Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization

Background: Prostheses for the reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors are prone to instigate stress shielding. The purpose of this study is to design 3D-printed prostheses with topology optimization (TO) for the reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors and to add porous structures to reduc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jiazhuang Zhu, Jianping Hu, Kunpeng Zhu, Xiaolong Ma, Yongjie Wang, Enjie Xu, Zhen Huang, Yurun Zhu, Chunlin Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1289363/full
_version_ 1797404578298200064
author Jiazhuang Zhu
Jianping Hu
Kunpeng Zhu
Xiaolong Ma
Yongjie Wang
Enjie Xu
Zhen Huang
Yurun Zhu
Chunlin Zhang
author_facet Jiazhuang Zhu
Jianping Hu
Kunpeng Zhu
Xiaolong Ma
Yongjie Wang
Enjie Xu
Zhen Huang
Yurun Zhu
Chunlin Zhang
author_sort Jiazhuang Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Background: Prostheses for the reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors are prone to instigate stress shielding. The purpose of this study is to design 3D-printed prostheses with topology optimization (TO) for the reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors and to add porous structures to reduce stress shielding and facilitate integration between prostheses and host bone.Methods: Utilizing patient CT data, we constructed a finite element analysis (FEA) model. Subsequent phases encompassed carrying out TO on the designated area, utilizing the solid isotropic material penalization model (SIMP), and this optimized removal area was replaced with a porous structure. Further analyses included preoperative FEA simulations to comparatively evaluate parameters, including maximum stress, stress distribution, strain energy density (SED), and the relative micromotion of prostheses before and after TO. Furthermore, FEA based on patients’ postoperative CT data was conducted again to assess the potential risk of stress shielding subsequent to implantation. Ultimately, preliminary follow-up findings from two patients were documented.Results: In both prostheses, the SED before and after TO increased by 143.61% (from 0.10322 to 0.25145 mJ/mm3) and 35.050% (from 0.30964 to 0.41817 mJ/mm3) respectively, showing significant differences (p < 0.001). The peak stress in the Type II prosthesis decreased by 10.494% (from 77.227 to 69.123 MPa), while there was no significant change in peak stress for the Type I prosthesis. There were no significant changes in stress distribution or the proportion of regions with micromotion less than 28 μm before and after TO for either prosthesis. Postoperative FEA verified results showed that the stress in the pelvis and prostheses remained at relatively low levels. The results of follow-up showed that the patients had successful osseointegration and their MSTS scores at the 12th month after surgery were both 100%.Conclusion: These two types of 3D-printed porous prostheses using TO for periacetabular bone tumor reconstruction offer advantages over traditional prostheses by reducing stress shielding and promoting osseointegration, while maintaining the original stiffness of the prosthesis. Furthermore, in vivo experiments show that these prostheses meet the requirements for daily activities of patients. This study provides a valuable reference for the design of future periacetabular bone tumor reconstruction prostheses.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T02:57:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6da28483b20147309fa1f30adf7c0966
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-4185
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T02:57:02Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
spelling doaj.art-6da28483b20147309fa1f30adf7c09662023-12-05T04:14:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology2296-41852023-12-011110.3389/fbioe.2023.12893631289363Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimizationJiazhuang ZhuJianping HuKunpeng ZhuXiaolong MaYongjie WangEnjie XuZhen HuangYurun ZhuChunlin ZhangBackground: Prostheses for the reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors are prone to instigate stress shielding. The purpose of this study is to design 3D-printed prostheses with topology optimization (TO) for the reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors and to add porous structures to reduce stress shielding and facilitate integration between prostheses and host bone.Methods: Utilizing patient CT data, we constructed a finite element analysis (FEA) model. Subsequent phases encompassed carrying out TO on the designated area, utilizing the solid isotropic material penalization model (SIMP), and this optimized removal area was replaced with a porous structure. Further analyses included preoperative FEA simulations to comparatively evaluate parameters, including maximum stress, stress distribution, strain energy density (SED), and the relative micromotion of prostheses before and after TO. Furthermore, FEA based on patients’ postoperative CT data was conducted again to assess the potential risk of stress shielding subsequent to implantation. Ultimately, preliminary follow-up findings from two patients were documented.Results: In both prostheses, the SED before and after TO increased by 143.61% (from 0.10322 to 0.25145 mJ/mm3) and 35.050% (from 0.30964 to 0.41817 mJ/mm3) respectively, showing significant differences (p < 0.001). The peak stress in the Type II prosthesis decreased by 10.494% (from 77.227 to 69.123 MPa), while there was no significant change in peak stress for the Type I prosthesis. There were no significant changes in stress distribution or the proportion of regions with micromotion less than 28 μm before and after TO for either prosthesis. Postoperative FEA verified results showed that the stress in the pelvis and prostheses remained at relatively low levels. The results of follow-up showed that the patients had successful osseointegration and their MSTS scores at the 12th month after surgery were both 100%.Conclusion: These two types of 3D-printed porous prostheses using TO for periacetabular bone tumor reconstruction offer advantages over traditional prostheses by reducing stress shielding and promoting osseointegration, while maintaining the original stiffness of the prosthesis. Furthermore, in vivo experiments show that these prostheses meet the requirements for daily activities of patients. This study provides a valuable reference for the design of future periacetabular bone tumor reconstruction prostheses.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1289363/full3D-printed prosthesesperiacetabular bone tumorstopology optimizationfinite element analysisporous structureclinical outcomes
spellingShingle Jiazhuang Zhu
Jianping Hu
Kunpeng Zhu
Xiaolong Ma
Yongjie Wang
Enjie Xu
Zhen Huang
Yurun Zhu
Chunlin Zhang
Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
3D-printed prostheses
periacetabular bone tumors
topology optimization
finite element analysis
porous structure
clinical outcomes
title Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization
title_full Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization
title_fullStr Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization
title_full_unstemmed Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization
title_short Design of 3D-printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization
title_sort design of 3d printed prostheses for reconstruction of periacetabular bone tumors using topology optimization
topic 3D-printed prostheses
periacetabular bone tumors
topology optimization
finite element analysis
porous structure
clinical outcomes
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1289363/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jiazhuangzhu designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT jianpinghu designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT kunpengzhu designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT xiaolongma designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT yongjiewang designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT enjiexu designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT zhenhuang designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT yurunzhu designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization
AT chunlinzhang designof3dprintedprosthesesforreconstructionofperiacetabularbonetumorsusingtopologyoptimization