Blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway as a Rescue Device in Paediatric Patient with Retrognathia Posted for Microtia Reconstruction Surgery: A Case Report

The first and second branchial arches, along with the first branchial cleft, contribute to the development of ear and mandible. Children with microtia can have retrognathia or micrognathia and have challenging airway management. Managing the airway in these patients presents a significant challenge...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Madhu, Monika, Roopa, Himadri Chanda, Nitu Yadav
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2024-04-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jcdr.net/articles/PDF/19235/69751_CE[Ra1]_F(IS)_QC_REF_PAT(SD_IS)_PF1(AG_DK)_PFA(AG_KM)_PN(KM).pdf
Description
Summary:The first and second branchial arches, along with the first branchial cleft, contribute to the development of ear and mandible. Children with microtia can have retrognathia or micrognathia and have challenging airway management. Managing the airway in these patients presents a significant challenge for anaesthesiologists as they have the potential for upper airway obstruction and challenging tracheal intubation because of facial deformities. Although awake fiberoptic intubation is a well-accepted method for handling difficult intubations, it can be uncomfortable and stressful for paediatric patients. Moreover, it demands expertise and is unsuitable for patients unwilling to undergo awake intubation. This case report highlights the use of the blockbuster Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) in an 11-year-old retrognathic child with microtia with anterior larynx scheduled for auricular reconstruction surgery. There was a failure to secure the airway with multiple attempts at traditional intubation and the supraglottic airway device i-gel, as the child had an anterior larynx and Cormack Lehane (CL) grading of 4 on direct laryngoscopy. The blockbuster LMA, distinguished by its innovative design facilitating both ventilation and intubation through an integrated channel, emerged as a pivotal alternative. The supraglottic device is not the technique of choice, but it can definitely be an alternative and could be life-saving in situations where fiberoptic bronchoscopy and tracheostomy are not available.
ISSN:2249-782X
0973-709X