review
title_short The collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous, ethical peer review
title_sort collaborative peer review framework as a model for training biomedical graduate students to perform rigorous ethical peer review
topic Peer review
Graduate school
Geroscience
Ethical behavior
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468501123000020
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanan thecollaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview
AT alexmendenhall thecollaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview
AT mattkaeberlein thecollaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview
AT jonathanan collaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview
AT alexmendenhall collaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview
AT mattkaeberlein collaborativepeerreviewframeworkasamodelfortrainingbiomedicalgraduatestudentstoperformrigorousethicalpeerreview