3224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study aims to examine the relative impact of aortic arch and carotid artery anatomy on the procedural times and clinical outcomes in patients who have suffered acute ischemic strokes (AIS). Mechanical thrombectomy remains the gold-standard of care for large vessel isch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph A Knox, Judy Ch’ang, Daniel Murph, David Mccoy, Daniel Cooke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2019-03-01
Series:Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Online Access:https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866119003339/type/journal_article
_version_ 1811156642248523776
author Joseph A Knox
Judy Ch’ang
Daniel Murph
David Mccoy
Daniel Cooke
author_facet Joseph A Knox
Judy Ch’ang
Daniel Murph
David Mccoy
Daniel Cooke
author_sort Joseph A Knox
collection DOAJ
description OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study aims to examine the relative impact of aortic arch and carotid artery anatomy on the procedural times and clinical outcomes in patients who have suffered acute ischemic strokes (AIS). Mechanical thrombectomy remains the gold-standard of care for large vessel ischemic stroke. Given that short procedural times are necessary for good clinical outcomes, arterial access is an important technical consideration. It has been recently demonstrated that abnormal carotid artery anatomy can increase endovascular procedure times in this patient population. However, there are no studies examining the impact of aortic arch anatomy on operative times. Additionally, no studies have looked at the impact of aortic arch and carotid artery tortuosity on clinical outcomes in AIS. Thus, we sought to exam the influence of various aortic arch and carotid artery anatomic variables on interventional procedure times and clinical outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We included 56 patients who underwent embolectomy with successful revascularization for acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation from a period of 01/2016-05/2018. The average age was 71 (+/− 17 years) with 39% being male. We calculated anatomic variables on the affected side from CT angiograms immediately prior to embolectomy including the medial-to-lateral span, as well as the anterior-to-posterior span, of both the aortic arch and carotid arteries. In addition, the take-off angle of the respective vessel (left common carotid or right brachiocephalic) was calculated. Charts were reviewed for procedural times and epidemiologic information (HTN, HLD, DM, CAD and Afib). Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was calculated from PT/OT and outpatient neurology notes. Partial correlation coefficients were performed between anatomic variables, temporal variables and outcome variables after adjustment for age, gender and epidemiologic information. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There was a significant positive correlation between procedure time (time at groin puncture to time at reperfusion) and take-off angle. There were no other significant correlations between anatomic measures and procedure time. In addition, there was as a significant positive correlation between both procedure time and time from last seen normal to reperfusion and delta mRS (the difference between pre-stroke and post-stroke mRS). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results suggest that patients with larger take-off angles have an association with longer procedural times and worse outcomes. If these patients can be effectively identified prior to the procedure, operators could feasibly use a non-femoral access method initially to reduce procedure time.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-6db53b0c9d784a4aaabdfef2c7a253d9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2059-8661
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T04:53:43Z
publishDate 2019-03-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
spelling doaj.art-6db53b0c9d784a4aaabdfef2c7a253d92023-03-09T12:30:30ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612019-03-01314614710.1017/cts.2019.3333224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patientsJoseph A Knox0Judy Ch’ang1Daniel Murph2David Mccoy3Daniel Cooke4University Of California, San FranciscoUniversity Of California, San FranciscoUniversity Of California, San FranciscoUniversity Of California, San FranciscoUniversity Of California, San FranciscoOBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: This study aims to examine the relative impact of aortic arch and carotid artery anatomy on the procedural times and clinical outcomes in patients who have suffered acute ischemic strokes (AIS). Mechanical thrombectomy remains the gold-standard of care for large vessel ischemic stroke. Given that short procedural times are necessary for good clinical outcomes, arterial access is an important technical consideration. It has been recently demonstrated that abnormal carotid artery anatomy can increase endovascular procedure times in this patient population. However, there are no studies examining the impact of aortic arch anatomy on operative times. Additionally, no studies have looked at the impact of aortic arch and carotid artery tortuosity on clinical outcomes in AIS. Thus, we sought to exam the influence of various aortic arch and carotid artery anatomic variables on interventional procedure times and clinical outcomes. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We included 56 patients who underwent embolectomy with successful revascularization for acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation from a period of 01/2016-05/2018. The average age was 71 (+/− 17 years) with 39% being male. We calculated anatomic variables on the affected side from CT angiograms immediately prior to embolectomy including the medial-to-lateral span, as well as the anterior-to-posterior span, of both the aortic arch and carotid arteries. In addition, the take-off angle of the respective vessel (left common carotid or right brachiocephalic) was calculated. Charts were reviewed for procedural times and epidemiologic information (HTN, HLD, DM, CAD and Afib). Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was calculated from PT/OT and outpatient neurology notes. Partial correlation coefficients were performed between anatomic variables, temporal variables and outcome variables after adjustment for age, gender and epidemiologic information. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: There was a significant positive correlation between procedure time (time at groin puncture to time at reperfusion) and take-off angle. There were no other significant correlations between anatomic measures and procedure time. In addition, there was as a significant positive correlation between both procedure time and time from last seen normal to reperfusion and delta mRS (the difference between pre-stroke and post-stroke mRS). DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: These results suggest that patients with larger take-off angles have an association with longer procedural times and worse outcomes. If these patients can be effectively identified prior to the procedure, operators could feasibly use a non-femoral access method initially to reduce procedure time.https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866119003339/type/journal_article
spellingShingle Joseph A Knox
Judy Ch’ang
Daniel Murph
David Mccoy
Daniel Cooke
3224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
title 3224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_full 3224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_fullStr 3224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_full_unstemmed 3224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_short 3224 Impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients
title_sort 3224 impact of aortic arch anatomy on technical performance and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients
url https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866119003339/type/journal_article
work_keys_str_mv AT josephaknox 3224impactofaorticarchanatomyontechnicalperformanceandclinicaloutcomesinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT judychang 3224impactofaorticarchanatomyontechnicalperformanceandclinicaloutcomesinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT danielmurph 3224impactofaorticarchanatomyontechnicalperformanceandclinicaloutcomesinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT davidmccoy 3224impactofaorticarchanatomyontechnicalperformanceandclinicaloutcomesinacuteischemicstrokepatients
AT danielcooke 3224impactofaorticarchanatomyontechnicalperformanceandclinicaloutcomesinacuteischemicstrokepatients