Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Background and purposeTo validate the feasibility and efficiency of a fully automatic knowledge-based planning (KBP) method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases, with special attention to the possible way that the success rate of auto-planning can be improved.Methods and materialsA knowledge-bas...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiang Hu, Boji Liu, Weihao Xie, Jinhan Zhu, Xiaoli Yu, Huikuan Gu, Mingli Wang, Yixuan Wang, ZhenYu Qi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.551763/full
_version_ 1818427524104847360
author Jiang Hu
Boji Liu
Weihao Xie
Jinhan Zhu
Xiaoli Yu
Huikuan Gu
Mingli Wang
Yixuan Wang
ZhenYu Qi
author_facet Jiang Hu
Boji Liu
Weihao Xie
Jinhan Zhu
Xiaoli Yu
Huikuan Gu
Mingli Wang
Yixuan Wang
ZhenYu Qi
author_sort Jiang Hu
collection DOAJ
description Background and purposeTo validate the feasibility and efficiency of a fully automatic knowledge-based planning (KBP) method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases, with special attention to the possible way that the success rate of auto-planning can be improved.Methods and materialsA knowledge-based dose volume histogram (DVH) prediction model was developed based on 99 formerly treated NPC patients, by means of which the optimization objectives and the corresponding priorities for intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) planning were automatically generated for each head and neck organ at risk (OAR). The automatic KBP method was thus evaluated in 17 new NPC cases with comparison to manual plans (MP) and expert plans (EXP) in terms of target dose coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and normal tissue protection. To quantify the plan quality, a metric was applied for plan evaluation. The variation in the plan quality and time consumption among planners was also investigated.ResultsWith comparable target dose distributions, the KBP method achieved a significant dose reduction in critical organs such as the optic chiasm (p<0.001), optic nerve (p=0.021), and temporal lobe (p<0.001), but failed to spare the spinal cord (p<0.001) compared with MPs and EXPs. The overall plan quality evaluation gave mean scores of 144.59±11.48, 142.71±15.18, and 144.82±15.17, respectively, for KBPs, MPs, and EXPs (p=0.259). A total of 15 out of 17 KBPs (i.e., 88.24%) were approved by our physician as clinically acceptable.ConclusionThe automatic KBP method using the DVH prediction model provided a possible way to generate clinically acceptable plans in a short time for NPC patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T14:47:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6d984f649fb14812aea7f31ff9b85786
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-943X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T14:47:05Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Oncology
spelling doaj.art-6d984f649fb14812aea7f31ff9b857862022-12-21T22:57:15ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-01-011010.3389/fonc.2020.551763551763Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaJiang Hu0Boji Liu1Weihao Xie2Jinhan Zhu3Xiaoli Yu4Huikuan Gu5Mingli Wang6Yixuan Wang7ZhenYu Qi8Department of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaSun Yat-sen Memory Hospital, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangzhou, ChinaBackground and purposeTo validate the feasibility and efficiency of a fully automatic knowledge-based planning (KBP) method for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cases, with special attention to the possible way that the success rate of auto-planning can be improved.Methods and materialsA knowledge-based dose volume histogram (DVH) prediction model was developed based on 99 formerly treated NPC patients, by means of which the optimization objectives and the corresponding priorities for intensity modulation radiation therapy (IMRT) planning were automatically generated for each head and neck organ at risk (OAR). The automatic KBP method was thus evaluated in 17 new NPC cases with comparison to manual plans (MP) and expert plans (EXP) in terms of target dose coverage, conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), and normal tissue protection. To quantify the plan quality, a metric was applied for plan evaluation. The variation in the plan quality and time consumption among planners was also investigated.ResultsWith comparable target dose distributions, the KBP method achieved a significant dose reduction in critical organs such as the optic chiasm (p<0.001), optic nerve (p=0.021), and temporal lobe (p<0.001), but failed to spare the spinal cord (p<0.001) compared with MPs and EXPs. The overall plan quality evaluation gave mean scores of 144.59±11.48, 142.71±15.18, and 144.82±15.17, respectively, for KBPs, MPs, and EXPs (p=0.259). A total of 15 out of 17 KBPs (i.e., 88.24%) were approved by our physician as clinically acceptable.ConclusionThe automatic KBP method using the DVH prediction model provided a possible way to generate clinically acceptable plans in a short time for NPC patients.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.551763/fullknowledge-based planningintensity modulated radiation therapynasopharyngeal carcinomaplan qualitydose volume histogram prediction model
spellingShingle Jiang Hu
Boji Liu
Weihao Xie
Jinhan Zhu
Xiaoli Yu
Huikuan Gu
Mingli Wang
Yixuan Wang
ZhenYu Qi
Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Frontiers in Oncology
knowledge-based planning
intensity modulated radiation therapy
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
plan quality
dose volume histogram prediction model
title Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_full Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_fullStr Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_short Quantitative Comparison of Knowledge-Based and Manual Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Planning for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
title_sort quantitative comparison of knowledge based and manual intensity modulated radiation therapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma
topic knowledge-based planning
intensity modulated radiation therapy
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
plan quality
dose volume histogram prediction model
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.551763/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jianghu quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT bojiliu quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT weihaoxie quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT jinhanzhu quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT xiaoliyu quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT huikuangu quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT mingliwang quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT yixuanwang quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma
AT zhenyuqi quantitativecomparisonofknowledgebasedandmanualintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyplanningfornasopharyngealcarcinoma