Chlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)

Abstract Background Hemodialysis-associated anaphylactic reactions are rare and frequently complex in nature due to the sheer number of possible culprit agents. Unfortunately, dialysis is often unavoidable or strictly essential for life-saving solute clearance or fluid removal in patients with end s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jia Neng TAN, Yi, Sabrina HAROON, Titus LAU
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-01-01
Series:BMC Nephrology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02646-x
_version_ 1798034519199055872
author Jia Neng TAN
Yi
Sabrina HAROON
Titus LAU
author_facet Jia Neng TAN
Yi
Sabrina HAROON
Titus LAU
author_sort Jia Neng TAN
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Hemodialysis-associated anaphylactic reactions are rare and frequently complex in nature due to the sheer number of possible culprit agents. Unfortunately, dialysis is often unavoidable or strictly essential for life-saving solute clearance or fluid removal in patients with end stage kidney failure and those with severe acute kidney injury. It is of utmost importance that the culprit agent is identified and avoided to allow continuation of dialysis treatment as needed. Case presentation We present 2 cases of hemodialysis-associated anaphylactic reactions. These patients developed anaphylactic reactions peri-dialysis and were initially suspected to have dialyser reactions. They were investigated in a controlled healthcare setting and possible culprit agents were systemically identified and eliminated. They both underwent allergy testing and were diagnosed with chlorhexidine allergy. Of note, Case 1 was an incident dialysis patient at the time of presentation and Case 2 was a prevalent dialysis patient. This suggests that the time from initial sensitization to reaction may not always be helpful in determining if a particular agent is the culprit of an anaphylactic reaction. In both cases, the patients were dialysed through a tunnelled dialysis catheter. We postulate that the presence of an exit site, which represents a compromise to the integrity of the skin’s epidermal barrier, may have a significant role in the development of these reactions. As chlorhexidine is a widely used disinfectant in hemodialysis, it is imperative that we consider it as a possible culprit agent when these reactions arise. To our knowledge, there are no other reported cases of anaphylaxis secondary to chlorhexidine use in dialysis patients other than a previous report in 2017. Our report also highlights the possibility of these reactions occurring more frequently in patients with damaged epidermal barriers and in patients exposed to higher environmental concentrations of chlorhexidine. These are novel concepts that can be explored with further research. Conclusion Chlorhexidine associated anaphylactic reactions can occur in the peri-dialysis setting and a high index of suspicion is paramount to diagnosis.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:45:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6da581d7af2c4e0ba8fbea5513fe08fc
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2369
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:45:17Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Nephrology
spelling doaj.art-6da581d7af2c4e0ba8fbea5513fe08fc2022-12-22T04:04:04ZengBMCBMC Nephrology1471-23692022-01-012311710.1186/s12882-021-02646-xChlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)Jia Neng TAN0Yi1Sabrina HAROON2Titus LAU3Division of Nephrology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System Republic of SingaporeDivision of Nephrology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System Republic of SingaporeDivision of Nephrology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System Republic of SingaporeDivision of Nephrology, University Medicine Cluster, National University Health System Republic of SingaporeAbstract Background Hemodialysis-associated anaphylactic reactions are rare and frequently complex in nature due to the sheer number of possible culprit agents. Unfortunately, dialysis is often unavoidable or strictly essential for life-saving solute clearance or fluid removal in patients with end stage kidney failure and those with severe acute kidney injury. It is of utmost importance that the culprit agent is identified and avoided to allow continuation of dialysis treatment as needed. Case presentation We present 2 cases of hemodialysis-associated anaphylactic reactions. These patients developed anaphylactic reactions peri-dialysis and were initially suspected to have dialyser reactions. They were investigated in a controlled healthcare setting and possible culprit agents were systemically identified and eliminated. They both underwent allergy testing and were diagnosed with chlorhexidine allergy. Of note, Case 1 was an incident dialysis patient at the time of presentation and Case 2 was a prevalent dialysis patient. This suggests that the time from initial sensitization to reaction may not always be helpful in determining if a particular agent is the culprit of an anaphylactic reaction. In both cases, the patients were dialysed through a tunnelled dialysis catheter. We postulate that the presence of an exit site, which represents a compromise to the integrity of the skin’s epidermal barrier, may have a significant role in the development of these reactions. As chlorhexidine is a widely used disinfectant in hemodialysis, it is imperative that we consider it as a possible culprit agent when these reactions arise. To our knowledge, there are no other reported cases of anaphylaxis secondary to chlorhexidine use in dialysis patients other than a previous report in 2017. Our report also highlights the possibility of these reactions occurring more frequently in patients with damaged epidermal barriers and in patients exposed to higher environmental concentrations of chlorhexidine. These are novel concepts that can be explored with further research. Conclusion Chlorhexidine associated anaphylactic reactions can occur in the peri-dialysis setting and a high index of suspicion is paramount to diagnosis.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02646-xChlorhexidine allergyDialysisDialyser reactionscase report
spellingShingle Jia Neng TAN
Yi
Sabrina HAROON
Titus LAU
Chlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)
BMC Nephrology
Chlorhexidine allergy
Dialysis
Dialyser reactions
case report
title Chlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)
title_full Chlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)
title_fullStr Chlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)
title_full_unstemmed Chlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)
title_short Chlorhexidine – a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions (case report)
title_sort chlorhexidine a commonly used but often neglected culprit of dialysis associated anaphylactic reactions case report
topic Chlorhexidine allergy
Dialysis
Dialyser reactions
case report
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02646-x
work_keys_str_mv AT jianengtan chlorhexidineacommonlyusedbutoftenneglectedculpritofdialysisassociatedanaphylacticreactionscasereport
AT yi chlorhexidineacommonlyusedbutoftenneglectedculpritofdialysisassociatedanaphylacticreactionscasereport
AT sabrinaharoon chlorhexidineacommonlyusedbutoftenneglectedculpritofdialysisassociatedanaphylacticreactionscasereport
AT tituslau chlorhexidineacommonlyusedbutoftenneglectedculpritofdialysisassociatedanaphylacticreactionscasereport